INTC vs LSCC: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated October 2026
Short answer
INTC is the larger of the two ($474.96B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (42.69x forward earnings, beta 2.23). LSCC is the smaller challenger ($14.69B), cheaper on forward earnings (32.24x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
INTC vs LSCC: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | INTC | LSCC | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $474.96B | $14.69B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 42.69 | 32.24 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Beta | 2.23 | 1.83 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 52% of range | 45% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 5.18 | 18.05 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: LSCC is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how INTC and LSCC affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. INTC and LSCC share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined INTC and LSCC exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Intel Corporation (INTC) do?
Intel Corporation is one of the world's largest semiconductor companies and the leading maker of x86 central processing units (CPUs), the chips that run most personal computers and a large share of data-center servers. It makes money primarily by designing and selling those processors through its client-computing and data-center segments, and it is one of the few chipmakers that both designs and manufactures its own silicon in owned fabrication plants (fabs). In recent years Intel has built that manufacturing arm into Intel Foundry, a contract business that aims to fabricate chips for external customers the way TSMC and Samsung do.
What does Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) do?
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation designs low-power, small programmable logic devices, primarily field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), which are chips customers can reconfigure after manufacture to handle control, connectivity, security, and signal-processing tasks. Unlike AMD and Intel, which chase large, high-power FPGAs, Lattice deliberately owns the low-power edge of the market with its Nexus and Avant platforms, selling into communications and compute infrastructure, industrial and automotive systems, and consumer devices. Its chips often sit quietly on circuit boards handling hardware security root-of-trust, power management, and glue logic, which gives it broad design-win diversity across thousands of customers.
INTC vs LSCC: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- INTC drivers: Intel 18A and the foundry rebuild; Data-center and AI CPU demand.
- LSCC drivers: Edge and data-center AI demand; The Avant mid-range expansion.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The dominant risk is execution: Intel is spending heavily to catch up on manufacturing, and if 18A ramps slowly, 14A slips, or yields disappoint, the foundry investment could weigh on earnings for years without delivering the external customers the thesis needs. For LSCC, semiconductor demand is cyclical, and the 2025 downturn showed how quickly customer inventory corrections can cut Lattice's revenue and margins.
INTC or LSCC: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick INTC if you believe its drivers more; LSCC if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the INTC and LSCC guides.
INTC vs LSCC: the full fundamentals
INTC. Intel has no meaningful trailing P/E because GAAP results are negative, and on forward estimates it trades near 43 times earnings and about 8.5 times trailing sales, rich for a company with margins near 39%. The 2026 rally priced in a foundry recovery that has started to show up in revenue but not yet in profits. The stock tends to react sharply to foundry milestones, customer news, capital raises and margin guidance; the next one is the Q3 report on October 29.
LSCC. Lattice is priced as a premium growth semiconductor stock, at about 23 times trailing sales and roughly 33 times forward earnings, with analysts expecting revenue to roughly double in 2026 and grow about 50% in 2027 as AMI adds to the base. The 14 analysts covering it have a mean target of about $164, well above the October 2026 price, but the multiple still assumes that growth arrives on schedule.
Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): INTC shows revenue (ttm) ~$57.0 billion, q2 2026 revenue ~$16.1 billion, up ~25% year over year, non-gaap eps (q2 2026) $0.42 vs ~$0.22 estimate, gaap net income (ttm) ~-$11.3 billion loss (Q2 2026 alone ~-$11.0 billion); LSCC shows revenue (ttm) ~$651 million (Q2 FY2026 ~$201M, up ~62% year on year), q3 fy2026 consensus ~$255 million revenue, EPS ~$0.55 (report Nov 2, 2026), gross / operating margin (gaap) ~69% / ~13%, net income (ttm, gaap) ~$36 million.
The bottom line: INTC vs LSCC
INTC and LSCC are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined INTC and LSCC exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how INTC or LSCC fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Intel Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how INTC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between INTC and LSCC?
+
Intel Corporation is one of the world's largest semiconductor companies and the leading maker of x86 central processing units (CPUs), the chips that run most personal computers and a large share of data-center servers. Lattice Semiconductor Corporation designs low-power, small programmable logic devices, primarily field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), which are chips customers can reconfigure after manufacture to handle control, connectivity, security, and signal-processing tasks. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is INTC or LSCC the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. INTC is the larger incumbent; LSCC is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, INTC or LSCC?
+
On forward P/E (as of October 2026), INTC trades at 42.69x and LSCC at 32.24x, so LSCC is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both INTC and LSCC?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of INTC vs LSCC?
+
INTC: The dominant risk is execution: Intel is spending heavily to catch up on manufacturing, and if 18A ramps slowly, 14A slips, or yields disappoint, the foundry investment could weigh on earnings for years without delivering the external customers the thesis needs. Funding the buildout already required a $20 billion share sale in 2026, and management has said more capital raising may be needed, so dilution is a live risk. TSMC has deep, trusted relationships with fabless chip designers and does not compete with them, which makes it hard for Intel to win business from companies it also rivals in design. Competition is intense on all fronts: AMD in CPUs, Nvidia in AI accelerators, Arm-based chips in servers and PCs, and TSMC and Samsung in foundry. GAAP results remain deeply negative (a trailing net loss of about $11.3 billion), margins are far below historical norms, and capital spending is high. After a run of more than 130% in 2026, the stock is also exposed to swings in sentiment toward AI chip stocks, which pushed it down about 16% in the month to October 16. LSCC: Semiconductor demand is cyclical, and the 2025 downturn showed how quickly customer inventory corrections can cut Lattice's revenue and margins. The valuation is the biggest single risk: the stock trades at a very high multiple that already assumes a strong, sustained reacceleration, so any stumble compresses it fast. The AMI acquisition adds integration, dilution, and execution risk, and moving up-market with Avant pits Lattice against much larger, better-resourced competitors in AMD and Intel. The company also depends on third-party foundries for manufacturing and is exposed to broad macro and geopolitical swings in chip demand, including export-control and China-related uncertainty. GAAP earnings are still small relative to the share price (a trailing P/E above 400), and the 22% drop over three months shows how sharply the stock reacts when sentiment on AI spending turns.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell INTC or LSCC; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.