AMZN vs DIS: How Amazon and Walt Disney Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: DIS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AMZN and DIS share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AMZN and DIS exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Amazon is one of the largest companies in the world, operating across three major business lines. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the dominant global cloud computing provider, generating around $110 billion in annual revenue and most of the company's operating income. The North America and International e-commerce segments include the Amazon online marketplace, Prime membership, and third-party seller services. Advertising has grown into the third-largest digital ad business in the world (after Google and Meta).

Full AMZN guide

Disney runs three reporting segments. Entertainment covers the Disney+ and Hulu streaming services, film studios (Walt Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Lucasfilm, 20th Century), and the legacy linear TV networks; it makes money from subscription fees, advertising, box office, and licensing, and in fiscal-Q2 2026 generated revenue of ~$11.7 billion and operating income of ~$1.34 billion. Sports is primarily ESPN, monetized through affiliate fees, advertising, and now a direct-to-consumer subscription; it earned ~$652 million of operating income on ~$4.6 billion of revenue that quarter, with profit pressured by rights costs. Experiences (domestic and international theme parks, resorts, cruise ships, and consumer products) is the profit center, posting record fiscal-Q2 operating income of ~$2.6 billion on ~$9.5 billion of revenue, earning money from ticket sales, hotels, food, merchandise, cruises, and brand licensing.

Full DIS guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• AMZN drivers: AWS as the AI infrastructure backbone; Retail margin expansion.
• DIS drivers: Experiences as the cash engine; Streaming profit inflection.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Hyperscaler AI capex is concentrated; if model training demand cools, AWS growth slows. For DIS, the legacy linear-TV business (cable networks and traditional distribution) is in secular decline as audiences cut the cord, and the high-margin affiliate fees that decline carries are difficult to fully replace with streaming subscriptions.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick AMZN if you believe its drivers more; DIS if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the AMZN and DIS guides.

AMZN. Amazon's headline P/E reflects the aggregate of low-margin retail and high-margin AWS/advertising. The valuation premium is paid for AWS specifically; retail is essentially valued near cost. P/E of 40x is elevated versus the S&P 500 average (~22x), supported by AWS growth re-accelerating.

DIS. Disney trades at a price-to-earnings multiple in the mid-teens, well below its own historical average, reflecting both the parks-driven earnings base and lingering skepticism about media. The 2026 dividend of ~$1.50 per share marks roughly a 50% increase over the ~$1.00 paid in 2025, continuing the recovery from the dividend's pandemic-era suspension. Figures are tied to the asOf date and reflect fiscal 2025 full-year and fiscal-Q2 2026 (ended March 28, 2026) reporting.

Headline figures (approximate, early 2026): AMZN shows revenue (ttm) ~$650 billion, operating margin ~10% (AWS materially higher; retail much lower), net income (ttm) ~$60 billion, eps (ttm) ~$5.50; DIS shows revenue (fy2025, ended sept 2025) ~$94.4 billion, total segment operating income (fy2025) ~$17.6 billion, experiences operating income (fiscal-q2 2026) ~$2.6 billion (record), streaming (disney+/hulu) operating income (fiscal-q2 2026) ~$582 million, up ~88% YoY.

AMZN and DIS are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AMZN and DIS exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.