STM vs WLY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
STM is the larger of the two ($46.73B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (20.55x forward earnings, beta 1.56). WLY is the smaller challenger ($2.74B), cheaper on forward earnings (10.17x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
STM vs WLY: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | STM | WLY | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $46.73B | $2.74B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 20.55 | 10.17 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 102.73 | 12.80 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.56 | 0.77 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 52% of range | 88% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.61 | 3.23 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: WLY is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how STM and WLY affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. STM and WLY share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined STM and WLY exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does STMicroelectronics (STM) do?
STMicroelectronics designs and manufactures a broad range of semiconductors, including analog chips, power and discrete devices (notably silicon carbide, where it holds the largest global share at roughly a third of the market), microcontrollers, MEMS sensors, and RF products. Its customers are concentrated in automotive (electrification, ADAS, body and safety electronics) and industrial (factory automation, power conversion, energy), with a more cyclical consumer and personal-electronics business layered on top. Unlike fabless designers, ST owns its fabs, which makes it capital-intensive and highly sensitive to factory utilization, a dynamic that has weighed heavily on margins during the recent downturn.
What does John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLY) do?
John Wiley & Sons is a scholarly publisher and research-intelligence company headquartered at 111 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, with roughly 4,500 employees worldwide and a corporate history running back to 1807. It reports in two segments. Research, at ~$1.13 billion of fiscal 2026 revenue, publishes peer-reviewed STM journals and sells content platforms, publishing services and audience solutions to universities, corporations, governments and academic societies; the Wiley Online Library and the Atypon platform business sit here. Learning, at ~$547 million, covers the Academic and Professional lines: scientific and professional books, digital courseware, the For Dummies imprint, and workplace assessment products such as Everything DiSC and The Five Behaviors. About 85% of revenue is digital and roughly 48% is recurring under subscriptions or contractually obligated agreements. The company also runs a dual-class structure that has been in place for decades, with Class B largely held by the Wiley family.
STM vs WLY: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- STM drivers: Silicon carbide and automotive electrification; Cyclical recovery off the trough.
- WLY drivers: Research publishing scale, now enlarged by Emerald; AI and data licensing as the second engine.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: STM is deeply cyclical and capital-intensive, so weak factory utilization can compress margins sharply, as it did in 2025 when operating margin fell near breakeven. For WLY, the clearest tension is that generative AI is both Wiley's newest customer and a credible substitute for parts of what it sells, particularly professional reference and courseware in Learning.
STM or WLY: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick STM if you believe its drivers more; WLY if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the STM and WLY guides.
STM vs WLY: the full fundamentals
STM. STM's valuation looks expensive on forward earnings largely because profits are depressed at the bottom of the cycle, not because the business is structurally rich. Revenue troughed near $3.1 billion in Q1 2026 with gross margin around 33.8%, well below the 44 to 46% level management targets in its longer-term model. The multiple therefore embeds an expectation that margins and earnings recover meaningfully over the next couple of years.
WLY. At ~$54, WLY trades near ~13x fiscal 2026 adjusted EPS and roughly ~11x the midpoint of the ~$4.60 to ~$5.05 fiscal 2027 guidance range, a discount to information-services peers that reflects flat revenue and the Learning drag. The stock has been volatile in a way the financials are not: the 52-week range runs from ~$28 to ~$57, so most of the move has come from how the market is choosing to value AI content licensing rather than from reported results. Wiley raised its dividend for a 32nd consecutive year in fiscal 2026 at ~$1.42 per share annualized, and it reports on an April fiscal year end, so the calendar is a quarter offset from most comparables.
Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): STM shows revenue (ttm) ~$12B, fy2025 revenue ~$11.8B (down ~11%), q1 2026 revenue ~$3.1B (up ~23% YoY), q1 2026 gross margin ~33.8%; WLY shows revenue (fy2026, ended april 2026) ~$1.68 billion, roughly flat year over year, research segment revenue ~$1.13 billion, up ~5%, adjusted ebitda ~$440 million, ~26.2% margin (record), adjusted eps ~$4.19 (GAAP diluted ~$4.16).
The bottom line: STM vs WLY
STM and WLY are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined STM and WLY exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how STM or WLY fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in STMicroelectronics with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how STM fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between STM and WLY?
+
STMicroelectronics designs and manufactures a broad range of semiconductors, including analog chips, power and discrete devices (notably silicon carbide, where it holds the largest global share at roughly a third of the market), microcontrollers, MEMS sensors, and RF products. John Wiley & Sons is a scholarly publisher and research-intelligence company headquartered at 111 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, with roughly 4,500 employees worldwide and a corporate history running back to 1807. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is STM or WLY the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. STM is the larger incumbent; WLY is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, STM or WLY?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), STM trades at 20.55x and WLY at 10.17x, so WLY is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both STM and WLY?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of STM vs WLY?
+
STM: STM is deeply cyclical and capital-intensive, so weak factory utilization can compress margins sharply, as it did in 2025 when operating margin fell near breakeven. Automotive and industrial demand can soften with macro conditions, EV adoption pace, and customer inventory swings, and the silicon carbide ramp faces pricing pressure and rising competition from Infineon, onsemi, and others. As a Europe-based manufacturer, ST is exposed to currency swings, tariffs, and geopolitical supply-chain risk. The shares also carry a premium forward multiple built on depressed earnings, so a slower-than-expected recovery could pressure the valuation. Finally, the French and Italian government-linked ownership stake adds a governance and strategic-priority dynamic not present in most peers. WLY: The clearest tension is that generative AI is both Wiley's newest customer and a credible substitute for parts of what it sells, particularly professional reference and courseware in Learning. AI licensing revenue is also lumpy and negotiated deal by deal, so a strong year can flatter comparisons that the next year has to lap, which is exactly what happened inside Learning in fiscal 2026. Emerald was funded with cash and a draw on the revolving credit facility, which pushes net debt above the ~$608 million reported at fiscal year end and puts integration risk on a company that has spent three years simplifying. Roughly half of revenue comes from outside the United States and Emerald generates ~85% of its revenue outside North America, so reported results carry real currency sensitivity, and open access economics continue to shift pricing power toward funders and institutions. Governance is a standing objection: ISS and Glass Lewis both recommended withholding votes from a Class A director nominee in 2025 over the dual-class structure and its lack of a sunset provision, and Class A holders elect only 30% of the board regardless of how many shares they own.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell STM or WLY; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.