What Is FVD? First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
FVD is First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund, an ETF that tracks the Value Line Dividend Index at a 0.62% expense ratio. FVD selects dividend-paying US companies that carry a high Value Line Safety Rank, then weights them equally rather than by size. The equal weighting is visible in the data: the ten largest holdings all sit at 0.4%, from Reynolds Consumer Products to Johnson and Johnson. The result leans defensive, with financials at 20%, utilities at 17%, industrials at 14%, consumer staples at 11% and real estate at 8%. It has run since 2003 and holds $8.0B. The 0.62% expense ratio is high relative to the 2.32% trailing yield the fund produces.
FVD is issued by First Trust and tracks the Value Line Dividend Index. It charges a 0.62% expense ratio, holds approximately $8.0B in assets under management, yields about 2.32%, and launched in 2003.
The fee against the income
Set the two headline numbers side by side. The fund charges 0.62% a year and distributes 2.32%. The fee is therefore equivalent to roughly a quarter of the income the fund hands over. For an investor whose reason for holding a dividend fund is the dividend, that is a large share of the product going to the manager before anything reaches them. Broad dividend index funds are available for a small fraction of this cost, which is the comparison that matters.
The defence of the fee is that this is not a mechanical high-yield screen. The selection uses Value Line's Safety Rank, a proprietary measure combining price stability and balance sheet strength, and requires companies to yield more than the broad market. That is a quality overlay rather than a yield grab, and applying it costs something. Whether it costs 0.62% a year is the question, and it is one that compounds: a fee gap of half a percent applied over twenty years removes a meaningful share of terminal value.
The 2.32% yield is also worth reading carefully. It is above what a broad US market fund pays and well below what a high-yield screen produces. The Safety Rank filter systematically excludes the highest-yielding companies, because a very high yield usually signals a share price that has fallen for a reason. That trade is deliberate and it is the fund's central design decision.
Equal weighting changes what you own
Every one of the ten largest holdings sits at 0.4%: Reynolds Consumer Products, RLI, Sonoco Products, Jack Henry, IBM, Merck, Brown and Brown, Labcorp, Comcast and Johnson and Johnson. Placing IBM and Johnson and Johnson at the same weight as a packaging company and a specialty insurer is not something a market-capitalisation index would ever do. The ten together are about 4% of the fund.
Equal weighting has two consequences. It pushes the average holding down the size scale, which is why the fund is categorised as mid-cap value despite containing plenty of large companies. And it requires periodic rebalancing, selling what has risen and buying what has lagged, which mechanically leans the portfolio toward cheaper stocks over time and generates turnover that a cap-weighted fund avoids.
The sector mix follows from the screen rather than from any sector target. Financials at 20% reflects the number of banks and insurers that pay steady dividends and score well on stability. Utilities at 17% and real estate at 8% are unusually heavy weights, and they carry a specific consequence: both are sensitive to interest rates, so the fund tends to behave partly like a bond proxy in periods when rates move sharply.
What it is good at and what it is not
The portfolio is built to be dull in a useful way. Stable, established companies with long dividend records and strong balance sheets, spread evenly, with almost no exposure to the megacap technology names that dominate US index returns. In periods when the market is led by a handful of very large growth companies, this fund will lag badly, and that is a structural feature rather than a failure of execution.
It also carries rate sensitivity that buyers do not always anticipate. A quarter of the fund sits in utilities and real estate, both of which compete with bonds for income-seeking capital and both of which are financed with substantial debt. When yields rise sharply, these sectors typically fall regardless of how their businesses are performing.
For anyone comparing dividend funds, the questions to ask are what the screen selects for, how the holdings are weighted, and what the fee is as a share of the income. FVD answers those with a quality-and-stability screen, equal weighting, and a fee that is high for the category. Cheaper alternatives use different screens and produce different portfolios, so the comparison is not purely about cost.
