What Is FDL? First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

FDL is First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund, an ETF that tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index at a 0.43% expense ratio. FDL selects US companies on dividend payments and weights them by the size of those payments rather than by market value. That single design choice produces the fund's two most striking features. Philip Morris International at 6.1% and Altria at 4.6% mean tobacco is 10.7% of the portfolio. And the ten largest holdings come to about 48%, which is unusually top-heavy for a fund filed under Large Value. It charges 0.43%, holds roughly $7.3 billion, yields 3.80%, and launched in 2006.

Ticker
FDL
Issuer
First Trust
Tracks
the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index
Expense ratio
0.43%
AUM
$7.3B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
3.80%
Inception
2006

FDL is issued by First Trust and tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. It charges a 0.43% expense ratio, holds approximately $7.3B in assets under management, yields about 3.80%, and launched in 2006.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

Dividend weighting concentrates by design

Most index funds weight by market capitalisation, so position size follows company size. FDL weights by the dollar value of dividends paid instead, which means a company distributing a great deal relative to its size takes a large position regardless of how large the company itself is. The weighting rule, not the selection rule, is what shapes the portfolio most.

The result is a distinctly top-heavy fund. Chevron at 7.4%, Verizon at 7.2%, Philip Morris at 6.1%, Pfizer at 5.9%, PepsiCo at 4.8% and Altria at 4.6% lead it, with the ten largest coming to about 48% in total. A cap-weighted large-value fund holding a similar number of companies would typically be far flatter across its top positions.

That concentration is the mechanism working correctly rather than failing. It does mean the fund's outcome depends heavily on a small group of companies and, more specifically, on whether those companies maintain their distributions. A cut at any of the top few would reduce both the income and the position weight at the next rebalance.

Why tobacco keeps appearing

Philip Morris and Altria together are 10.7% of a fund that most people would describe as conservative income. This is not a quirk of one particular snapshot or a lapse in the index methodology. It is what a dividend screen does when applied consistently.

Companies pay out a high share of earnings when they have limited opportunities to reinvest profitably, and their shares often carry a low valuation because investors expect little growth. Both conditions describe the tobacco industry closely. A screen that ranks on dividends paid will keep selecting for exactly that profile, in tobacco and in structurally similar mature industries such as telecoms and integrated energy.

Anyone operating an exclusion policy on tobacco should check this before buying any income fund, because the same logic runs through most high-yield screens regardless of provider. It is a structural consequence of the approach rather than a discretionary choice this particular index made, which means switching to a different high-yield fund often does not solve it.

What a dividend screen leaves out

Sector weights read consumer staples 24%, utilities 15%, financials 14%, healthcare 12% and communication services 11%. Technology does not appear among the top five sectors at all, which is a striking absence in a fund holding US large caps in 2026.

That absence is structural rather than temporary. Large technology companies retain earnings to reinvest, and several of the very largest pay no meaningful dividend, so a payment-weighted index cannot hold them at any size even if the screen were minded to. An investor whose only US equity exposure is FDL is deliberately excluding the largest segment of the American market by value.

The 0.43% fee is high for a rules-based index fund, several times what broad market exposure costs. Set against the 3.80% yield it consumes about eleven percent of the income the portfolio produces, which is a more useful way to read the number than the headline figure alone. Several broad dividend index funds charge a fraction of it, though they apply different screens.

FDL holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of FDL
1CVXChevron Corp7.4%
2VZVerizon Communications Inc7.2%
3PMPhilip Morris International Inc6.1%
4PFEPfizer Inc5.9%
5PEPPepsiCo Inc4.8%
6MOAltria Group Inc4.6%
7BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co3.4%
8UPSUnited Parcel Service Inc Class B3.2%
9CMCSAComcast Corp Class A3.1%
10SOSouthern Co2.3%

How do I invest in FDL?

There are three common ways to get FDL exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of FDL directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so FDL sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. FDL trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is FDL a good buy?

Whether FDL is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FDL a buy?

The bottom line on FDL

FDL gives you the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.43% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on FDL

Whether FDL is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FDL a buy?

FDL yields 3.80% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see FDL dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like FDL? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how FDL fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in FDL with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how FDL fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is FDL?

+

FDL is the First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund. It tracks the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index, selecting US companies on dividend payments and weighting them by the size of those payments rather than by market value. It charges 0.43%, holds about $7.3 billion, yields roughly 3.80%, and launched in 2006. Morningstar files it under Large Value.

How concentrated is FDL?

+

Considerably more than most large-value funds. The ten largest holdings are about 48% of the fund, led by Chevron at 7.4% and Verizon at 7.2%. That is a direct consequence of dividend weighting, which sizes positions by the dollars a company distributes rather than by its market value. A cap-weighted value fund with similar holdings would be far flatter across its top positions.

Why is there so much tobacco in FDL?

+

Philip Morris at 6.1% and Altria at 4.6% together account for 10.7% of the fund. Companies distribute a high share of earnings when they have limited reinvestment opportunities, and their shares often carry low valuations because investors expect little growth. Tobacco fits that profile closely, so any dividend-weighted screen will tend to select it. This is structural to the approach rather than specific to this index.

Does FDL hold technology companies?

+

Not in any meaningful size. Technology does not appear among the top five sectors, which run consumer staples 24%, utilities 15%, financials 14%, healthcare 12% and communication services 11%. Large technology companies retain earnings rather than distributing them, and several of the largest pay no meaningful dividend, so a payment-weighted index structurally cannot hold them at significant weight.

Is a 3.80% yield high?

+

It is high for a US equity fund, where broad market exposure typically pays well under two percent and mega-cap funds pay under one. The yield comes from selecting companies on distributions and then weighting by them, which doubles down on the effect. The trade is that the same screen excludes most growth companies, so the income arrives at the cost of a much narrower slice of the market.

Is 0.43% expensive for a dividend ETF?

+

It is high for a rules-based index fund that follows a published methodology. Set against the 3.80% yield it takes about eleven percent of the income the portfolio produces, which is the more meaningful comparison for an income holding. Several broad dividend index funds charge a fraction of this, though they use different screens and end up holding a different set of companies.

How does FDL differ from a dividend growth fund?

+

Substantially, in both method and result. A dividend growth screen selects companies that have raised distributions consistently, which favours moderate payers with room to keep increasing. A high-dividend screen like this one selects companies paying the most right now. The two approaches routinely produce portfolios with very little overlap, and the growth version almost always yields less today.

What is the risk in a high-yield screen?

+

That a high yield sometimes signals a market expectation of trouble rather than a generous board. A company whose share price has fallen shows a higher yield mechanically, without any decision having been made. If the distribution is subsequently cut, the holder loses both the income and the price. Dividend-weighted funds carry more exposure to that pattern than cap-weighted ones do.

What is FDL's expense ratio?

+

FDL has an expense ratio of 0.43% per year as of August 2026, charged by First Trust and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $43 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index before you choose.

How do I compare FDL to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. FDL's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against First Trust's fund page or your broker before investing.