AER vs EQPT: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
AER is the larger of the two ($22.66B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (7.92x forward earnings, beta 0.93). EQPT is the smaller challenger ($4.27B), actually pricier on forward earnings (18.49x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
AER vs EQPT: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | AER | EQPT | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $22.66B | $4.27B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 7.92 | 18.49 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 7.08 | 168.50 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 63% of range | 6% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 1.21 | 3.52 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: AER is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how AER and EQPT affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AER and EQPT share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AER and EQPT exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does AerCap Holdings (AER) do?
AerCap Holdings N.V. is the largest aircraft leasing company in the world, owning and managing a fleet of commercial aircraft, engines, and helicopters that it leases to hundreds of airline customers across the globe. The company generates revenue primarily from lease payments, and it also books gains by selling aircraft into a tight secondary market. AerCap operates a scale-driven business: it orders new jets from Boeing and Airbus at volume, finances them with large amounts of debt, and earns a spread between lease income and its cost of capital. It became the clear industry leader after acquiring GE Capital Aviation Services (GECAS) in 2021.
What does EquipmentShare.com (EQPT) do?
EquipmentShare.com Inc (Nasdaq: EQPT) is a construction technology and equipment rental company founded in 2015 and headquartered in Columbia, Missouri. It rents and sells earthmoving, aerial, power, and general construction equipment through a rapidly expanding network of full-service rental branches, and it layers on a proprietary T3 platform that provides telematics, fleet tracking, utilization data, and service scheduling. The company positions itself as a tech-enabled disrupter of a rental industry long dominated by United Rentals and Ashtead's Sunbelt Rentals, and it grew to roughly 385 locations by the end of 2025.
AER vs EQPT: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- AER drivers: Tight aircraft supply and rising lease rates; Scale and market leadership.
- EQPT drivers: Branch and fleet expansion; T3 technology platform.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: AerCap carries a very large debt load, with total debt-to-equity well above 200%, so higher interest rates raise financing costs and can compress spreads. For EQPT, the business is highly capital-intensive and carries substantial debt, including large senior notes, so rising rates or a construction downturn could pressure both earnings and the balance sheet.
AER or EQPT: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick AER if you believe its drivers more; EQPT if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the AER and EQPT guides.
AER vs EQPT: the full fundamentals
AER. As of July 2026 AerCap traded around $147 per share with a low trailing P/E near 6.5x against record recent earnings. The modest multiple reflects the market's discount for heavy leverage and aviation cyclicality rather than weak current results. Enterprise value is far larger than market cap, roughly $65 billion, because the balance sheet carries substantial aircraft-backed debt.
EQPT. EquipmentShare trades around the high teens per share in mid-2026, well below its roughly $34 peak just after the January 2026 IPO, giving it a market cap in the $4.5 to $5.6 billion range depending on the day. The company earns a large adjusted EBITDA but very thin net income because of heavy depreciation and interest from its capital-intensive fleet, so valuation leans on EBITDA and growth rather than earnings multiples. Guidance calls for 2026 revenue of roughly $5.0 to $5.5 billion, so the market is pricing continued rapid expansion against real leverage and cyclicality.
Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): AER shows revenue (ttm) ~$8.7B, net income (fy2025) ~$3.8B, diluted eps (ttm) ~$22, market cap ~$23.5B; EQPT shows revenue (ttm) ~$4.7B, fy2025 revenue ~$4.4B, adjusted core ebitda (2025) ~$1.67B, net income (ttm) ~$58M.
The bottom line: AER vs EQPT
AER and EQPT are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AER and EQPT exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how AER or EQPT fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in AerCap Holdings with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how AER fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between AER and EQPT?
+
AerCap Holdings N.V. EquipmentShare.com Inc (Nasdaq: EQPT) is a construction technology and equipment rental company founded in 2015 and headquartered in Columbia, Missouri. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is AER or EQPT the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. AER is the larger incumbent; EQPT is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, AER or EQPT?
+
On forward P/E (as of September 2026), AER trades at 7.92x and EQPT at 18.49x, so AER is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both AER and EQPT?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of AER vs EQPT?
+
AER: AerCap carries a very large debt load, with total debt-to-equity well above 200%, so higher interest rates raise financing costs and can compress spreads. Airline bankruptcies, defaults, or geopolitical shocks can leave aircraft idle or force repossessions, and the company took large writedowns tied to jets stranded in Russia. Aircraft values are cyclical and can fall sharply in a downturn, hitting residual values and gains on sale. The business is capital-intensive and exposed to Boeing and Airbus delivery delays. A recession that curbs air travel would pressure lease demand, rates, and utilization at the same time. EQPT: The business is highly capital-intensive and carries substantial debt, including large senior notes, so rising rates or a construction downturn could pressure both earnings and the balance sheet. Revenue is cyclical and tied to nonresidential construction, and net income has been thin and volatile relative to the size of the fleet. A short-seller report (Umibozu Research) has alleged self-dealing, related-party transactions, and an overstated technology narrative, which adds governance and disclosure risk. As a recently public, founder-controlled company with a dual-class structure, minority holders have limited voting power. Competition from far larger, better-capitalized rivals like United Rentals and Sunbelt could cap pricing and returns.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell AER or EQPT; figures are approximate and dated (as of September 2026). Verify current data before investing.