QSR vs WEN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

QSR is the larger of the two ($37.04B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (18.28x forward earnings, beta 0.53). WEN is the smaller challenger ($1.65B), cheaper on forward earnings (15.86x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

QSR vs WEN: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricQSRWENWhat it tells you
Market cap$37.04B$1.65BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E18.2815.86Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E20.0111.39Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.530.38Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range95% of range54% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book7.3314.27How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: WEN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how QSR and WEN affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. QSR and WEN share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined QSR and WEN exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Restaurant Brands International (QSR) do?

Restaurant Brands International Inc. was created in 2014 when Burger King and Tim Hortons combined under 3G Capital's sponsorship, and it has since added Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (2017) and Firehouse Subs (2021). As of June 30, 2026 it described itself as one of the world's largest quick-service restaurant companies, with nearly ~$49 billion of annual system-wide sales and ~33,156 restaurants in more than 120 countries, over ~95% of them franchised. The company reports six segments: four home-market franchisor segments (TH, BK, PLK and FHS covering the US and Canada), a fifth franchisor segment (INTL) for every brand everywhere else, and a sixth, Restaurant Holdings (RH), which holds the company-operated Burger King restaurants picked up in the 2024 Carrols Restaurant Group acquisition plus Popeyes China and Firehouse Subs Brazil. RH exists to be wound down: management intends to refranchise the vast majority of the Carrols restaurants and find partners for the other two, then sunset the segment. A related simplification already happened in January 2026, when RBI put Burger King China into a joint venture with CPE, which invested ~$350 million of primary capital, leaving RBI with a ~17% equity stake and royalty revenue inside INTL instead of a consolidated operating business.

Full QSR guide

What does Wendy's (WEN) do?

The Wendy's Company (Nasdaq: WEN) is the parent of the Wendy's hamburger chain, the third-largest quick-service burger system in the United States behind McDonald's and Burger King. At the end of the second quarter of 2026 the system had about 7,180 restaurants, roughly 5,724 of them in the U.S. and about 1,456 international. The model is overwhelmingly franchised: of the ~$571 million of revenue Wendy's booked in the quarter, only about $240 million came from restaurants it operates itself, with the rest arriving as franchise royalties (~$124 million), franchise fees (~$26 million), franchise rental income from properties Wendy's owns and subleases (~$53 million), and advertising fund contributions (~$127 million) that are collected and spent on marketing. Systemwide sales, the number the royalty stream is actually levered to, ran about $3.4 billion in the quarter.

Full WEN guide

QSR vs WEN: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • QSR drivers: Burger King US is doing the heavy lifting again; International is where the units and the royalty margin are.
  • WEN drivers: The royalty base is the asset, and it is currently shrinking; Project Fresh is a value and operations reset, not a remodel program.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Two of the four brands are going backwards in their home markets: Popeyes comparable sales fell ~5.1% in the quarter (~-5.2% in the US) and its segment adjusted operating income slipped to ~$63 million from ~$66 million, while Tim Hortons comparable sales were ~0.1% (~0.1% in Canada) even though TH is still the largest single AOI contributor at ~$287 million, so the group's growth depends heavily on Burger King's momentum persisting against tougher comparisons. For WEN, the core risk is that the decline is structural rather than cyclical: value-focused consumers have shifted to McDonald's and Burger King, and a 7% same-restaurant sales drop with a shrinking unit count can compound if franchisee profitability falls far enough to trigger a second wave of closures.

QSR or WEN: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick QSR if you believe its drivers more; WEN if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the QSR and WEN guides.

QSR vs WEN: the full fundamentals

QSR. Figures are approximate, tied to August 2026 and drawn from the Q2 2026 earnings release and Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2026, so verify live data before acting on any of them. Three adjustments keep the multiples honest. First, use ~454.5 million shares plus units, not ~348.8 million shares: RBI's own diluted EPS already assumes ~100% conversion of the exchangeable units under the if-converted method, which is why weighted average diluted shares were ~460 million in the quarter against ~348 million basic. Second, the ~3.8x price-to-sales ratio compares badly with pure franchisors because roughly half of reported revenue is low-margin Tim Hortons supply chain distribution and company-operated restaurant sales at the RH segment, neither of which resembles a royalty stream. Third, trailing GAAP earnings were lifted by discrete tax benefits from intra-group reorganisations and by the Burger King China deconsolidation, so adjusted diluted EPS of ~$1.93 for the first half is the cleaner read on run-rate earning power.

