JPM vs WFC: How JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo Compare (2026)
Last updated July 2026
Short answer
JPM is the larger of the two ($930.16B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (14.11x forward earnings, beta 0.98). WFC is the smaller challenger ($258.27B), cheaper on forward earnings (10.83x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
JPM vs WFC: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | JPM | WFC | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $930.16B | $258.27B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 14.11 | 10.83 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 15.00 | 12.40 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.98 | 0.92 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 88% of range | 50% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.63 | 1.60 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: WFC is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how JPM and WFC affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. JPM and WFC share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined JPM and WFC exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does JPMorgan Chase (JPM) do?
JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) is a leading global financial services firm with $4.4 trillion in assets, operating under the J.P. Morgan and Chase brands. The company earns revenue across four core segments: Consumer and Community Banking (retail accounts, mortgages, credit cards, and auto loans), the Commercial and Investment Bank (trading, investment banking, payments, and wholesale lending), Asset and Wealth Management (investment advisory and private banking), and Corporate. In fiscal year 2025, total net revenue reached ~$182 billion, with net interest income of ~$95 billion and noninterest revenue of ~$87 billion, while full-year net income was ~$57.5 billion and earnings per share came in at $20.02. The bank holds the number one position in U.S. retail deposit market share and is the primary bank for U.S. small businesses.
What does Wells Fargo (WFC) do?
Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is one of the largest financial institutions in the United States, with roughly $1.9-2.0 trillion in assets and operations organized into four segments: Consumer Banking and Lending (checking, savings, mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards), Commercial Banking (lending and treasury services for middle-market companies), Corporate and Investment Banking (markets trading, banking, and lending for large clients), and Wealth and Investment Management (advisory and private banking). The bank makes money in two broad ways: net interest income, the spread between what it earns on loans and securities and what it pays on deposits, which was roughly $47.7 billion in 2025, and noninterest fee income from cards, investment banking, trading, wealth management, and deposit services.
JPM vs WFC: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- JPM drivers: Scale and diversification across every part of banking; Trading and investment banking momentum.
- WFC drivers: Asset cap removal unlocks balance-sheet growth; Turnaround economics and rising returns.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most direct risk is compression in net interest income, the bank's single largest revenue line: JPMorgan already trimmed its full-year 2026 NII guidance from $104.5 billion to ~$103 billion in April 2026, and further rate cuts could reduce that figure. For WFC, wells Fargo is highly sensitive to interest rates: net interest income is its single largest revenue line (about $47.7 billion in 2025), so falling rates or deposit repricing can compress earnings, and 2025 revenue was roughly flat partly because of lower net interest income.
JPM or WFC: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick JPM if you believe its drivers more; WFC if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the JPM and WFC guides.
JPM vs WFC: the full fundamentals
JPM. JPMorgan's current TTM P/E of roughly 16x sits at the high end of its own five-year range (which averaged ~11.8x from 2021-2025) and about 23% above the broader financial services sector average, reflecting the premium investors have assigned to its scale, earnings consistency, and capital return capacity. The 20% full-year 2025 ROTCE is one of the highest among large global banks and underpins the thesis that scale and diversification translate into superior returns on equity. However, with NII guidance edged down for 2026 and credit loss provisions rising, the path to further multiple expansion is narrower than it was a year ago.
WFC. Reading a large bank means looking past a single earnings number to a handful of structural metrics. Return on tangible common equity (ROTCE) shows how efficiently the bank turns shareholder capital into profit; Wells Fargo's ~14.6% in 2025 trails best-in-class peers but is rising toward its 17-18% target. The efficiency ratio (costs as a share of revenue, running in the mid-60s percent) measures how lean the operation is, and net interest income tracks the rate-sensitive core of profitability. The CET1 ratio (~10.6%) gauges capital strength and how much room exists for buybacks and dividends, and Wells Fargo has been returning large amounts of capital. The distinctive upside here is the 2025 asset-cap removal, which lifts a structural lid on growth that constrained the bank for seven years; the open question is how much of that future growth is already reflected in the share price.
Headline figures (approximate, 2026-06-27): JPM shows revenue (ttm) ~$187 billion, full-year 2025 net revenue ~$185 billion, full-year 2025 net income ~$57.5 billion, eps (ttm) ~$20.88; WFC shows full-year 2025 total revenue ~$82 billion, full-year 2025 net income ~$21.3 billion (up ~8%), full-year 2025 diluted eps $6.26 (up ~17%), return on tangible common equity (fy2025) ~14.6% (target ~17-18% medium-term).
The bottom line: JPM vs WFC
JPM and WFC are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined JPM and WFC exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Investing in JPMorgan Chase with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how JPM fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between JPM and WFC?
+
JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) is a leading global financial services firm with $4.4 trillion in assets, operating under the J.P. Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is one of the largest financial institutions in the United States, with roughly $1.9-2.0 trillion in assets and operations organized into four segments: Consumer Banking and Lending (checking, savings, mortgages, auto loans, and credit cards), Commercial Banking (lending and treasury services for middle-market companies), Corporate and Investment Banking (markets trading, banking, and lending for large clients), and Wealth and Investment Management (advisory and private banking). They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is JPM or WFC the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. JPM is the larger incumbent; WFC is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, JPM or WFC?
+
On forward P/E (as of July 2026), JPM trades at 14.11x and WFC at 10.83x, so WFC is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both JPM and WFC?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of JPM vs WFC?
+
JPM: The most direct risk is compression in net interest income, the bank's single largest revenue line: JPMorgan already trimmed its full-year 2026 NII guidance from $104.5 billion to ~$103 billion in April 2026, and further rate cuts could reduce that figure. Credit quality in the card portfolio is a second concern, with net charge-offs of ~$2.6 billion in Q3 2025 trending higher year-over-year and 2026 charge-off guidance set at ~3.4%. CEO Jamie Dimon has repeatedly warned of geopolitical tensions, trade uncertainty, and elevated asset prices as macro risks that could trigger a broader credit cycle. Finally, JPM's P/E of ~16x is at the high end of its own decade-long history, meaning the stock offers less margin of safety if earnings disappoint relative to elevated expectations. WFC: Wells Fargo is highly sensitive to interest rates: net interest income is its single largest revenue line (about $47.7 billion in 2025), so falling rates or deposit repricing can compress earnings, and 2025 revenue was roughly flat partly because of lower net interest income. As an economically cyclical bank, it is exposed to the credit cycle, where a recession or rising unemployment would increase loan losses, particularly in cards, commercial real estate, and consumer lending. Regulatory legacy remains a factor: while the asset cap is lifted, certain consent-order provisions from the 2016 fake-accounts scandal persist and reputational and compliance costs can recur. Execution risk is real now that the cap is gone, because growing profitably without re-introducing the controls problems of the past is unproven at scale. Finally, broad macro risks (trade and geopolitical uncertainty, fiscal pressures, and market volatility) could weigh on loan demand, fee income, and the value of the bank's securities portfolio.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell JPM or WFC; figures are approximate and dated (as of July 2026). Verify current data before investing.