AAPL vs DIS: How Apple Inc. and Walt Disney Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: DIS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AAPL and DIS share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AAPL and DIS exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Apple (AAPL) designs and sells consumer hardware, software, and services. The iPhone is its largest product by revenue, complemented by Mac computers, iPad tablets, and the wearables category (Apple Watch, AirPods). The fastest-growing and highest-margin part of the business is Services: the App Store, iCloud, Apple Music, Apple TV+, AppleCare, advertising, and payments. Apple's strategy centers on a tightly integrated ecosystem where hardware, the operating systems (iOS, macOS, watchOS), and services reinforce each other and create high switching costs. The company designs its own silicon (the A-series and M-series chips) and outsources manufacturing primarily to partners like TSMC and Foxconn. Founded in 1976 and headquartered in Cupertino, California, Apple is one of the most valuable companies in the world and returns enormous cash to shareholders through buybacks and a growing dividend.

Full AAPL guide

Disney runs three reporting segments. Entertainment covers the Disney+ and Hulu streaming services, film studios (Walt Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm, 20th Century), and the legacy linear TV networks; it makes money from subscription fees, advertising, box office, and licensing, and in fiscal-Q2 2026 generated revenue of ~$11.7 billion and operating income of ~$1.34 billion. Sports is primarily ESPN, monetized through affiliate fees, advertising, and now a direct-to-consumer subscription; it earned ~$652 million of operating income on ~$4.6 billion of revenue that quarter, with profit pressured by rights costs. Experiences (domestic and international theme parks, resorts, cruise ships, and consumer products) is the profit center, posting record fiscal-Q2 operating income of ~$2.6 billion on ~$9.5 billion of revenue, earning money from ticket sales, hotels, food, merchandise, cruises, and brand licensing.

Full DIS guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• AAPL drivers: Services growth and margin; Installed base and switching costs.
• DIS drivers: Experiences as the cash engine; Streaming profit inflection.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: iPhone is still the majority of revenue, so any slowdown in smartphone replacement cycles or weakness in China, a large and competitive market, hits results directly. For DIS, the legacy linear-TV business (cable networks and traditional distribution) is in secular decline as audiences cut the cord, and the high-margin affiliate fees that decline carries are difficult to fully replace with streaming subscriptions.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick AAPL if you believe its drivers more; DIS if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the AAPL and DIS guides.

AAPL. Apple trades at a premium multiple for a hardware-rooted business, justified by its Services growth, enormous and consistent free cash flow, and aggressive buybacks that steadily shrink the share count. The valuation embeds confidence in installed-base durability; multiple compression risk rises if iPhone growth stalls or Services regulation bites.

DIS. Disney trades at a price-to-earnings multiple in the mid-teens, well below its own historical average, reflecting both the parks-driven earnings base and lingering skepticism about media. The 2026 dividend of ~$1.50 per share marks roughly a 50% increase over the ~$1.00 paid in 2025, continuing the recovery from the dividend's pandemic-era suspension. Figures are tied to the asOf date and reflect fiscal 2025 full-year and fiscal-Q2 2026 (ended March 28, 2026) reporting.

Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): AAPL shows revenue (ttm) ~$400 billion, operating margin ~30%, net income (ttm) ~$100 billion, gross margin ~46% (Services much higher than hardware); DIS shows revenue (fy2025, ended sept 2025) ~$94.4 billion, total segment operating income (fy2025) ~$17.6 billion, experiences operating income (fiscal-q2 2026) ~$2.6 billion (record), streaming (disney+/hulu) operating income (fiscal-q2 2026) ~$582 million, up ~88% YoY.

AAPL and DIS are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AAPL and DIS exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.