ET vs WMB: How Energy Transfer and Williams Companies Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: ET is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ET and WMB share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ET and WMB exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Energy Transfer owns and operates one of the largest and most diversified energy-infrastructure portfolios in the United States, spanning roughly 140,000 miles of pipeline across 44 states with assets in all major production basins. Its segments include natural gas gathering, processing, and intrastate and interstate transportation and storage; crude oil transportation and terminalling; NGL transportation, fractionation, and export; and refined products. The business is largely fee-based: it earns money by moving and storing volumes for producers, refiners, utilities, and exporters under long-term contracts, which makes cash flow less directly tied to commodity prices than an exploration company, though volumes and spreads still matter. Recent growth is concentrated in the Permian Basin, NGL exports (which set company records in Q1 2026), and a wave of natural-gas supply agreements tied to data centers and power generation, including deals to deliver gas to Oracle data centers.

Full ET guide

The Williams Companies, Inc. (NYSE: WMB) is a Tulsa-based energy infrastructure company focused almost entirely on natural gas. Its crown jewel is Transco, an interstate pipeline running more than 10,000 miles from south Texas and the Gulf Coast up the Atlantic Seaboard to the New York City area, complemented by the Northwest Pipeline in the Pacific Northwest and an extensive footprint of gathering, processing, and storage assets in basins such as the Marcellus and Haynesville. Williams makes most of its money through long-term, fee-based and capacity-reservation contracts under which customers pay to reserve and use pipeline space largely regardless of how much gas actually flows, which gives its cash flows a utility-like stability. Across its systems, Williams handles roughly a third of the natural gas used in the United States.

Full WMB guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• ET drivers: Fee-based midstream cash flows; High distribution and stated growth target.
• WMB drivers: Fee-based gas transport core; LNG export and Transco expansion growth.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Energy Transfer's volumes and some spreads remain exposed to commodity cycles, drilling activity, and energy demand, so a downturn in production or prices can pressure cash flow. For WMB, williams carries meaningful leverage, with net debt of roughly $29.5 billion, so a period of higher-for-longer interest rates would raise refinancing costs and could compress free cash flow.

Pick ET if you believe its drivers more; WMB if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ET and WMB guides.

ET. Energy Transfer is most often evaluated on cash-flow and yield metrics rather than traditional earnings multiples, because as a midstream MLP its appeal is income from distributions backed by distributable cash flow. As of June 2026 the units yielded roughly 7%, supported by record NGL and Permian volumes and a stated 3% to 5% distribution-growth target. These are descriptive figures tied to the asOf date, not projections, and yields move with the unit price.

WMB. Reading a midstream C-corp like Williams is less about GAAP net income and more about contracted cash flow. Investors typically focus on adjusted EBITDA, available funds from operations (AFFO) or distributable cash flow, dividend coverage (AFFO comfortably exceeded the dividend in FY2025), and leverage measured as net debt to EBITDA. Because most EBITDA is fee-based, results are steadier than a producer's, and the headline EV/EBITDA multiple captures the market's view of that durability plus growth from expansions and power projects. As a C-corporation, Williams reports its payout on a 1099 dividend form rather than the K-1 that MLP-structured peers issue, which simplifies tax filing.

Headline figures (approximate, 2026-06): ET shows revenue (ttm) ~$89 billion, distributable cash flow (q1 2026, attributable to partners) ~$2.7 billion, distribution yield ~7% (quarterly distribution ~$0.338/unit), 2026 adjusted ebitda guidance ~$18.2-$18.6 billion; WMB shows adjusted ebitda (fy2025) ~$7.75 billion, up ~9% YoY, adjusted eps (fy2025) ~$2.10 per diluted share, available funds from operations (fy2025) ~$5.86 billion, 2026 adjusted ebitda guidance (midpoint) ~$8.2 billion.

ET and WMB are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ET and WMB exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.