MAC vs SPG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

MAC and SPG are similarly sized, but SPG trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (34.03x vs 617.75x): the market is paying up for MAC's profile and pricing SPG more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.

MAC vs SPG: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricMACSPGWhat it tells you
Forward P/E617.7534.03Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Beta2.071.33Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range82% of range88% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book2.4815.44How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: SPG is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how MAC and SPG affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. MAC and SPG share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined MAC and SPG exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does The Macerich Company (MAC) do?

The Macerich Company, founded in 1964 and headquartered in Santa Monica, California, owns, leases and redevelops regional town centers in dense, higher-income US markets. Its holdings cluster in California, the Pacific Northwest, the Phoenix and Scottsdale corridor, and the stretch from metro New York to Washington, DC, with flagships including Tysons Corner Center, Queens Center, Scottsdale Fashion Square, Washington Square and Green Acres Mall. After several years of selling and handing back weaker assets, the portfolio sat at roughly 38 to 39 retail centers and about 40 million square feet as of the second quarter of 2026, down from 48 million square feet earlier in the program. Trailing 12-month tenant sales for spaces under 10,000 square feet reached about $919 per square foot, up from roughly $849 a year earlier, and trailing revenue runs near $1.03 billion.

Full MAC guide

What does Simon Property Group (SPG) do?

Simon Property Group is an Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust (REIT) and an S&P 100 constituent. It owns, develops, and manages premier shopping, dining, entertainment, and mixed-use destinations across North America, Europe, and Asia. As of December 31, 2025, the company held interests in 212 US income-producing properties and 42 international properties, along with a 22.2% stake in Klépierre, a Paris-based retail real estate company. SPG makes money primarily by leasing space to retail, dining, and entertainment tenants at its malls and Premium Outlets, collecting base rent plus a share of tenant sales. With a gross margin near 86% and domestic mall and outlet occupancy of approximately 96%, the business model benefits from scale: SPG's size gives it access to lower-cost capital, stronger lease negotiation leverage with global retail chains, and the financial capacity to fund redevelopments that smaller operators cannot.

Full SPG guide

MAC vs SPG: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • MAC drivers: Deleveraging toward the 6x goal; The signed-not-open rent pipeline.
  • SPG drivers: Premium Portfolio with Near-Full Occupancy; Consistent NOI and FFO Growth.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. For SPG, the most significant structural risk is continued e-commerce penetration that gradually reduces the number of viable retail tenants and pressures occupancy and rents even at premium properties.

MAC or SPG: which should you pick?

Pick MAC if you believe its drivers more; SPG if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the MAC and SPG guides.

MAC vs SPG: the full fundamentals

MAC. FFO per share has been close to flat while total FFO rose, because the 2026 equity raises expanded the denominator faster than the operating recovery expanded the numerator. Management's public bridge to $1.80 to $2.00 of 2028 FFO per share leans on the signed-not-open rent pipeline, cheaper refinancing as leverage falls, and yield on the Annapolis and redevelopment spend. Against that target the current price sits near 13 times, so the multiple is doing less work than the execution is.

SPG. Because SPG is a REIT, Funds from Operations (FFO) is the industry-standard profitability metric rather than GAAP net income, which is inflated by depreciation add-backs and one-time gains. The trailing GAAP P/E of roughly 14x looks inexpensive relative to the company's 10-year average of about 22x, but the more meaningful forward price-to-Real Estate FFO multiple is in the low-to-mid teens, broadly in line with high-quality retail REIT peers. The company's ~$29 billion debt load is large in absolute terms but is supported by an A-rated credit profile, a $5 billion revolving credit facility, and stable NOI coverage.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): MAC shows revenue (ttm) ~$1.03B (Q2 2026: ~$249.7M, first half: ~$491.2M), ffo as adjusted per share ~$0.35 in Q2 2026 and ~$0.70 for the first half, versus ~$1.50 for full-year 2025, gaap net loss per share ~$(0.10) in Q2 2026, ~$(0.24) for the first half, net debt / adjusted ebitda ~7.3x, or ~6.8x pro forma for forward equity, against a ~6x 2028 target; SPG shows revenue (ttm) ~$6.65 billion, real estate ffo (fy 2025) ~$12.73 per diluted share, 2026 real estate ffo guidance $13.10 to $13.25 per diluted share, trailing p/e (gaap) ~14x (based on elevated 2025 GAAP earnings).

The bottom line: MAC vs SPG

MAC and SPG are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined MAC and SPG exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how MAC or SPG fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in The Macerich Company with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how MAC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between MAC and SPG?

+

The Macerich Company, founded in 1964 and headquartered in Santa Monica, California, owns, leases and redevelops regional town centers in dense, higher-income US markets. Simon Property Group is an Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust (REIT) and an S&P 100 constituent. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is MAC or SPG the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, MAC or SPG?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), MAC trades at 617.75x and SPG at 34.03x, so SPG is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both MAC and SPG?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of MAC vs SPG?

+

MAC: Dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. Tenant credit remains a live drag, with Forever 21's liquidation alone releasing about 570,000 square feet across Macerich centers and Claire's filing again in 2025, so backfilling vacancy is a permanent operating expense rather than a one-time event. Property-level debt still bites: the $76 million loan secured by Twenty Ninth Street in Boulder sat in default after its February maturity, and while a single mortgage default is not a corporate solvency issue, it shows the asset-by-asset workout is unfinished. GAAP net losses persist and the dividend, at $0.17 per quarter or roughly $0.68 annualized, was cut deeply from pre-2020 levels and is covered by FFO rather than by earnings. Finally, the valuation itself is a risk: near 16 times trailing FFO and roughly 13 times the midpoint of the company's own 2028 target, the shares already assume the plan lands close to schedule, so a missed disposition, a rate move, or a weaker consumer would hit the multiple and the estimates at the same time. SPG: The most significant structural risk is continued e-commerce penetration that gradually reduces the number of viable retail tenants and pressures occupancy and rents even at premium properties. SPG carries roughly $29 billion in debt, making it sensitive to sustained high interest rates that raise refinancing costs and compress the spread between cap rates and borrowing costs, a core driver of REIT value. A recession that weakens consumer spending could trigger tenant distress, store closures, and occupancy declines across the portfolio. Finally, the transition to new CEO Eli Simon following his father's death in March 2026 introduces near-term uncertainty around strategic continuity, capital allocation priorities, and operator relationships that had been built over three decades.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell MAC or SPG; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    MAC vs SPG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App