NEM vs PLD: How Newmont and Prologis Compare (2026)

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. NEM and PLD share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined NEM and PLD exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Newmont (NEM) is the world's largest gold producer and a leading name in precious-metals mining. It explores for, mines, and sells gold, with meaningful byproduct production of copper, silver, zinc, and lead from a global portfolio of tier-one operations across North America, South America, Australia, Africa, and Papua New Guinea. Gold is the company's core driver, and its revenue and profits move closely with the gold price, which it does not control and which tends to rise with inflation fears, falling real interest rates, and market or geopolitical stress. Newmont expanded its scale and reserves through the 2023 acquisition of Newcrest Mining and has since worked to streamline the combined portfolio around its highest-quality, longest-life assets while returning cash through dividends and buybacks. As a commodity producer, Newmont's earnings swing with gold and byproduct prices as well as mining costs. Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, it is widely viewed as a large-cap, liquid way to gain equity exposure to gold, often held as a diversifier or an inflation and safe-haven hedge rather than as a steady compounder.

Full NEM guide

Prologis (NYSE: PLD) is a self-administered, self-managed real estate investment trust focused exclusively on industrial and logistics properties. The company owns and operates approximately 1.3 billion square feet across roughly 5,882 buildings in 20 countries, with a strong concentration in high-barrier, last-mile markets in North America, Europe, and Asia. Revenue comes primarily from long-term leases on warehouse, distribution center, and fulfillment facility space, supplemented by a Strategic Capital segment that manages approximately $60 billion in third-party assets on behalf of institutional co-investment partners. Rental income is the dominant and most stable revenue stream, while strategic capital fees (including periodic promote income) add a more variable layer of earnings.

Full PLD guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• NEM drivers: Leveraged exposure to gold; Scale, tier-one assets, and reserves.
• PLD drivers: E-Commerce as a Structural Tailwind; Reshoring and Supply Chain Reconfiguration.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Newmont is a commodity producer, so its revenue and profits swing with the gold price and byproduct metal prices it does not control, and those prices can fall sharply. For PLD, the primary bear case centers on the interest rate environment: Prologis carries a debt-to-EBITDA ratio near 5x, and sustained elevated rates could raise refinancing costs, expand capitalization rates, and compress net asset values even if occupancy holds.

Pick NEM if you believe its drivers more; PLD if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the NEM and PLD guides.

NEM. Newmont's valuation is inherently cyclical because earnings move with the gold price and mining costs the company does not fully control. A normal P/E can look low near the top of the gold cycle and high or not meaningful at the bottom, so the stock often trades on the gold-price outlook, real interest rates, and cost trends rather than trailing earnings. Rising all-in sustaining costs can compress margins even when gold is firm. Figures are approximate and move with commodity prices; verify current numbers before relying on them.

PLD. For industrial REITs, Core Funds from Operations (Core FFO) is a more relevant cash-flow metric than GAAP net earnings, as GAAP figures are affected by depreciation, gains on property sales, and promote income timing. PLD's trailing GAAP P/E of approximately 37x is roughly 50% above the broader real estate sector average, reflecting the market's premium for its scale, portfolio quality, and long-term demand drivers. The dividend payout ratio on a GAAP earnings basis exceeds 100%, which is normal for REITs given depreciation, but coverage on a Core FFO basis remains comfortable.

Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): NEM shows revenue (ttm) ~$20 billion (varies with gold prices), primary product gold, with byproduct copper, silver, zinc, and lead, gold production (2025) ~5.9 million attributable ounces, gold aisc (2025) ~$1,358 per ounce by-product basis; guided higher for 2026; PLD shows revenue (full year 2025) ~$8.79 billion, net earnings attributable to common stockholders (fy2025) ~$3.32 billion, core ffo per diluted share (fy2024, most recent full-year figure) ~$5.56, trailing p/e ratio ~37x (based on TTM EPS of ~$3.45).

NEM and PLD are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined NEM and PLD exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.