GNRC vs JBTM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
GNRC is the larger of the two ($10.70B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (15.35x forward earnings, beta 1.92). JBTM is the smaller challenger ($6.04B), cheaper on forward earnings (12.56x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
GNRC vs JBTM: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | GNRC | JBTM | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $10.70B | $6.04B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 15.35 | 12.56 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 41.61 | 31.37 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.92 | 0.94 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 29% of range | 6% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 3.72 | 1.35 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: JBTM is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how GNRC and JBTM affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. GNRC and JBTM share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined GNRC and JBTM exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Generac Holdings (GNRC) do?
Generac Holdings is the leading US manufacturer of backup power systems, best known for automatic home standby generators that switch on when the grid goes down. The company also builds commercial and industrial (C&I) generators, mobile power and lighting equipment, portable generators, and a growing line of residential energy technology such as battery storage, solar inverters, and grid-services software. As of March 2026 Generac reorganized its reporting into two segments, Residential and Commercial & Industrial, reflecting how management now runs a unified home-energy business alongside a consolidated global C&I operation. Demand for its core product is driven by grid reliability concerns, aging electrical infrastructure, and more frequent severe weather, which makes power-outage activity a major swing factor in results.
What does JBT Marel Corporation (JBTM) do?
JBT Marel Corporation (formerly John Bean Technologies) is a leading technology and equipment supplier to the food and beverage industry, operating in more than 30 countries. It sells processing, preparation, preservation, packaging, and automation systems across poultry, meat, fish, pet food, prepared foods, and beverages, and generates a meaningful and growing share of revenue from recurring aftermarket parts, service, and software. The company reorganized around two reportable segments, Protein Solutions and Prepared Food and Beverage Solutions, after closing its roughly $4.4 billion acquisition of Marel hf. in early 2025 and rebranding as JBT Marel.
GNRC vs JBTM: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- GNRC drivers: Data center and C&I backup power; Home standby generators and grid reliability.
- JBTM drivers: Marel merger integration and synergies; Recurring aftermarket and software.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Generac's residential business is cyclical and weather-driven: a year with low power-outage activity, as in 2025, can depress home standby demand and pressure results, while the timing and severity of storm seasons are outside the company's control. For JBTM, the business is cyclical and tied to capital-spending decisions by food processors, so orders can soften in a downturn.
GNRC or JBTM: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick GNRC if you believe its drivers more; JBTM if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the GNRC and JBTM guides.
GNRC vs JBTM: the full fundamentals
GNRC. Generac's FY2025 net income of about $160 million fell roughly 51% from the prior year, but much of that drop reflects a one-time legal settlement provision of about $104.5 million rather than a collapse in the underlying business. The high trailing P/E near 77x is distorted by that charge, which is why the forward P/E in the mid-20s is a cleaner read on how the market values expected earnings. The premium multiple reflects optimism about data center growth and a recovery in outage-driven residential demand.
JBTM. JBT Marel guided full-year 2026 revenue of roughly $3.99 to $4.07 billion with an adjusted EBITDA margin of about 17.0 to 17.5 percent. The trailing earnings multiple is elevated, reflecting expectations that merger synergies and margin gains will drive profit growth. Published analyst price targets have ranged widely, from around $100 to $170.
Headline figures (approximate, JUNE 2026): GNRC shows revenue (fy2025) ~$4.2 billion, net income (fy2025) ~$160 million (cut by a ~$104M legal settlement), revenue (q1 2026) ~$1.06 billion (up ~12% year over year), adjusted eps (q1 2026) ~$1.80; JBTM shows revenue (ttm) ~$3.9B, market cap ~$6.9B, q1 2026 revenue ~$936M (+10% YoY), adj. ebitda margin (q1 2026) ~15.2%.
The bottom line: GNRC vs JBTM
GNRC and JBTM are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined GNRC and JBTM exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how GNRC or JBTM fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Generac Holdings with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how GNRC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between GNRC and JBTM?
+
Generac Holdings is the leading US manufacturer of backup power systems, best known for automatic home standby generators that switch on when the grid goes down. JBT Marel Corporation (formerly John Bean Technologies) is a leading technology and equipment supplier to the food and beverage industry, operating in more than 30 countries. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is GNRC or JBTM the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. GNRC is the larger incumbent; JBTM is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, GNRC or JBTM?
+
On forward P/E (as of September 2026), GNRC trades at 15.35x and JBTM at 12.56x, so JBTM is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both GNRC and JBTM?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of GNRC vs JBTM?
+
GNRC: Generac's residential business is cyclical and weather-driven: a year with low power-outage activity, as in 2025, can depress home standby demand and pressure results, while the timing and severity of storm seasons are outside the company's control. The stock trades at a premium valuation (a high trailing P/E, partly distorted by a one-time legal settlement, and a forward P/E in the mid-20s), so disappointment on data center execution, outage activity, or margins can drive sharp share-price declines. Competition is intense across generators (Cummins, Caterpillar, Kohler, Briggs & Stratton) and energy storage (Tesla, Enphase, SolarEdge, Franklin). Generac also faces supply-chain, tariff, and input-cost exposure, legal and warranty risks (it took a large settlement provision in 2025), and the possibility that newer energy-technology bets take longer than expected to become meaningfully profitable. JBTM: The business is cyclical and tied to capital-spending decisions by food processors, so orders can soften in a downturn. The Marel integration carries execution risk, and failing to realize the targeted synergies or margin expansion would pressure a stock that already trades at an elevated earnings multiple. Debt taken on for the acquisition raises interest and refinancing sensitivity, and a large share of revenue is international, exposing results to foreign-exchange swings (a 6 percent FX tailwind flattered Q1 2026 growth). End-market concentration in protein and reliance on continued equipment demand add further variability.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell GNRC or JBTM; figures are approximate and dated (as of September 2026). Verify current data before investing.