ALKT vs FIS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

FIS is the larger of the two ($21.06B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (6.09x forward earnings, beta 0.81). ALKT is the smaller challenger ($2.19B), actually pricier on forward earnings (18.87x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

ALKT vs FIS: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricALKTFISWhat it tells you
Market cap$2.19B$21.06BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E18.876.09Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Beta0.610.81Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range51% of range10% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book6.051.31How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: FIS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how ALKT and FIS affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ALKT and FIS share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ALKT and FIS exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Alkami Technology (ALKT) do?

Alkami Technology, Inc. sells software to the part of American banking that cannot build its own. Founded in 2009 and public since April 2021, it licenses what it now calls the Digital Sales and Service Platform: a cloud-native, multi-tenant digital banking platform for retail and business account holders, an onboarding and account-opening suite acquired with Fin Technologies, Inc. (dba MANTL) in March 2025 for about $375.5 million net of cash, and a data and marketing layer built on the 2022 Segmint acquisition, plus the ACH Alert fraud products. Contracts are multi-year subscriptions priced largely per registered user against a monthly contractual minimum, which is why management reports annual recurring revenue and revenue per registered user alongside GAAP revenue. As of June 30, 2026 the platform served 313 financial institutions and more than 1,000 clients counting those buying only one acquired product, covering 23.6 million registered users at an RPU of $21.69. The target market is the roughly 2,500 largest US institutions outside the megabanks, holding between $100 million and $450 billion in assets, and almost every platform win is a displacement of an incumbent core processor rather than a greenfield sale. Headcount was 1,225 at the end of 2025, with a growing engineering presence in India.

Full ALKT guide

What does Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) do?

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is a global financial-technology company that provides the software and services banks, capital-markets firms, and merchants run on. It operates mainly through two segments, Banking Solutions (core processing, digital banking, payments, and related software for financial institutions) and Capital Market Solutions (trading, treasury, lending, and risk technology for buy-side and sell-side firms). FIS serves more than 20,000 clients across over 130 countries and processes trillions of dollars in transactions each year, which makes it more of an embedded infrastructure vendor than a consumer-facing brand. Because its software is woven into clients' daily operations, revenue is heavily recurring and switching costs are high.

Full FIS guide

ALKT vs FIS: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • ALKT drivers: An open sale process with no announced buyer; ARR is compounding faster than reported revenue.
  • FIS drivers: Sticky, recurring banking software; Capital Markets momentum.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most immediate risk is the one driving the recent price: if the sale process ends without a transaction, the deal premium embedded in a stock up ~25 percent in three months has nothing holding it up, and the company returns to being valued on growth that has decelerated from 32.9 percent in fiscal 2025 (flattered by MANTL) to a guided ~19 percent this year. For FIS, the main risk is that FIS is a mature, slower-growing business competing against strong rivals, so growth can disappoint if bank IT spending softens or clients delay projects.

ALKT or FIS: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick ALKT if you believe its drivers more; FIS if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ALKT and FIS guides.

ALKT vs FIS: the full fundamentals

ALKT. With no GAAP earnings, the usable multiples are revenue-based. At ~$2.19 billion of equity value the stock trades near ~4.5x trailing sales and, adding $345 million of convertible notes and netting ~$81 million of cash and marketable securities, close to ~5.0x enterprise value to trailing revenue or ~4.8x ARR. On the guided adjusted EBITDA midpoint of ~$97 million that is roughly 25x enterprise value to EBITDA, which is the number a private equity buyer would be working from, and it is a materially less forgiving figure than the sales multiple implies.

FIS. Figures are approximate and tied to the asOf date; verify live numbers before acting. The January 2026 close of the Issuer Solutions acquisition and Worldpay sale makes reported and pro forma growth figures diverge sharply, so read guidance carefully and check which basis a number uses. FIS trades as a mature, cash-generative software and payments company, so investors tend to weigh recurring-revenue durability, margin expansion, and deleveraging progress more than headline growth.

Headline figures (approximate, September 2026): ALKT shows revenue (ttm) ~$489.7 million, against ~$443.6 million in fiscal 2025, annual recurring revenue ~$511.7 million at June 30, 2026, up ~20.7% year over year, q2 2026 revenue and adjusted ebitda ~$129.8 million (+15.9%) and ~$19.4 million (14.9% margin), fy2026 guidance revenue ~$528 million to ~$531 million, adjusted EBITDA ~$96 million to ~$98 million; FIS shows revenue (ttm) ~$10 to 11 billion (2025 revenue was roughly $10.7 billion; segment mix shifts after the January 2026 Issuer Solutions and Worldpay transactions), 2026 revenue growth guidance ~mid-single-digit pro forma (roughly 5% to 6%), with much larger reported/adjusted growth reflecting the Issuer Solutions consolidation, adjusted ebitda margin ~high-30s percent, with guidance for continued margin expansion, market cap ~$20 billion (stock in the roughly $40 range in mid-2026).

The bottom line: ALKT vs FIS

ALKT and FIS are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ALKT and FIS exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how ALKT or FIS fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Alkami Technology with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how ALKT fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between ALKT and FIS?

+

Alkami Technology, Inc. Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is ALKT or FIS the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. FIS is the larger incumbent; ALKT is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, ALKT or FIS?

+

On forward P/E (as of September 2026), ALKT trades at 18.87x and FIS at 6.09x, so FIS is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both ALKT and FIS?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of ALKT vs FIS?

+

ALKT: The most immediate risk is the one driving the recent price: if the sale process ends without a transaction, the deal premium embedded in a stock up ~25 percent in three months has nothing holding it up, and the company returns to being valued on growth that has decelerated from 32.9 percent in fiscal 2025 (flattered by MANTL) to a guided ~19 percent this year. Profitability is still a GAAP question rather than an adjusted one, with ~$18.9 million of first-half net loss and ~$34.8 million of stock-based compensation, meaning dilution is a real cost that the EBITDA framing sets aside; the 2030 converts add another ~10.5 million potential shares at a $32.82 conversion price. Competitive position depends on continuing to take accounts from core processors that can bundle digital banking into an existing contract and cut price on it, and a single large client loss or a wave of credit union consolidation shows up directly in ARR. Gross margin has compressed for two consecutive comparisons on third-party and hosting costs, which is the wrong direction for a software business claiming scale benefits. Finally, bank and credit union technology budgets are cyclical and slow to approve, and the balance sheet carries ~$81 million of cash and marketable securities against $345 million of convertible debt, so financial flexibility is adequate rather than comfortable. FIS: The main risk is that FIS is a mature, slower-growing business competing against strong rivals, so growth can disappoint if bank IT spending softens or clients delay projects. Its long history of acquisitions and divestitures, including the costly Worldpay round trip, is a reminder that large deals do not always create shareholder value, and the Issuer Solutions integration carries execution and financing risk. The 2026 transactions were partly debt-funded, so leverage is elevated until FIS deleverages as planned, which pressures the balance sheet if cash flow lags. Competition from Fiserv, Global Payments, ACI Worldwide, Temenos, Oracle, and newer cloud-native core-banking vendors is intense, and technology shifts toward modern, cloud-first platforms could erode the switching-cost moat over time. The stock has also been volatile, having fallen sharply over the past year on growth and guidance concerns.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell ALKT or FIS; figures are approximate and dated (as of September 2026). Verify current data before investing.