NVMI vs UAMY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
NVMI is the larger of the two ($12.34B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (29.92x forward earnings, beta 1.78). UAMY is the smaller challenger ($778.28M), actually pricier on forward earnings (49.52x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
NVMI vs UAMY: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | NVMI | UAMY | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $12.34B | $778.28M | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 29.92 | 49.52 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Beta | 1.78 | 0.41 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 41% of range | 7% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 8.89 | 5.64 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: NVMI is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how NVMI and UAMY affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. NVMI and UAMY share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined NVMI and UAMY exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Nova Ltd. (NVMI) do?
Nova Ltd. (NASDAQ and Tel Aviv: NVMI), headquartered in Rehovot, Israel, builds process-control metrology for semiconductor manufacturing. Metrology is measurement rather than inspection: instead of hunting for defects, Nova's systems characterize the dimensions, profiles, thin-film thickness, and material composition of structures on a wafer while it is still moving through the line. The portfolio splits into a Dimensional Metrology Division built on optical techniques (integrated and standalone optical critical dimension, or OCD, scatterometry) and a Materials Metrology Division built on x-ray methods, plus chemical metrology acquired with ancosys in 2022 and a modeling and analytics software layer that is arguably the real moat. A meaningful share of Nova's tools are integrated, meaning they are bolted directly onto another vendor's deposition or etch equipment, which makes Nova both a supplier to fabs and a partner to process-equipment makers. Customers are the logic foundries, memory makers, and packaging houses in Taiwan, Korea, Japan, China, and the United States, and manufacturing sits in Israel, Germany, and the United States, with a new Asian facility targeted to be operational by the end of 2026.
What does United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) do?
United States Antimony Corporation (NYSE: UAMY, also listed on NYSE Texas) has been processing antimony in Montana since 1970 and moved from NYSE American to the New York Stock Exchange in March 2026. It reports two segments. The antimony segment covers the Thompson Falls smelter in Sanders County, Montana, which turns ore into antimony oxide, metal ingots, trisulfide and a small stream of gold and silver, plus the Madero smelter in Mexico run through its USAMSA subsidiary. The zeolite segment is Bear River Zeolite in Preston, Idaho, which surface mines and sells zeolite for water filtration, soil amendment and animal feed. Around those two segments sits a widening set of early-stage assets: the restarted Stibnite Hill mine and the new Radersburg flotation mill in Montana, claims at Nolan Creek and in the Fairbanks District of Alaska, the Fostung tungsten project in Ontario, and a hydrometallurgical joint venture with Americas Gold and Silver in Idaho. The company employed ~100 full-time staff at the end of 2025.
NVMI vs UAMY: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- NVMI drivers: Gate-all-around and the rising metrology intensity of leading-edge logic; Advanced packaging and high-bandwidth memory.
- UAMY drivers: The tripled Montana smelter; Government demand as a floor.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Nova sells capital equipment into an industry that has historically swung hard in both directions, so a pause in leading-edge capex at any of the handful of customers that matter would show up in orders within a quarter or two, and the current multiple leaves little room for that. For UAMY, the antimony price cycle dominates everything.
NVMI or UAMY: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick NVMI if you believe its drivers more; UAMY if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the NVMI and UAMY guides.
NVMI vs UAMY: the full fundamentals
NVMI. Market capitalization is roughly $12.5B on about 31.8M shares outstanding, which puts the stock near a 45x forward earnings multiple against roughly 25x for the average US semiconductor name, and above Nova's own 15-year average price-to-earnings ratio of about 37x. The premium is being paid for a record set of results, not a promise: fiscal 2025 revenue of ~$880.6M grew ~31% with GAAP net income of ~$259.2M, and both 2026 quarters so far set records with margins holding in the mid-50s. The offset is a 52-week range of roughly $233 to $616, which is the market repricing the same business by more than 2x inside a year as views on the leading-edge capex cycle shift.
UAMY. The valuation rests on capacity and contracts rather than current output. Full-year 2025 revenue of ~$39.3M was itself inflated by peak antimony pricing, and the first half of 2026 came in at ~$14.7M against ~$17.5M a year earlier. Management authorized a ~$100M share repurchase on 19 August 2026, saying the board considered the stock undervalued, four months after raising ~$49.1M of equity.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): NVMI shows revenue (ttm) ~$903M (trailing figure, before the record June quarter fully rolls in), q2 2026 revenue ~$255.0M (+16% YoY, +8% QoQ, a company record), gross margin (q2 2026) ~56.5% GAAP, ~58% non-GAAP, operating margin (q2 2026) ~30% GAAP, ~33% non-GAAP; UAMY shows revenue (ttm) ~$36.4M, q2 2026 revenue ~$7.9M, down from ~$10.5M, q2 2026 gross margin ~7%, down from ~27%, net loss (ttm) ~$16.3M.
The bottom line: NVMI vs UAMY
NVMI and UAMY are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined NVMI and UAMY exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how NVMI or UAMY fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Nova Ltd. with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how NVMI fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between NVMI and UAMY?
+
Nova Ltd. United States Antimony Corporation (NYSE: UAMY, also listed on NYSE Texas) has been processing antimony in Montana since 1970 and moved from NYSE American to the New York Stock Exchange in March 2026. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is NVMI or UAMY the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. NVMI is the larger incumbent; UAMY is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, NVMI or UAMY?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), NVMI trades at 29.92x and UAMY at 49.52x, so NVMI is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both NVMI and UAMY?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of NVMI vs UAMY?
+
NVMI: Nova sells capital equipment into an industry that has historically swung hard in both directions, so a pause in leading-edge capex at any of the handful of customers that matter would show up in orders within a quarter or two, and the current multiple leaves little room for that. Concentration is real: four customers and three territories each represented at least 10% of product revenue, and China alone has been roughly 30% or more of the business even after declining from about 39%. That China exposure sits directly in the path of US, Dutch, and Japanese export controls plus tariff changes, none of which Nova controls. Operations, R&D, and a large share of manufacturing are concentrated in Israel, which carries geopolitical, mobilization, and logistics risk that the company itself flags at length in its 20-F. Competitively, KLA is far larger and holds the dominant share of metrology and inspection overall, while Onto Innovation and Camtek are pushing hard on the same advanced-packaging demand Nova is winning today, so share gains are not guaranteed to continue. Finally, the $750M convertible notes become dilutive to share count if the stock trades above the conversion price, and the shares have already traveled from roughly $233 to roughly $616 in a single year, which tells you how quickly sentiment on this name reprices. UAMY: The antimony price cycle dominates everything. European assessments peaked near ~$59,750 per tonne in July 2025 and had fallen to roughly ~$23,000 by mid-2026, which is why UAMY shares trade near ~$5.20 against a 52-week range of ~$4.14 to ~$19.71. Dilution has been heavy: shares outstanding went from ~108 million in mid-2024 to ~150.5 million at June 2026, including ~$49.1M of net equity issuance in the first half of 2026 at an average of ~$11.56 per share, well above the current quote. Share-based compensation of ~$7.7M in six months is large against ~$14.7M of revenue, and reported net income now swings on the mark-to-market value of the Larvotto stake rather than on operations. Customer concentration and Mexican operating exposure are also disclosed.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell NVMI or UAMY; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.