RSG vs WMG: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
RSG is the larger of the two ($68.37B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (27.71x forward earnings, beta 0.40). WMG is the smaller challenger ($14.63B), cheaper on forward earnings (14.19x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
RSG vs WMG: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | RSG | WMG | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $68.37B | $14.63B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 27.71 | 14.19 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 31.63 | 22.38 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.40 | 1.29 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 69% of range | 38% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 5.68 | 17.13 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: WMG is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how RSG and WMG affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. RSG and WMG share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined RSG and WMG exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Republic Services (RSG) do?
Republic Services collects, transfers, recycles and buries waste. Collection produced 67.6% of revenue in the second quarter of 2026, split across small-container commercial (30.9%), large-container industrial (19.0%) and residential (17.3%). Post-collection disposal added a further 11.7% from landfills and 5.2% from transfer stations, both net of intercompany volume. Environmental Solutions, the Group 3 reportable segment that handles hazardous and non-hazardous industrial waste through 24 treatment, storage and disposal facilities, 16 deep injection wells and a field services business, contributed 10.3%. Recycling processing, commodity sales and other non-core lines made up the remaining ~5%. The physical network as of June 30, 2026 ran to 389 collection operations, 260 transfer stations, 84 recycling centers, two polymer centers and 208 active landfills holding an estimated 5.1 billion in-place cubic yards of available airspace, with an average remaining site life of 56 years. Republic also carries post-closure responsibility for 125 closed landfills and runs 87 landfill gas-to-energy and other renewable energy projects. Roughly 67% of collected solid waste is disposed at sites the company owns or operates, the internalization rate that turns a hauling route into a vertically integrated margin.
What does Warner Music Group Corp. (WMG) do?
Warner Music Group Corp. is one of the three major music companies, alongside Universal Music Group and Sony Music. It operates two segments. Recorded Music, roughly 80% of revenue, owns and markets sound recordings through labels including Atlantic Records, Warner Records, Elektra, Parlophone, Rhino, 300 Entertainment, Warner Music Nashville and the independent distributor ADA. Music Publishing, the remaining fifth, is Warner Chappell Music, which owns and administers the underlying compositions and collects mechanical, performance and synchronisation royalties. Those are genuinely different businesses attached to the same song: the recording is the specific performance you hear on Spotify, the composition is the melody and lyrics beneath it, and they are licensed, priced and collected separately. Publishing carries lower absolute revenue but very durable, annuity-like cash flows, which is why the segment's growth rate is watched as closely as the much larger recorded side.
RSG vs WMG: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- RSG drivers: Price above cost inflation is the entire engine; Volume is being given up on purpose.
- WMG drivers: Streaming price increases flowing through to royalties; Cost reduction lifting margin without new revenue.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Environmental Solutions is the visible soft spot. For WMG, warner sells through a handful of counterparties, so Spotify, Apple, Amazon, YouTube and Tencent Music hold real bargaining power over the rate and structure of every renewal, and a single unfavourable deal reprices a large share of digital revenue.
RSG or WMG: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick RSG if you believe its drivers more; WMG if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the RSG and WMG guides.
RSG vs WMG: the full fundamentals
RSG. Republic's low-30s trailing multiple sits close to Waste Management, at ~31.7 times on $25.67 billion of trailing revenue, and comfortably below Waste Connections at ~41 times on $9.76 billion. The sector as a whole carries an equity-like multiple on utility-like volatility, and buyers are underwriting decades of contracted price escalation rather than any growth in the amount of garbage Americans produce. One caution on the reported figures: GAAP pre-tax income now absorbs roughly $190 million a year of equity-method losses from renewable energy investments, which is offset in the tax provision rather than added back to adjusted EPS, so headline earnings growth understates operating performance while the effective tax rate flatters it.
