FN vs SANM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
FN is the larger of the two ($20.15B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (32.47x forward earnings, beta 1.22). SANM is the smaller challenger ($9.95B), cheaper on forward earnings (13.33x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
FN vs SANM: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | FN | SANM | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $20.15B | $9.95B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 32.47 | 13.33 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 48.31 | 33.19 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.22 | 1.56 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 61% of range | 43% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 8.74 | 4.11 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: SANM is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how FN and SANM affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. FN and SANM share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined FN and SANM exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Fabrinet (FN) do?
Fabrinet is an outsourced manufacturing partner for companies that design complex optical and electro-mechanical products but do not want to build them. Its plants, concentrated in Thailand with additional sites in the United States, Israel, China and the United Kingdom, handle optical packaging, precision assembly and test for transceivers, lasers, sensors and interconnect modules. Customers are the optical component and networking vendors themselves, so Fabrinet's revenue tracks the aggregate volume shipped across the industry rather than the market share of any one designer. Recent annual filings have named Nvidia and Cisco among the customers exceeding 10% of revenue, and roughly 16,500 employees support the operation. The company is incorporated in the Cayman Islands, files with the SEC as a domestic filer and has traded on the NYSE since its 2010 IPO.
What does Sanmina Corporation (SANM) do?
Sanmina Corporation, founded in Silicon Valley in 1980 and headquartered in San Jose, California, is a Fortune 500 global provider of integrated manufacturing solutions, components, and repair, logistics and after-market services. It serves original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) across industrial and energy, medical, defense and aerospace, automotive, communications networks, and cloud and AI infrastructure, running two businesses: Integrated Manufacturing Solutions and Components, Products and Services. It employs roughly 35,000 people and serves customers from around 20 countries.
FN vs SANM: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- FN drivers: Data center interconnect and telecom acceleration; Capacity is the constraint being removed.
- SANM drivers: AI and cloud infrastructure ramp; AMD partnership and preferred-manufacturer status.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Customer concentration is the structural weak point: a small set of customers each exceed 10% of revenue, and an insourcing decision or a design loss at one of them removes volume Fabrinet cannot easily replace. For SANM, sanmina operates on thin EMS margins (non-GAAP operating margin around 6%), so small execution errors or pricing pressure can meaningfully affect profits.
FN or SANM: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick FN if you believe its drivers more; SANM if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the FN and SANM guides.
FN vs SANM: the full fundamentals
FN. Fabrinet trades at a software-adjacent multiple on hardware-assembly economics, which only reconciles if volume keeps compounding at the current rate. Fiscal Q4 guidance of roughly $1.25 billion to $1.29 billion implies about 40% year-over-year growth at the midpoint, and results are due around August 17, 2026. The forward multiple near 34 times already prices a good deal of that in.
SANM. Revenue and earnings stepped up sharply after the ZT Systems acquisition closed in late 2025, roughly doubling quarterly sales. The stock trades at a large premium to its roughly 15x ten-year average P/E, reflecting AI-driven enthusiasm, so much of the future growth appears to be priced in.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): FN shows revenue (ttm) ~$4.24 billion (up ~30% YoY), fiscal q3 2026 revenue ~$1.214 billion (up ~39% YoY, a record), net income (ttm) ~$421 million, EPS ~$11.64, market cap / p/e ~$20.2 billion, ~48x trailing and ~34x forward; SANM shows revenue (fy2026 guidance) ~$13.7B to $14.3B, q2 fy2026 revenue ~$4.0B (up ~102% YoY), fy2025 revenue ~$8.1B, non-gaap eps (fy2026 guidance) ~$10.75 to $11.35.
The bottom line: FN vs SANM
FN and SANM are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined FN and SANM exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how FN or SANM fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Fabrinet with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how FN fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between FN and SANM?
+
Fabrinet is an outsourced manufacturing partner for companies that design complex optical and electro-mechanical products but do not want to build them. Sanmina Corporation, founded in Silicon Valley in 1980 and headquartered in San Jose, California, is a Fortune 500 global provider of integrated manufacturing solutions, components, and repair, logistics and after-market services. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is FN or SANM the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. FN is the larger incumbent; SANM is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, FN or SANM?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), FN trades at 32.47x and SANM at 13.33x, so SANM is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both FN and SANM?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of FN vs SANM?
+
FN: Customer concentration is the structural weak point: a small set of customers each exceed 10% of revenue, and an insourcing decision or a design loss at one of them removes volume Fabrinet cannot easily replace. Gross margin near 12% leaves little cushion, so foreign exchange moves in the Thai baht and inefficiencies on new program ramps both showed up directly in the fiscal Q3 result, which slipped 30 basis points sequentially. Datacom revenue grew only about 4% year over year because component shortages in lasers, memory and ASICs held shipments below actual demand, a reminder that Fabrinet's output depends on parts it does not control. Manufacturing is heavily concentrated in Thailand, which concentrates tariff, trade-policy and single-country operating risk. At roughly 48 times trailing earnings and about 40 times EV/EBITDA for a business earning contract-manufacturing margins, the valuation assumes the AI optics cycle keeps running, and the 52-week range of roughly $272 to $749 shows how fast that assumption gets repriced. SANM: Sanmina operates on thin EMS margins (non-GAAP operating margin around 6%), so small execution errors or pricing pressure can meaningfully affect profits. The ZT Systems business creates heavy revenue concentration tied to AI and data-center capital spending, which is cyclical and could slow if hyperscaler or AMD-related demand cools. Integration of a multi-billion-dollar acquisition carries operational and financial risk, and the AMD relationship makes results partly dependent on one large partner. The stock now trades at a large premium to its long-run average valuation, so disappointment relative to lofty AI expectations could pressure the shares. Broader risks include supply-chain disruption, customer concentration, and macro cyclicality across its industrial and communications markets.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell FN or SANM; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.