ILPT vs REXR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
REXR is the larger of the two ($8.64B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (39.97x forward earnings, beta 1.23). ILPT is the smaller challenger ($574.68M), priced similarly on forward earnings (-9.78x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
ILPT vs REXR: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | ILPT | REXR | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $574.68M | $8.64B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | -9.78 | 39.97 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Beta | 2.50 | 1.23 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 82% of range | 46% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 1.25 | 1.14 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Before you buy: how ILPT and REXR affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ILPT and REXR share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ILPT and REXR exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Industrial Logistics Properties Trust (ILPT) do?
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is a REIT that owns industrial and logistics real estate, primarily warehouses and distribution centers leased to a mix of tenants, along with a distinctive Hawaii portfolio of mostly ground-leased land parcels. It is externally managed by The RMR Group rather than by its own in-house team, which is a structural feature to understand because management fees and related-party dynamics differ from internally managed peers. Roughly three-quarters of its annualized rental revenue comes from investment-grade tenants, subsidiaries of investment-grade-rated entities, or those Hawaii land leases, which tend to carry very long terms, minimal operating expenses, and built-in rent increases. Portfolio occupancy has been strong, running in the mid-90s in 2025 and reported above 98% in 2026, with meaningful rent roll-ups on renewals.
What does Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) do?
Rexford Industrial Realty is a self-managed real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and repositions industrial properties (warehouses, distribution, and light-manufacturing space) exclusively in the infill submarkets of Southern California. As of the first quarter of 2026 the portfolio spanned roughly 414 properties and about 50.4 million rentable square feet, leased to a diverse tenant base at a same-property occupancy near 96%. The company's thesis rests on the region being the fourth-largest industrial market globally, with structurally low supply (regulatory and land constraints make new construction hard) and historically strong tenant demand.
ILPT vs REXR: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- ILPT drivers: Refinancing floating-rate debt into fixed; High occupancy and rent roll-ups.
- REXR drivers: Supply-constrained core market; Embedded rent mark-to-market.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The dominant risk is leverage. For REXR, the dominant risk is concentration: Rexford is almost entirely exposed to a single regional economy, so a downturn in Southern California logistics, port volumes, or manufacturing hits the whole portfolio at once.
ILPT or REXR: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick ILPT if you believe its drivers more; REXR if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ILPT and REXR guides.
ILPT vs REXR: the full fundamentals
ILPT. These are qualitative, approximate framings tied to the asOf date, not precise live figures; confirm current numbers before acting. For a leveraged REIT, the low FFO multiple partly reflects balance-sheet risk rather than a clear bargain: a cheap multiple can persist if deleveraging stalls or rates stay high. The most important things to track are refinancing outcomes, leverage ratios, occupancy, and the dividend, more than any single quarter's headline earnings.
REXR. Rexford beat estimates in the first quarter of 2026 (net income of about $87.9 million, or $0.38 per diluted share) and raised full-year Core FFO guidance on the back of record leasing and buybacks. The stock trades at a premium multiple (a high-20s price-to-AFFO and a P/E in the high 30s), reflecting asset quality rather than rapid growth. Core FFO per share was roughly flat to slightly down year over year as the Southern California market softened.
Headline figures (approximate, Jul 2026): ILPT shows revenue trend Rental income is relatively stable and occupancy-driven; recent quarters showed high occupancy (reported above 98% in 2026) with rent roll-ups on renewals. Figures are approximate; verify live., ffo (funds from operations) Normalized FFO per share reportedly rose sharply into 2026 (one estimate around $1.14 for 2026, implying roughly 20% year-over-year growth). FFO, not net income, is the key REIT earnings metric. Approximate; verify live., balance sheet / leverage Elevated. Net debt to assets reported near 68.8% with a high debt-to-EBITDA multiple. This is the defining feature of the stock. Approximate; verify live., profitability REIT cash flow is real, but heavy interest expense consumes a large share of it; net income can be thin or negative even when FFO is positive. Verify current figures.; REXR shows market cap ~$7.7B, share price ~$35-36, revenue (ttm) ~$975M, q1 2026 revenue ~$245M.
The bottom line: ILPT vs REXR
ILPT and REXR are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ILPT and REXR exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how ILPT or REXR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Industrial Logistics Properties Trust with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how ILPT fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between ILPT and REXR?
+
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust is a REIT that owns industrial and logistics real estate, primarily warehouses and distribution centers leased to a mix of tenants, along with a distinctive Hawaii portfolio of mostly ground-leased land parcels. Rexford Industrial Realty is a self-managed real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and repositions industrial properties (warehouses, distribution, and light-manufacturing space) exclusively in the infill submarkets of Southern California. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is ILPT or REXR the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. REXR is the larger incumbent; ILPT is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, ILPT or REXR?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), ILPT trades at -9.78x and REXR at 39.97x, so ILPT is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both ILPT and REXR?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of ILPT vs REXR?
+
ILPT: The dominant risk is leverage. ILPT carries a very large debt load relative to its assets and earnings, so even modest declines in property values, rents, or refinancing terms can pressure the equity heavily, and a high debt-to-EBITDA multiple leaves limited cushion. Interest-rate moves matter enormously: while the recent refinancing pushed debt toward fixed rate, future maturities (including at the JV level) must be refinanced at whatever rates prevail, and higher-for-longer rates would raise costs. The external management structure under The RMR Group introduces potential conflicts of interest and fee dynamics that internally managed peers avoid. The dividend, while recently raised, has been cut sharply in the past and could be adjusted again if cash flow tightens. Finally, a broader slowdown in industrial demand, tenant defaults, or a stalled deleveraging plan would each weigh on a company with this little balance-sheet margin for error. REXR: The dominant risk is concentration: Rexford is almost entirely exposed to a single regional economy, so a downturn in Southern California logistics, port volumes, or manufacturing hits the whole portfolio at once. In early 2026 the infill market saw negative net absorption and rising vacancy, and total portfolio NOI declined year over year, showing the cycle can turn against even scarce assets. Higher interest rates raise borrowing and refinancing costs for a capital-intensive REIT and pressure the valuations of income stocks broadly. Tariffs, port-traffic shifts, and tenant credit stress could weaken demand from the importers and distributors that fill these warehouses. Finally, the shares trade at a premium multiple to slower-growing peers, so any growth disappointment could compress the valuation.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell ILPT or REXR; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.