WMG. Adding ~$4.09 billion of net debt to a ~$13.73 billion equity value gives an enterprise value near ~$17.8 billion, so Warner is capitalised roughly 2.5 times trailing revenue and in the low-to-mid teens on trailing EBITDA, a multiple that has compressed meaningfully from where the stock traded in late 2025. The June 2026 quarter produced net income of ~$200 million and basic EPS of ~$0.39 against a ~$0.03 per share loss a year earlier, with adjusted EPS of ~$0.51, while operating cash flow was ~$142 million and free cash flow ~$114 million. Management has recommitted to high-single-digit revenue growth, double-digit adjusted OIBDA and adjusted EPS growth, and 50% to 60% operating cash flow conversion, and the quarterly dividend of ~$0.20 per share works out to roughly a 3% yield at the current market capitalisation.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): RSG shows revenue (ttm) ~$16.89 billion for the twelve months to June 30, 2026, up ~3.2%, versus $16.591 billion in fiscal 2025, $16.032 billion in 2024 and $14.965 billion in 2023. Second-quarter revenue was $4.430 billion, up 4.6%, and first-half revenue $8.544 billion, up 3.6%. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance on August 6 to $17.200 billion to $17.300 billion., earnings and eps Net income attributable to Republic was $566 million in the second quarter, a 12.8% margin, or $1.84 per diluted share, against $550 million and $1.75 a year earlier. Adjusted EPS was $1.85 versus $1.77. TTM net income is ~$2.19 billion on ~$7.06 of diluted EPS. Full-year 2026 guidance is $7.18 to $7.23 reported and $7.23 to $7.28 adjusted, with adjusted EBITDA of $5.525 billion to $5.550 billion., pricing and volume Core price added 5.3% to second-quarter revenue (6.4% of related-business revenue, made up of 7.8% open market and 4.1% restricted), average yield 3.4%, fuel recovery fees 1.8%, acquisitions 1.1%, while volume subtracted 1.6%. By line: residential yield 4.4% on volume of negative 4.3%, small-container yield 5.0% on volume of negative 0.2%, large-container yield 3.8% on volume of negative 2.2%, and municipal solid waste landfill yield 5.6% on volume of positive 1.1%., segment mix and margin Recycling and Waste generated $3.972 billion of second-quarter revenue at a 33.5% adjusted EBITDA margin, up from 33.1%. Environmental Solutions generated $458 million at 20.2%, down from 24.4%, and $863 million at 19.7% for the half against $911 million at 22.6%. Group adjusted EBITDA margin was 32.1% in both periods. Recycled commodities averaged $136 per ton in the quarter, $13 below the prior year.; WMG shows revenue (ttm) ~$7.13B (FY2025 was ~$6.71B), fiscal q3 2026 revenue ~$1.864B (+10.4% YoY), segment split (q3 fy26) Recorded Music ~$1.488B, Publishing ~$377M, adjusted oibda (q3 fy26) ~$433M (+16.1%), ~23.2% margin.
The bottom line: RSG vs WMG
RSG and WMG are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined RSG and WMG exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how RSG or WMG fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Republic Services with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how RSG fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between RSG and WMG?
+
Republic Services collects, transfers, recycles and buries waste. Warner Music Group Corp. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is RSG or WMG the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. RSG is the larger incumbent; WMG is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, RSG or WMG?
+
On forward P/E (as of September 2026), RSG trades at 27.71x and WMG at 14.19x, so WMG is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both RSG and WMG?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of RSG vs WMG?
+
RSG: Environmental Solutions is the visible soft spot. First-half revenue in the segment fell to $863 million from $911 million and adjusted EBITDA to $171 million from $206 million, cutting the margin to 19.7% from 22.6%, which management attributes to a decline in event-based volumes. That business is ~10% of revenue and the most cyclical thing Republic owns, since emergency response, remediation and industrial field work depend on projects rather than routes. Recycled commodity pricing is a second swing factor: the average price per ton at Republic's recycling centers was $128 for the first half against $152 a year earlier, and the company estimates a $10 per ton move changes annual revenue and operating income by ~$13 million. Fuel cut the other way, at 3.9% of second-quarter revenue against 2.7%, with national average diesel at $5.35 per gallon versus $3.56, and while fuel recovery fees recouped most of it, they reprice on a lag. Leverage is real, if investment grade. Carrying value of total debt was $14.069 billion at June 30, 2026 against $13.581 billion at year end, interest expense guidance for 2026 is $605 million net, and June 2026 issuance priced at 4.750% for 2031 paper and 5.000% for 2036 paper, above the coupons on the maturities being refinanced. Accrued landfill and environmental costs totalled ~$2.8 billion, and remediation obligations at closed sites, including any future PFAS liability the industry has not yet sized, run off over decades rather than quarters. Republic itself names prolonged work stoppages among the factors that could change results. Finally, concentration: Cascade Investment's 35.5% stake removes a third of the shares from circulation, and any change to that position would be a large overhang for a stock with a 0.40 beta that many holders own as a bond substitute. WMG: Warner sells through a handful of counterparties, so Spotify, Apple, Amazon, YouTube and Tencent Music hold real bargaining power over the rate and structure of every renewal, and a single unfavourable deal reprices a large share of digital revenue. Subscriber growth in developed markets is maturing, which makes the growth story increasingly dependent on price increases and on emerging regions where average revenue per user is far lower. Generative AI cuts both ways: the licensing deals with Suno and Udio create a new revenue path, but an enormous volume of machine-generated tracks uploaded to streaming services can dilute the pro-rata royalty pool that Warner shares in. The balance sheet carries ~$4.71 billion of total debt against ~$618 million of cash, so the ~$4.09 billion net debt position amplifies any downturn in cash generation, and catalog acquisitions compete with debt reduction and the dividend for capital. Results are also hit-driven and lumpy, with a strong release slate or a viral artist able to swing a quarter, and a large share of revenue is earned in foreign currencies, so reported growth regularly diverges from constant-currency growth. Finally, artist and songwriter royalty rates have trended in the creators' favour through regulatory and negotiated changes, and advances have risen, both of which compress the label's economics on new signings.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell RSG or WMG; figures are approximate and dated (as of September 2026). Verify current data before investing.