MCO vs SPGI: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated October 2026

Short answer

SPGI is the larger of the two ($126.66B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (21.29x forward earnings, beta 1.10). MCO is the smaller challenger ($84.00B), actually pricier on forward earnings (25.63x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

MCO vs SPGI: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricMCOSPGIWhat it tells you
Market cap$84.00B$126.66BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E25.6321.29Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E30.7826.25Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta1.351.10Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range57% of range42% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book27.774.02How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: SPGI is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how MCO and SPGI affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. MCO and SPGI share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined MCO and SPGI exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Moody's (MCO) do?

Moody's is a global integrated risk-assessment company best known for credit ratings. It operates two main segments. Moody's Investors Service (MIS) rates the creditworthiness of bonds, loans, and other debt instruments issued by corporations, governments, and structured-finance vehicles, earning fees from issuers each time debt is rated. Moody's Analytics (MA) sells subscription software, data, research, and models for credit risk, economic forecasting, regulatory compliance, and increasingly ESG and supply-chain risk. Together with S&P Global, Moody's forms half of an effective duopoly in credit ratings, an industry protected by deep regulatory entrenchment, network effects, and the trust embedded in its ratings over more than a century. The ratings business is highly profitable and cyclical with debt-issuance volumes, while Moody's Analytics provides growing, recurring subscription revenue that smooths the cycle. Founded in 1909 and headquartered in New York, Moody's is a high-margin compounder tied to the global flow of capital and debt. Over the trailing twelve months to mid-2026 it generated about $8.2 billion of revenue and $2.8 billion of net income, with an operating margin near 49%.

Full MCO guide

What does S&P Global (SPGI) do?

S&P Global is a financial-information and analytics company best known for two franchises: S&P Global Ratings, one of the big three credit-rating agencies, and S&P Dow Jones Indices, which owns benchmark stock indices including the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The company makes money from rating debt issuances (a fee tied to bond issuance activity), licensing its indices to ETFs and funds (collecting fees on the assets that track them), and selling market data, analytics, and commodity-price benchmarks. Its Market Intelligence segment provides data platforms and research to financial professionals, and S&P Global Commodity Insights (formerly Platts) sets energy and commodity price benchmarks. The 2022 merger with IHS Markit broadened its data, automotive, and analytics offerings. S&P Global benefits from durable, recurring, subscription-like revenue and high margins. Headquartered in New York City, it serves banks, asset managers, corporations, and governments worldwide. As of October 16, 2026, the shares closed near $426.58, inside a 52-week range of about $361 to $522, after falling about 12% year to date. Trailing revenue is about $16.1 billion, revenue grew about 10.4% year over year in the latest quarter, and the company earned about $4.9 billion of net income over the past twelve months. In the June 2026 quarter earnings per share of about $4.87 fell short of the roughly $5.02 consensus, the first clear miss after a $4.97 beat in the March quarter.

Full SPGI guide

MCO vs SPGI: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • MCO drivers: Ratings duopoly and pricing power; Moody's Analytics recurring revenue.
  • SPGI drivers: Index licensing and passive investing; Credit ratings and a wide moat.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The ratings segment is cyclical: debt issuance falls sharply when interest rates rise quickly or credit markets freeze, directly pressuring MIS revenue. For SPGI, ratings revenue is cyclical and tied to debt-issuance volumes, which fall when interest rates rise sharply or credit markets freeze.

MCO or SPGI: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick MCO if you believe its drivers more; SPGI if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the MCO and SPGI guides.

MCO vs SPGI: the full fundamentals

MCO. At about $482 a share on October 16, 2026, Moody's trades near 31x trailing and 25x forward earnings, a lower multiple than at the start of the year because earnings grew faster than the share price, which is down about 3% year to date. The valuation still embeds steady double-digit EPS growth and durable issuance volumes. Third-quarter results on October 21 are the next test.

SPGI. S&P Global still trades at a premium to the broad market, but at about 26 times trailing and 21 times forward earnings the premium is much smaller than the roughly 35x of early 2026. Consensus points to a softer second half, with Q3 2026 EPS expected near $4.41 and full-year 2026 EPS near $17.88, before growth of about 13% to roughly $20.19 in 2027. The 21-analyst mean target near $516 sits well above the October 16 price of about $427, a gap that reflects how far the multiple has fallen rather than a change in the franchise.

Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): MCO shows revenue (ttm) ~$8.2 billion, up ~15% year over year in the latest quarter, operating margin ~49%, net income (ttm) ~$2.8 billion, eps (ttm / forward) ~$15.76 / ~$18.93; SPGI shows revenue (ttm) ~$16.1 billion, revenue growth ~10.4% year over year in the latest quarter, operating margin (ttm) ~45% (gross margin ~71%), net income (ttm) ~$4.9 billion; EPS ~$16.37.

The bottom line: MCO vs SPGI

MCO and SPGI are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined MCO and SPGI exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how MCO or SPGI fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Moody's with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how MCO fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between MCO and SPGI?

+

Moody's is a global integrated risk-assessment company best known for credit ratings. S&P Global is a financial-information and analytics company best known for two franchises: S&P Global Ratings, one of the big three credit-rating agencies, and S&P Dow Jones Indices, which owns benchmark stock indices including the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Industrial Average. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is MCO or SPGI the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. SPGI is the larger incumbent; MCO is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, MCO or SPGI?

+

On forward P/E (as of October 2026), MCO trades at 25.63x and SPGI at 21.29x, so SPGI is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both MCO and SPGI?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of MCO vs SPGI?

+

MCO: The ratings segment is cyclical: debt issuance falls sharply when interest rates rise quickly or credit markets freeze, directly pressuring MIS revenue. Moody's also carries reputational and regulatory risk, a legacy of the 2008 financial crisis when rating agencies were criticized for structured-credit ratings; new regulation or liability rulings could weigh on the model. Competition from S&P Global, Fitch, and smaller rating providers, plus the rise of in-house and AI-driven risk tools, is a long-term consideration. The premium valuation embeds steady growth, so issuance downturns or multiple compression can hit the stock. Currency exposure and integration risk on acquisitions add further variability. Ahead of the October 21, 2026 report, RBC, Jefferies, JPMorgan and BMO all lowered price targets, and consensus for the December 2026 quarter implies EPS roughly flat to slightly down year over year, so the near-term issuance outlook is the swing factor. SPGI: Ratings revenue is cyclical and tied to debt-issuance volumes, which fall when interest rates rise sharply or credit markets freeze. Regulatory scrutiny of the rating-agency oligopoly is a recurring risk, including potential reforms to how ratings are paid for or used. The index business depends on continued passive-investing inflows and faces fee pressure as competitors and ETF issuers push for lower licensing costs. Integration of IHS Markit and ongoing acquisitions carry execution risk. The stock typically trades at a premium valuation, so any slowdown in issuance, fund flows, or data-subscription growth can compress the multiple meaningfully. The share price shows how this plays out: SPGI fell about 12% in 2026 through October 16 even as revenue grew, as the multiple compressed from roughly 35 times trailing earnings to about 26 times. Analysts expect earnings per share of about $4.41 in the September 2026 quarter, below the year-earlier $4.73, and Jefferies cut its price target to $490 from $525 in mid-October.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell MCO or SPGI; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.