WEN. Enterprise value lands somewhere around $4 billion once the securitized debt is added, which against an annualized run rate near $480 million of adjusted EBITDA works out to roughly 8x to 9x, a discount to the franchised-restaurant peer group that usually trades in the teens. That discount is the market pricing a falling royalty base rather than an unrecognized bargain, and with the 2026 outlook withdrawn there is no company guidance to check it against. First-half 2026 revenue was about $1.11 billion and first-half free cash flow about $120 million, so the business still converts, which is what makes the debate about growth rate rather than survival.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): QSR shows revenue (ttm) ~$9.70 billion for the twelve months to June 30, 2026, versus ~$9.43 billion in fiscal 2025 and ~$8.41 billion in fiscal 2024; second-quarter revenue ~$2.52 billion, up ~4.6% from ~$2.41 billion, earnings Q2 2026 income from operations ~$716 million (up ~48%), net income from continuing operations ~$665 million, diluted EPS from continuing operations ~$1.45 versus ~$0.58; adjusted diluted EPS ~$1.07, up ~12.9%. First half: ~$1,110 million net income from continuing operations, ~$2.42 diluted EPS, ~$1.93 adjusted EPS. Trailing GAAP EPS ~$3.71, system scale and same-store sales ~33,156 restaurants and ~$12.70 billion of Q2 system-wide sales (up ~6.4% in constant currency), nearly ~$49 billion annualised; consolidated comparable sales ~3.8% and net restaurant growth ~2.9%. By segment: BK ~8.6%, INTL ~5.5%, FHS ~0.4%, TH ~0.1%, PLK ~-5.1%, segment profitability Q2 adjusted operating income ~$715 million and adjusted EBITDA ~$810 million: TH ~$287 million on ~$1,137 million of revenue, INTL ~$194 million on ~$274 million, BK ~$137 million on ~$397 million, PLK ~$63 million on ~$199 million, FHS ~$17 million on ~$62 million. Organic AOI growth ~6.7% in the quarter and ~8.5% for the first half, against ~8%+ full-year guidance; WEN shows revenue (ttm) ~$2.20 billion, q2 2026 revenue ~$571 million, of which ~$240 million is company-operated restaurant sales, u.s. same-restaurant sales (q2 2026) ~-7.0% (global ~-6.3%), adjusted ebitda (q2 2026) ~$124 million, with net income ~$32.6 million.

The bottom line: QSR vs WEN

QSR and WEN are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined QSR and WEN exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how QSR or WEN fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Restaurant Brands International with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how QSR fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between QSR and WEN?

+

Restaurant Brands International Inc. The Wendy's Company (Nasdaq: WEN) is the parent of the Wendy's hamburger chain, the third-largest quick-service burger system in the United States behind McDonald's and Burger King. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is QSR or WEN the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. QSR is the larger incumbent; WEN is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, QSR or WEN?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), QSR trades at 18.28x and WEN at 15.86x, so WEN is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both QSR and WEN?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of QSR vs WEN?

+

QSR: Two of the four brands are going backwards in their home markets: Popeyes comparable sales fell ~5.1% in the quarter (~-5.2% in the US) and its segment adjusted operating income slipped to ~$63 million from ~$66 million, while Tim Hortons comparable sales were ~0.1% (~0.1% in Canada) even though TH is still the largest single AOI contributor at ~$287 million, so the group's growth depends heavily on Burger King's momentum persisting against tougher comparisons. Leverage is real rather than nominal: ~$13.61 billion of total debt against ~$1.06 billion of cash leaves ~$12.55 billion net and ~4.1x adjusted EBITDA, which makes interest expense a meaningful claim on cash flow and reduces flexibility if system-wide sales stall. Because over ~95% of restaurants are franchised, franchisee profitability is effectively the credit quality of the revenue base, and commodity inflation, tariffs, labour costs and weak low-income consumer spending hit those operators before they show up in RBI's royalties. Reported results also swing with currency, since RBI reports in US dollars while collecting a large share of sales in Canadian dollars, euros, sterling and dozens of emerging-market currencies. Two legal matters are outstanding and disclosed: an antitrust class action by former Burger King employees over the old no-poach clause in the standard franchise agreement, pending in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where court-ordered mediation reached an impasse in March 2026, and a Delaware Court of Chancery suit by former Carrols shareholders over the 2024 acquisition, where the parties reached an agreement-in-principle to settle in July 2026 subject to court approval. Finally, the trailing tax rate benefited from discrete items tied to intra-group reorganisations, partly offset by OECD global minimum tax guidance, so trailing GAAP earnings per share of ~$3.71 flatter the run rate relative to adjusted diluted EPS of ~$1.93 for the first half. WEN: The core risk is that the decline is structural rather than cyclical: value-focused consumers have shifted to McDonald's and Burger King, and a 7% same-restaurant sales drop with a shrinking unit count can compound if franchisee profitability falls far enough to trigger a second wave of closures. Withdrawing the 2026 outlook removed the anchor investors were using, so estimates are unusually wide and the stock reprices hard on each quarterly print. The ~$2.72 billion securitized debt load was sized for a larger, growing system, and covenant headroom narrows as systemwide sales fall. A take-private bid that never arrives, or arrives at a price close to the pre-report level, would remove the support the shares got on August 12, while a bid that does arrive caps the upside at the deal price and ends the public thesis. Turnarounds in quick service typically take multiple years, and the company has changed leadership during this one, so execution risk is high and the payoff is not near-term.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell QSR or WEN; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    QSR vs WEN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App