HONA vs RTX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
RTX is the larger of the two ($290.06B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (27.55x forward earnings, beta 0.30). HONA is the smaller challenger ($65.52B), cheaper on forward earnings (20.74x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
HONA vs RTX: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | HONA | RTX | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $65.52B | $290.06B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 20.74 | 27.55 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 43.43 | 37.89 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 14% of range | 91% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
Reading it: HONA is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how HONA and RTX affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. HONA and RTX share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined HONA and RTX exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Honeywell Aerospace (HONA) do?
Honeywell Aerospace Inc. (Nasdaq: HONA) is one of the largest publicly traded aerospace and defense suppliers, providing propulsion engines, auxiliary power units, avionics, flight-management and navigation systems, wheels and brakes, and connected aircraft services across commercial airlines, business aviation, defense, and space customers. It became a standalone company on June 29, 2026 when Honeywell completed the tax-free spin-off of its aerospace segment, distributing one HONA share for every two Honeywell (HON) shares; the remaining company continues as Honeywell Technologies, a pure-play automation business, alongside the earlier Solstice Advanced Materials (SOLS) spin-off. The company reported roughly $17.4 billion in 2025 net sales with about 12% organic growth and around $2.7 billion of net income.
What does RTX Corporation (RTX) do?
RTX Corporation (RTX), formerly Raytheon Technologies, is one of the world's largest aerospace and defense companies. It operates three businesses. Collins Aerospace supplies avionics, interiors, actuation, and other systems for commercial and military aircraft. Pratt & Whitney designs and manufactures jet engines for airliners (including the geared turbofan) and military aircraft, and earns substantial recurring revenue from servicing its large installed engine base. Raytheon, the defense segment, builds missiles, missile defense systems (including Patriot), radars, and other advanced defense electronics for the US military and allied governments.
HONA vs RTX: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- HONA drivers: Aftermarket recurring revenue; Defense and space demand.
- RTX drivers: Commercial aftermarket; Defense backlog and missiles.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The company carries a heavy debt load from the spin-off, roughly $16 billion in notes plus committed credit facilities, which raises interest costs and financial risk if cash flow softens. For RTX, rTX faces program-execution risks, most visibly the Pratt & Whitney geared-turbofan powder-metal inspection issue that forced costly engine removals and weighed on cash.
HONA or RTX: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick HONA if you believe its drivers more; RTX if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the HONA and RTX guides.
HONA vs RTX: the full fundamentals
HONA. As of July 2026, HONA traded around $247 per share with a market capitalization near $78 billion and roughly 317 million shares outstanding, shortly after its June 29, 2026 spin-off and subsequent addition to the S&P 500. Reported price-to-earnings figures varied widely across data providers in the first weeks of trading as adjusted and GAAP earnings were reconciled. These figures reflect early standalone reporting and may be restated as the company establishes its independent financial history.
RTX. RTX trades as a large, dividend-paying aerospace and defense blue chip valued on its huge backlog, recurring aftermarket revenue, and dual commercial-defense exposure rather than rapid growth. Its multiple reflects steady, cash-generative franchises balanced against program-execution risk like the geared-turbofan issue, with the dividend and backlog supporting the shares.
Headline figures (approximate, JULY 2026): HONA shows 2025 net sales ~$17.4B, 2025 net income ~$2.7B, 2025 organic growth ~12%, market cap ~$78B; RTX shows revenue (ttm) ~$80 billion, operating margin ~10-12%, backlog Very large (over $200 billion, commercial plus defense), net income (ttm) Several billion dollars.
The bottom line: HONA vs RTX
HONA and RTX are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined HONA and RTX exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how HONA or RTX fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Honeywell Aerospace with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how HONA fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between HONA and RTX?
+
Honeywell Aerospace Inc. RTX Corporation (RTX), formerly Raytheon Technologies, is one of the world's largest aerospace and defense companies. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is HONA or RTX the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. RTX is the larger incumbent; HONA is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, HONA or RTX?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), HONA trades at 20.74x and RTX at 27.55x, so HONA is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both HONA and RTX?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of HONA vs RTX?
+
HONA: The company carries a heavy debt load from the spin-off, roughly $16 billion in notes plus committed credit facilities, which raises interest costs and financial risk if cash flow softens. Commercial aerospace is cyclical and exposed to airline capital budgets, aircraft build rates, and supply-chain constraints, any of which can pressure original-equipment volumes. As a newly standalone entity, HONA has a limited independent operating history and must stand up its own functions and cost structure. It faces much larger and well-capitalized competitors in engines, avionics, and defense. Program delays, defense-budget shifts, and macro or geopolitical shocks to air travel could all weigh on results. RTX: RTX faces program-execution risks, most visibly the Pratt & Whitney geared-turbofan powder-metal inspection issue that forced costly engine removals and weighed on cash. Defense contracts can carry fixed-price exposure, supply-chain and labor pressures, and dependence on government budgets and procurement timing. Commercial aerospace is cyclical and sensitive to airline health, fuel prices, and travel demand. Large pension, warranty, and regulatory liabilities add complexity, and the stock can be hit by single-program problems given its size. Geopolitical shifts cut both ways: they support defense demand but introduce export-control and policy risk. Margins depend on disciplined execution across many long-cycle programs.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell HONA or RTX; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.