What Is DFAS? Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

DFAS is Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF, an ETF that tracks Actively managed, no tracked index at a 0.26% expense ratio. DFAS carries a 1998 inception date, which is older than the ETF wrapper it now trades in and reflects a predecessor mutual fund rather than three decades of exchange-traded history. The portfolio itself is remarkable for how little any one name matters: the largest position, TTM Technologies, is 0.4%, and the top ten together reach only about 3.1% of assets. Dimensional runs it actively but by rule, screening a broad US small-cap universe on size, price and profitability. It holds $15.2B at 0.26%, yielding 0.96%.

Ticker
DFAS
Issuer
Dimensional Fund Advisors
Tracks
Actively managed, no tracked index
Expense ratio
0.26%
AUM
$15.2B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.96%
Inception
1998

DFAS is issued by Dimensional Fund Advisors and tracks Actively managed, no tracked index. It charges a 0.26% expense ratio, holds approximately $15.2B in assets under management, yields about 0.96%, and launched in 1998.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

Diversification taken to its logical end

A top holding of 0.4% is unusual even among small-cap funds. It means that a company doubling or halving in price changes the fund's value by a fraction of a percent. The ten largest positions, taken together, still come to only about 3.1%. Whatever happens to DFAS happens because a large group of small companies moved in the same direction, never because one of them did.

This is Dimensional's approach applied consistently. Rather than picking companies, the firm defines an eligible universe and then weights it with adjustments for relative price and profitability, screening out the most speculative and least profitable end of the small-cap market. The fund is legally active, since it follows no published index, but it behaves much more like a broad market sweep than like a stock-picking mandate.

One practical benefit of holding rather than tracking: the fund is not forced to trade on an index reconstitution date alongside every other fund following the same list. That flexibility on timing is a large part of why Dimensional runs its funds without a benchmark in the first place.

Small cap does not mean insulated from the chip cycle

The names at the top of the fund are a useful corrective to the idea that small-cap investing is a domestic, unglamorous corner of the market. TTM Technologies makes printed circuit boards. Amkor packages and tests semiconductors. Onto Innovation makes process control equipment for chip fabrication. Advanced Energy supplies power systems to semiconductor manufacturing tools. Sanmina is a contract electronics manufacturer.

Five of the ten largest positions sit somewhere in the semiconductor supply chain. Technology is 15% of the fund overall, behind financials at 20% and industrials at 19%, but the composition of that technology sleeve means the fund carries real exposure to global capital spending on chip manufacturing. That cycle is not correlated with the domestic US economy in the way people often assume small caps are.

The other sectors behave more conventionally. Financials at 20% in a US small-cap fund is mostly regional and community banks, which are sensitive to interest rates, deposit competition and regional property lending in ways that large money-centre banks are not. Healthcare at 13% brings a different profile again, since small healthcare companies range from profitable device makers to firms dependent on a single product approval.

Cost, income and where it does not belong

At 0.26%, DFAS is more expensive than the cheapest passive small-cap index funds and much cheaper than traditional active small-cap management. The premium over an index fund pays for the profitability and price screens and for the trading flexibility. Neither is guaranteed to produce anything, and both can look like drag for long stretches when speculative small caps lead the market, since those are precisely the companies the screens reduce.

The 0.96% yield is modest and incidental. Small companies reinvest more and distribute less, so anyone reaching for income will find both the level and the reliability lacking here.

The fund is a poor fit as a first equity holding, since small caps are a satellite rather than a core in most portfolios. It also overlaps considerably with any other broad US small-cap fund, so holding two adds fee lines without adding companies. Someone who specifically wants deep-value small caps or micro caps will find DFAS too broad, since it deliberately spans the whole small-cap range rather than concentrating on one corner of it.

DFAS holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of DFAS
1TTMITTM Technologies Inc0.4%
2AMKRAmkor Technology Inc0.3%
3ONTOOnto Innovation Inc0.3%
4JAZZJazz Pharmaceuticals PLC0.3%
5BWABorgWarner Inc0.3%
6AEISAdvanced Energy Industries Inc0.3%
7SANMSanmina Corp0.3%
8DOCNDigitalOcean Holdings Inc0.3%
9IESCIES Holdings Inc0.3%
10WCCWESCO International Inc0.3%

How do I invest in DFAS?

There are three common ways to get DFAS exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of DFAS directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so DFAS sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. DFAS trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is DFAS a good buy?

Whether DFAS is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks Actively managed, no tracked index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFAS a buy?

The bottom line on DFAS

DFAS gives you Actively managed, no tracked index exposure in one ticker at a 0.26% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on DFAS

Whether DFAS is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is DFAS a buy?

DFAS yields 0.96% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see DFAS dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like DFAS? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how DFAS fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in DFAS with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DFAS fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Why does DFAS show a 1998 inception date if it is an ETF?

+

The date reflects a predecessor mutual fund rather than the fund's life as an exchange-traded product. Dimensional converted several long-running mutual funds into ETFs, and the performance and inception history carries across the conversion. It is accurate as a record of the strategy but it does not mean the ticker traded on an exchange since 1998, which occasionally causes confusion when comparing fund ages.

Is DFAS actively managed?

+

Yes in the regulatory sense, since it tracks no published index, but the management is systematic. Dimensional defines an eligible small-cap universe and weights it using rules based on size, relative price and profitability. No manager selects individual companies by conviction. The main practical benefit of running without an index is trading flexibility, since the fund is not forced to buy and sell on fixed reconstitution dates.

How diversified is the fund?

+

Unusually so. The largest holding is 0.4% and the ten largest together reach roughly 3.1% of assets. Single-company risk is effectively negligible at that level. What drives returns is the behaviour of US small caps as a group, filtered through the profitability and price screens that shape the weights. Investors looking for concentrated small-cap exposure will not find it here.

What does the 20% financials weight consist of?

+

Predominantly regional and community banks, plus insurers and specialty lenders. This is normal for US small-cap indices and it carries a specific risk profile: sensitivity to the shape of the yield curve, deposit competition and concentrated regional lending exposures, particularly to commercial property. It behaves differently from the large diversified banks that dominate a large-cap financials weight.

How does DFAS differ from a standard small-cap index fund?

+

A standard index fund holds whatever the index defines, including the least profitable and most speculative companies at their full weight. DFAS reduces or excludes that end and tilts toward cheaper, more profitable companies. It also trades on its own schedule rather than on index reconstitution dates. The trade-off is a higher fee at 0.26% and periods when the excluded companies are the ones leading.

Is the 0.96% yield meaningful for income?

+

Not really. Smaller companies typically reinvest earnings rather than distribute them, so the payout is both low and variable. The figure is a byproduct of holding a broad basket of small companies, some of which pay dividends. An investor seeking income would look at dividend-focused or value-tilted large-cap funds, where both the level and the consistency of distributions are structurally higher.

Should DFAS be a core holding?

+

It is built as a satellite. US small caps are a slice of the equity market, not a substitute for broad exposure, and most allocations use a total-market or large-cap fund as the base with small caps added deliberately on top. Holding DFAS alongside another broad small-cap fund adds cost without adding companies, since the universes overlap almost completely.

What is DFAS's expense ratio?

+

DFAS has an expense ratio of 0.26% per year as of August 2026, charged by Dimensional Fund Advisors and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $26 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track Actively managed, no tracked index before you choose.

How do I compare DFAS to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. DFAS's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Dimensional Fund Advisors's fund page or your broker before investing.