ABT vs CVS: How Abbott Laboratories and CVS Health Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: CVS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ABT and CVS share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ABT and CVS exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Abbott Laboratories is a global healthcare company headquartered in North Chicago, Illinois, that discovers, develops, manufactures, and sells health care products in more than 160 countries through four segments: Medical Devices, Diagnostic Products, Nutritional Products, and Established Pharmaceutical Products. Medical Devices, the largest segment at roughly $21.4 billion in 2025 revenue, includes the FreeStyle Libre family of continuous glucose monitors, structural heart products (Navitor, TriClip), electrophysiology systems (AVEIR leadless pacemaker), vascular devices, and heart-failure technologies. Diagnostics contributes roughly $8.9 billion, Nutrition roughly $8.5 billion (anchored by Similac infant formula and Ensure adult nutrition), and Established Pharmaceuticals roughly $5.5 billion in branded generics sold primarily in emerging markets.

Full ABT guide

CVS Health runs three reporting segments. Health Care Benefits is the Aetna insurance business, which earns premiums from roughly 26 million medical members and profits when claims (the medical benefit ratio) stay below what it collects. Health Services is built around the Caremark pharmacy benefit manager, which negotiates drug prices and manages pharmacy claims for health plans and employers and generated over $48 billion of revenue in Q1 2026. Pharmacy and Consumer Wellness is the familiar retail footprint of CVS drugstores, which makes money filling prescriptions and selling front-of-store health and consumer goods, with same-store prescription volumes up nearly 7% in Q1 2026.

Full CVS guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• ABT drivers: FreeStyle Libre: A Platform, Not Just a Product; Cardiovascular and Electrophysiology Momentum.
• CVS drivers: Integrated model under one roof; Turnaround and improving Aetna margins.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most acute near-term risk is infant formula litigation: juries have delivered verdicts including a $53 million compensatory award in late March 2026 and a separately upheld $495 million verdict, with hundreds of additional NEC-related cases still pending, and a securities class action filed in 2026 adds a parallel legal exposure track targeting alleged investor misstatements. For CVS, the clearest risk is the medical-cost trend at Aetna: if claims reaccelerate, especially in Medicare Advantage, earnings can fall faster than premiums can be re-priced, which is what drove the 2023 to 2024 decline.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick ABT if you believe its drivers more; CVS if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ABT and CVS guides.

ABT. ABT's trailing GAAP P/E of roughly 26x sits below its own 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year historical averages, and is modestly above the Medical Devices and Instruments industry median of roughly 25x, suggesting the market has re-rated the stock from COVID-era growth-premium levels while still assigning a quality multiple. Revenue growth has remained consistently positive in the 5-7% range even as GAAP EPS was pressured in FY2025 by a year-over-year comparison that included elevated one-time items. The FY2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $5.38-$5.58 implies a forward adjusted P/E in the high-teens to low-twenties range at recent share prices, which analysts broadly describe as modestly discounted relative to fundamental fair value estimates.

CVS. CVS trades at a low forward earnings multiple versus the broad market, which reflects lingering caution after the 2023 to 2024 Aetna downturn rather than current results. The value angle rests on whether improving margins and ~$400 billion of revenue can support the raised guidance. Figures are approximate and tied to the asOf date; verify live quotes and the latest filings before acting.

Headline figures (approximate, 2026-06-27 (TTM through Q1 2026; share price data as of June 26, 2026)): ABT shows revenue (ttm) ~$45.1 billion, revenue (fy 2025) ~$44.3 billion (+5.7% YoY), net income (fy 2025) ~$6.5 billion, net profit margin (fy 2025) ~14.7%; CVS shows revenue (annual run-rate) ~$400 billion; FY2026 guidance at least ~$405 billion, adjusted eps (fy2026 guidance) ~$7.30 to $7.50 (Q1 2026 was ~$2.57), aetna medical benefit ratio (q1 2026) ~84.6%, improved from ~87.3% a year earlier, dividend yield ~2.5% (~$2.66 annual, ~$0.665 quarterly).

ABT and CVS are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ABT and CVS exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.