FVD holdings: top 10
Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.
| Rank | Ticker | Company | % of FVD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | REYN | Reynolds Consumer Products Inc Ordinary Shares | 0.4% | |
| 2 | RLI | RLI Corp | 0.4% | |
| 3 | SON | Sonoco Products Co | 0.4% | |
| 4 | JKHY | Jack Henry & Associates Inc | 0.4% | |
| 5 | IBM | International Business Machines Corp | 0.4% | |
| 6 | MRK | Merck & Co Inc | 0.4% | |
| 7 | BRO | Brown & Brown Inc | 0.4% | |
| 8 | LH | Labcorp Holdings Inc | 0.4% | |
| 9 | CMCSA | Comcast Corp Class A | 0.4% | |
| 10 | JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 0.4% |
How do I invest in FVD?
There are three common ways to get FVD exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of FVD directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so FVD sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. FVD trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.
New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.
Is FVD a good buy?
Whether FVD is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks the Value Line Dividend Index, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FVD a buy?
The bottom line on FVD
FVD gives you the Value Line Dividend Index exposure in one ticker at a 0.62% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.
More on FVD
Whether FVD is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is FVD a buy?
FVD yields 2.32% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see FVD dividend: yield and schedule.
New to funds like FVD? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.
Wondering how FVD fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in FVD with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how FVD fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
How does FVD choose its holdings?
+
It follows the Value Line Dividend Index, which starts from companies awarded a high Value Line Safety Rank, a proprietary measure of price stability and financial strength, and then keeps those whose dividend yield exceeds the broad market average. The result is a quality-filtered dividend portfolio rather than a pure yield screen, which is why the 2.32% yield is moderate rather than high.
Why is every top holding weighted at 0.4%?
+
Because the fund weights its constituents equally rather than by market capitalisation. IBM, Merck and Johnson and Johnson sit at the same weight as Reynolds Consumer Products, RLI and Sonoco. This spreads risk evenly across holdings, pushes the average company size down, and requires regular rebalancing that sells winners and buys laggards, which creates turnover a cap-weighted fund does not have.
Is the 0.62% expense ratio justified?
+
It is high for a rules-based dividend fund, and it is equivalent to roughly a quarter of the fund's 2.32% distribution. Broad dividend index funds charge a small fraction of it. The counterargument is that the Safety Rank screen produces a genuinely different portfolio from a simple yield sort. That difference has to be worth more than the fee gap for the arithmetic to work.
Why is FVD classed as mid-cap value?
+
Equal weighting is the reason. When every holding carries the same weight, the fund's average market capitalisation falls well below that of a cap-weighted portfolio of the same companies, even though it holds large names like Merck, IBM and Johnson and Johnson. The regular rebalancing back to equal weight also gives it a persistent tilt toward cheaper stocks.
Why are utilities such a large part of the fund?
+
Utilities are 17% of the portfolio because they pay reliable dividends and score well on stability screens, which is exactly what this methodology selects for. Combined with 8% in real estate, that puts a quarter of the fund in rate-sensitive, debt-financed sectors. Those holdings tend to fall when bond yields rise sharply, independent of how the underlying businesses are trading.
Does FVD hold technology companies?
+
Very little. Technology does not appear among the five largest sectors, and the only technology-adjacent names in the top ten are IBM and Jack Henry, each at 0.4%. Most large technology companies either pay no dividend or pay too little to clear the yield requirement. This is the main reason the fund lags in markets led by megacap growth stocks.
What is the fund's biggest weakness?
+
Cost relative to the income it produces, and its structural absence from the part of the market that has driven index returns. Neither is a defect in execution; both follow directly from the design. An investor should be comfortable with long stretches of underperformance against the S&P 500 during growth-led markets, and should compare the fee against cheaper dividend funds explicitly.
How long has FVD been running?
+
Since 2003, which makes it one of the longer-established dividend ETFs and means it has operated through several full market cycles. It holds $8.0B. A long record is useful for understanding how the methodology behaves in different environments, though it says nothing about future results and does not offset the ongoing fee difference against newer, cheaper competitors.
How do I compare FVD to similar ETFs?
+
Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. FVD's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.
Related ETFs
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against First Trust's fund page or your broker before investing.