LUNR vs SPCX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated October 2026
Short answer
SPCX is the larger of the two ($1.92T market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (73.46x forward earnings). LUNR is the smaller challenger ($1.74B), priced similarly on forward earnings (-69.55x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
LUNR vs SPCX: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | LUNR | SPCX | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.74B | $1.92T | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | -69.55 | 73.46 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 8% of range | 34% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
Before you buy: how LUNR and SPCX affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. LUNR and SPCX share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined LUNR and SPCX exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Intuitive Machines (LUNR) do?
Intuitive Machines (LUNR) is a space-exploration company focused on lunar access and infrastructure. It is best known for its Nova-C lunar lander, which made a notable soft landing on the Moon, the first by a commercial company. The business is built around NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services program and related government contracts, delivering payloads to the lunar surface and pursuing adjacent opportunities in lunar data relay and communications, orbital services, and space infrastructure. Since late 2025 it has also owned a satellite-manufacturing operation in Palo Alto, California, which builds spacecraft buses for commercial, civil and national security customers (it has built 13 spacecraft for SiriusXM, and in September 2026 announced an order for two IM 300 platforms from a new customer). That addition lifted revenue to about $490 million over the trailing twelve months, with the June 2026 quarter roughly four times the year-earlier level. The company is still not profitable: trailing net loss is about $131 million, and the June quarter's loss of $0.16 per share was wider than the $0.07 analysts expected. Intuitive Machines went public in 2023 via a SPAC merger and is headquartered in Houston, Texas. It remains a small, speculative space stock whose value depends on winning and executing missions and spacecraft orders, on the pace of NASA's Artemis and lunar programs, and on government and commercial demand for cislunar services. Mission risk is high, and outcomes can swing sharply on the success or failure of individual landings.
What does Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX) do?
SpaceX, formally Space Exploration Technologies Corp., is the largest launch provider in the world and the operator of the largest satellite-broadband constellation. It listed on Nasdaq under SPCX in June 2026 in the largest IPO on record by proceeds, after more than twenty years as a private company. It employs roughly 22,000 people and is classified in Aerospace and Defense.
LUNR vs SPCX: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- LUNR drivers: Lunar lander franchise; Satellite manufacturing and cislunar infrastructure.
- SPCX drivers: Satellite broadband is the revenue engine; Direct-to-device and carrier partnerships.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Space missions carry high technical risk; a single failed landing or anomaly can damage the stock and future contract prospects, and not every mission succeeds fully. For SPCX, spaceX is not profitable: net margin ran around negative 36 percent on roughly $23 billion of trailing revenue, with a trailing net loss of about $8.9 billion, even though EBITDA of about $5.9 billion is positive and the trailing operating margin is close to break-even at about -1.8 percent.
LUNR or SPCX: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick LUNR if you believe its drivers more; SPCX if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the LUNR and SPCX guides.
LUNR vs SPCX: the full fundamentals
LUNR. Intuitive Machines is difficult to value on earnings because it still loses money and results swing with mission timing and spacecraft deliveries. At about 3.6 times trailing sales, after a roughly 38% fall in 2026, the stock prices in meaningful growth from satellite manufacturing and lunar contracts. Analysts expect revenue near $920 million for 2026 and continued losses into 2027, so LUNR remains a speculative, scenario-driven valuation that moves sharply on mission news and contract awards.
SPCX. SpaceX is valued as a growth company rather than an aerospace contractor, and the gap is stark: the defense primes trade on single-digit to low-double-digit multiples of earnings, while SPCX trades at roughly 83 times trailing sales and about 73 times forward earnings. Gross margin near 52 percent reflects the subscription mix in Connectivity, and the trailing operating margin has moved close to break-even, but the net result is still a loss because depreciation and development costs are large. The forward multiple depends on consensus EPS rising from about $0.09 in 2026 to about $2.08 in 2027; 31 analysts carry a mean target near $221 against a price of about $146.
Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): LUNR shows revenue (ttm) ~$490 million (June 2026 quarter up ~310% year over year), margins (ttm) Gross ~16%, operating ~-18%, net ~-27%, net income (ttm) ~-$131 million; EPS ~-$0.95, p/e ratio Not meaningful (losses); forward P/E negative; SPCX shows revenue (ttm) ~$23.0 billion, revenue growth (q2 2026) ~92% year over year, on ~$7.81 billion of quarterly revenue, margins (ttm) ~52% gross, ~-1.8% operating, ~-36% net, net loss (ttm) ~-$8.9 billion; Q2 2026 EPS ~-$0.09 vs ~-$0.29 expected.
The bottom line: LUNR vs SPCX
LUNR and SPCX are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined LUNR and SPCX exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how LUNR or SPCX fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Intuitive Machines with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how LUNR fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between LUNR and SPCX?
+
Intuitive Machines (LUNR) is a space-exploration company focused on lunar access and infrastructure. SpaceX, formally Space Exploration Technologies Corp., is the largest launch provider in the world and the operator of the largest satellite-broadband constellation. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is LUNR or SPCX the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. SPCX is the larger incumbent; LUNR is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, LUNR or SPCX?
+
On forward P/E (as of October 2026), LUNR trades at -69.55x and SPCX at 73.46x, so LUNR is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both LUNR and SPCX?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of LUNR vs SPCX?
+
LUNR: Space missions carry high technical risk; a single failed landing or anomaly can damage the stock and future contract prospects, and not every mission succeeds fully. Revenue is lumpy and contract-driven, margins are thin (gross margin about 16%, operating margin about -18% TTM), and the company is not profitable, so it depends on capital markets and faces dilution risk. Debt of about $481 million now exceeds cash of about $367 million, and free cash flow was about -$80 million TTM. Integrating a satellite-manufacturing business adds execution risk on fixed-price spacecraft programs. The company remains heavily reliant on NASA and government funding, which is subject to budget cycles and political shifts. Competition includes other commercial landers, satellite builders and far larger aerospace players. As a small-cap SPAC-origin stock, LUNR is highly volatile: it has traded between about $7.78 and $46.75 over the past 52 weeks and fell about 21% in the month to October 16, 2026. There is real risk of permanent capital loss. SPCX: SpaceX is not profitable: net margin ran around negative 36 percent on roughly $23 billion of trailing revenue, with a trailing net loss of about $8.9 billion, even though EBITDA of about $5.9 billion is positive and the trailing operating margin is close to break-even at about -1.8 percent. The IPO left roughly $100 billion of cash against about $40 billion of debt, which removes near-term funding pressure but does not change the capital intensity of the constellation buildout. Valuation is demanding at roughly 83 times trailing sales and about 73 times forward earnings, which leaves little room for disappointment, and consensus already assumes revenue rising to about $45 billion in 2026 and $116 billion in 2027. The public record is very short, with the shares listed only since June 2026, so there is far less disclosure history than for the established primes and the 52-week range is not a full year of trading. Vertical integration concentrates risk as well as advantage: a launch failure, a regulatory decision on spectrum or orbital slots, or a constellation problem lands on launch, connectivity, and manufacturing at once rather than on one segment. Competition in satellite broadband is intensifying from other constellations and from well-funded entrants, and speculation about a combination with Tesla adds a governance question that the company has not addressed.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell LUNR or SPCX; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.