LCLN vs PJT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
PJT is the larger of the two ($11.04B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (18.70x forward earnings, beta 0.84). LCLN is the smaller challenger ($2.69B), cheaper on forward earnings (14.73x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
LCLN vs PJT: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | LCLN | PJT | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.69B | $11.04B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 14.73 | 18.70 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 93% of range | 60% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 6.63 | 15.99 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: LCLN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how LCLN and PJT affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. LCLN and PJT share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined LCLN and PJT exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Lincoln International, Inc. (LCLN) do?
Lincoln International advises on mergers and acquisitions in the private capital markets, working mainly for private equity firms, their portfolio companies and privately held business owners rather than for large public acquirers. The firm reports two segments. Investment Banking Advisory, which covers sell-side and buy-side M&A, private funds advisory and capital markets work, produced ~$177.7M of the ~$225.7M in second-quarter 2026 revenue. Valuations and Opinions, which marks illiquid private holdings for fund managers and writes fairness opinions, contributed the other ~$47.9M and behaves more like a subscription than a deal fee. Roughly ~1,450 professionals work from more than ~30 offices across ~14 countries, and the firm counts ~162 Managing Directors. Its October 2025 purchase of MarshBerry, an advisory and consulting business focused on the insurance and wealth-management sectors, added ~$210M of goodwill and explains a visible share of the recent growth rate.
What does PJT Partners (PJT) do?
PJT Partners is an independent, advisory-focused investment bank founded by longtime dealmaker Paul J. Taubman and carved out of Blackstone in 2015. It earns fees, not spread or trading income, across three businesses: Strategic Advisory (mergers and acquisitions, capital markets, and shareholder advisory), Restructuring and Special Situations (where it ranks as a top worldwide restructuring adviser), and PJT Park Hill (a leading placement agent and private-capital-solutions adviser to alternative asset managers). The mix is deliberately balanced so that counter-cyclical restructuring work can cushion softer M&A years.
LCLN vs PJT: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- LCLN drivers: Sponsor M&A is thawing; Valuations and Opinions is the ballast.
- PJT drivers: Strategic Advisory scaling; Restructuring leadership.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Advisory revenue is cyclical and lumpy, and a stall in private equity exit activity would hit the segment generating roughly four fifths of the top line. For PJT, pJT's revenue is tied to transaction activity, so a slowdown in M&A, capital markets, or credit stress can swing results sharply from year to year.
LCLN or PJT: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick LCLN if you believe its drivers more; PJT if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the LCLN and PJT guides.
LCLN vs PJT: the full fundamentals
LCLN. At roughly ~$25.6 a share across ~102.2M total shares in all three classes, Lincoln carries a market value near ~$2.6B, or about ~3x trailing revenue. The trailing P/E near ~5.7 quoted by most data providers divides a post-IPO share count into pre-IPO partnership earnings, so it reflects an accounting structure that no longer exists. Revenue of ~$772M in fiscal 2025 and ~$572M in fiscal 2024 is the cleaner growth comparison, because the reorganization changed the expense lines while leaving the top line untouched.
PJT. PJT combines double-digit revenue growth with a premium valuation that sits well above independent advisory peers such as Evercore, Moelis, and Lazard, which trade in the mid-teens to mid-20s on earnings. The higher multiple reflects the market's expectation of continued mandate growth and margin resilience, and it makes PJT more sensitive to any shift in deal-cycle momentum.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): LCLN shows revenue (ttm) ~$874M, q2 2026 revenue ~$226M, up ~51% year over year, q2 2026 diluted eps, gaap vs adjusted ~$0.01 vs ~$0.26, adjusted compensation ratio (q2 2026) ~61% of revenue; PJT shows revenue (ttm) ~$1.8B, fy2025 revenue ~$1.71B (+15% YoY), q1 2026 revenue ~$418M (+29% YoY), market cap ~$6.9B.
The bottom line: LCLN vs PJT
LCLN and PJT are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined LCLN and PJT exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how LCLN or PJT fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Lincoln International, Inc. with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how LCLN fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between LCLN and PJT?
+
Lincoln International advises on mergers and acquisitions in the private capital markets, working mainly for private equity firms, their portfolio companies and privately held business owners rather than for large public acquirers. PJT Partners is an independent, advisory-focused investment bank founded by longtime dealmaker Paul J. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is LCLN or PJT the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. PJT is the larger incumbent; LCLN is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, LCLN or PJT?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), LCLN trades at 14.73x and PJT at 18.70x, so LCLN is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both LCLN and PJT?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of LCLN vs PJT?
+
LCLN: Advisory revenue is cyclical and lumpy, and a stall in private equity exit activity would hit the segment generating roughly four fifths of the top line. The Up-C structure hides complications behind a simple share count: only ~34.8M of the ~102.2M total shares are publicly traded Class A stock, a Tax Receivable Agreement obligation of ~$84.8M sits on the balance sheet, and the firm qualifies as a controlled company under NYSE rules, so it is not required to maintain a majority independent board. Float will keep growing as lock-ups expire and LILP units convert into Class A stock, and the company already issued ~1.43M additional Class A shares on August 12, 2026 to former partners under an obligation disclosed in the prospectus. Compensation is both the largest cost and the hardest to hold down, since retaining producers competes directly against margin. The public record is genuinely thin: the quarter ended June 30, 2026 produced the first Form 10-Q, no annual report has been filed yet, and the company stated in that filing that it is not currently a party to any material litigation. PJT: PJT's revenue is tied to transaction activity, so a slowdown in M&A, capital markets, or credit stress can swing results sharply from year to year. The firm is highly dependent on retaining and recruiting senior bankers, and its economics are shaped by a large compensation ratio that limits margin expansion. There is meaningful key-person and reputational exposure to founder Paul Taubman and a handful of star partners. Competition for talent and mandates from Evercore, Moelis, Lazard, Centerview, and the bulge brackets is intense. Finally, the stock trades at a premium earnings multiple relative to advisory peers, which leaves less room for error if growth decelerates.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell LCLN or PJT; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.