COP vs MPC: How ConocoPhillips and Marathon Petroleum Corporation Compare (2026)
Last updated July 2026
Short answer
COP is the larger of the two ($144.00B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (13.13x forward earnings, beta 0.12). MPC is the smaller challenger ($90.08B), cheaper on forward earnings (11.11x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
COP vs MPC: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of July 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | COP | MPC | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $144.00B | $90.08B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 13.13 | 11.11 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 20.03 | 20.33 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.12 | 0.52 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 65% of range | 89% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.23 | 5.40 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: MPC is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how COP and MPC affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. COP and MPC share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined COP and MPC exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does ConocoPhillips (COP) do?
ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) is an exploration and production (E&P) company focused exclusively on the upstream segment of the oil and gas industry. It finds, develops, and produces crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids from a globally diversified asset base that includes U.S. Lower 48 shale plays (Permian, Eagle Ford, Bakken), Alaska (including the Willow development project), Canadian oil sands at Surmont, operations in Norway and Qatar, and equity stakes in LNG projects including Australia Pacific LNG and the Port Arthur LNG facility on the U.S. Gulf Coast. The company makes money by selling the hydrocarbons it produces at prevailing market prices, with profitability driven primarily by realized commodity prices, production volumes, and its cost-of-supply discipline. It does not operate refineries or fuel retail networks, giving it a focused capital structure but also direct exposure to commodity price swings.
What does Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) do?
Marathon Petroleum Corporation (NYSE: MPC), headquartered in Findlay, Ohio, is the largest independent downstream energy company in the United States. It operates through three segments: Refining and Marketing, which refines crude oil and other feedstocks at refineries across the Gulf Coast, Mid-Continent, and West Coast and sells gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, asphalt, and other products through wholesale channels and Marathon-branded and ARCO-branded retail outlets; Midstream, conducted primarily through its publicly traded partnership MPLX, which gathers, processes, transports, and stores crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids across an extensive pipeline, terminal, and storage network; and Renewable Diesel, which processes renewable feedstocks into renewable diesel for sale to wholesale customers and through long-term supply contracts. The company earns money from crude-to-products refining margins, midstream fee and distribution income from MPLX, and renewable diesel sales and associated regulatory credits.
COP vs MPC: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- COP drivers: Marathon Oil Integration and Scale; Willow Project and Long-Cycle Growth.
- MPC drivers: Scale Advantage in U.S. Refining; MPLX Midstream Provides a Durable Cash Floor.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: COP's revenues and free cash flow are highly sensitive to crude oil and natural gas prices, and any sustained commodity price decline would directly erode earnings and the company's ability to fund its capital-return targets. For MPC, the primary bear-case risk is crack spread compression: MPC's refining earnings are highly sensitive to the difference between crude oil input costs and refined product prices, and a normalization or decline in that spread (driven by demand softness, rising global refinery capacity coming back online, or a swift resolution of geopolitical tensions) would sharply reduce cash flows and pressure the valuation.
COP or MPC: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick COP if you believe its drivers more; MPC if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the COP and MPC guides.
COP vs MPC: the full fundamentals
COP. COP's trailing P/E of roughly 19x sits approximately 59 percent above its own 10-year median of around 12x and modestly above the oil and gas industry average of roughly 16x, suggesting the market is pricing in meaningful growth from Willow, LNG, and post-Marathon synergies. Free cash flow of roughly $5.85 billion TTM reflects elevated capital expenditures during the current heavy-investment cycle, and management projects a material step-up in free cash flow as long-cycle projects come online toward 2029. The dividend yield near 3.1 percent, combined with active buybacks, provides a tangible total-return component that partially compensates holders during periods of softer commodity prices.
MPC. MPC's trailing earnings multiple of roughly 17x sits modestly above the oil and gas refining industry average but below many broader market benchmarks, a valuation gap that reflects the inherent cyclicality of refining margins and the capital intensity of the business. Full-year 2025 adjusted earnings per diluted share of approximately $10.70 improved from 2024's $9.51 on a per-share basis, aided by ongoing share buybacks that reduced the share count. The strong return on equity of approximately 24% reflects both profitability and the company's leveraged balance sheet.
Headline figures (approximate, June 27, 2026): COP shows revenue (ttm, ~march 2026) ~$60.5 billion, net income (ttm) ~$7.3 billion, eps (ttm, dec 2025) ~$6.34, p/e ratio (ttm) ~19x; MPC shows revenue (fy 2025) ~$132.7 billion, net income (fy 2025) ~$4.0 billion, adjusted eps (fy 2025) ~$10.70 per diluted share, trailing p/e ratio ~17x (TTM, as of early June 2026).
The bottom line: COP vs MPC
COP and MPC are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined COP and MPC exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Investing in ConocoPhillips with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how COP fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between COP and MPC?
+
ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) is an exploration and production (E&P) company focused exclusively on the upstream segment of the oil and gas industry. Marathon Petroleum Corporation (NYSE: MPC), headquartered in Findlay, Ohio, is the largest independent downstream energy company in the United States. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is COP or MPC the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. COP is the larger incumbent; MPC is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, COP or MPC?
+
On forward P/E (as of July 2026), COP trades at 13.13x and MPC at 11.11x, so MPC is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both COP and MPC?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of COP vs MPC?
+
COP: COP's revenues and free cash flow are highly sensitive to crude oil and natural gas prices, and any sustained commodity price decline would directly erode earnings and the company's ability to fund its capital-return targets. The Willow project and LNG infrastructure carry significant construction and cost execution risk over a multi-year horizon, with capital outlays of roughly $12 billion guided for 2026 alone. Geopolitical disruptions in production regions including Qatar and Norway, along with energy transition policy shifts that suppress long-term hydrocarbon demand, represent structural risks that compound the near-term commodity exposure. At a trailing P/E near 19x, COP trades above its own 10-year median of roughly 12x and above the oil and gas industry average, leaving limited valuation cushion if earnings disappoint. MPC: The primary bear-case risk is crack spread compression: MPC's refining earnings are highly sensitive to the difference between crude oil input costs and refined product prices, and a normalization or decline in that spread (driven by demand softness, rising global refinery capacity coming back online, or a swift resolution of geopolitical tensions) would sharply reduce cash flows and pressure the valuation. The 3-2-1 crack spread has been running below its five-year average for extended periods since spring 2024, suggesting mean reversion is a real possibility. Additional risks include rising refining operating costs per barrel (which reached approximately $5.59 per barrel in Q3 2025, up from $5.23 a year prior), tightening environmental and renewable fuel regulations, and the capital intensity of compliance investments at facilities like the Los Angeles refinery. MPC also carries meaningful balance-sheet leverage, with a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 1.43.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell COP or MPC; figures are approximate and dated (as of July 2026). Verify current data before investing.