CSGP vs MCO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated October 2026
Short answer
MCO is the larger of the two ($84.00B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (25.63x forward earnings, beta 1.35). CSGP is the smaller challenger ($13.09B), cheaper on forward earnings (18.23x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
CSGP vs MCO: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | CSGP | MCO | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $13.09B | $84.00B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 18.23 | 25.63 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 179.50 | 30.78 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.80 | 1.35 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 12% of range | 57% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 1.65 | 27.77 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: CSGP is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how CSGP and MCO affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CSGP and MCO share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CSGP and MCO exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does CoStar Group (CSGP) do?
CoStar Group is a real-estate information, analytics, and online-marketplace company. Its core commercial franchise sells subscriptions to the CoStar database (property records, leasing, sales comparables, and analytics compiled by hundreds of researchers), LoopNet (the most-visited commercial listing marketplace), and Apartments.com (the leading multifamily rental marketplace). More recently the company has pushed into residential real estate with Homes.com, spending aggressively on marketing to challenge Zillow and Realtor.com. Revenue is largely recurring and subscription-based, which historically produced high margins and consistent growth across dozens of quarters.
What does Moody's (MCO) do?
Moody's is a global integrated risk-assessment company best known for credit ratings. It operates two main segments. Moody's Investors Service (MIS) rates the creditworthiness of bonds, loans, and other debt instruments issued by corporations, governments, and structured-finance vehicles, earning fees from issuers each time debt is rated. Moody's Analytics (MA) sells subscription software, data, research, and models for credit risk, economic forecasting, regulatory compliance, and increasingly ESG and supply-chain risk. Together with S&P Global, Moody's forms half of an effective duopoly in credit ratings, an industry protected by deep regulatory entrenchment, network effects, and the trust embedded in its ratings over more than a century. The ratings business is highly profitable and cyclical with debt-issuance volumes, while Moody's Analytics provides growing, recurring subscription revenue that smooths the cycle. Founded in 1909 and headquartered in New York, Moody's is a high-margin compounder tied to the global flow of capital and debt. Over the trailing twelve months to mid-2026 it generated about $8.2 billion of revenue and $2.8 billion of net income, with an operating margin near 49%.
CSGP vs MCO: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- CSGP drivers: Commercial data moat and pricing power; Residential expansion with Homes.com.
- MCO drivers: Ratings duopoly and pricing power; Moody's Analytics recurring revenue.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Reported profitability has been thin because of heavy Homes.com marketing, so the residential bet remains unproven and could keep depressing margins if audience and agent revenue disappoint. For MCO, the ratings segment is cyclical: debt issuance falls sharply when interest rates rise quickly or credit markets freeze, directly pressuring MIS revenue.
CSGP or MCO: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CSGP if you believe its drivers more; MCO if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CSGP and MCO guides.
CSGP vs MCO: the full fundamentals
CSGP. CoStar's trailing P/E near 177x is a by-product of tiny net income (about $74 million over twelve months), so the forward multiple near 18x is the more useful gauge, and it has compressed sharply as the share price halved in 2026. Analysts compiled by Yahoo Finance expect about $1.36 of EPS in 2026 on revenue near $3.79 billion, rising to about $1.77 in 2027. The valuation now prices meaningful doubt about Apartments.com and Homes.com, with an average target of about $37 across 20 analysts.
MCO. At about $482 a share on October 16, 2026, Moody's trades near 31x trailing and 25x forward earnings, a lower multiple than at the start of the year because earnings grew faster than the share price, which is down about 3% year to date. The valuation still embeds steady double-digit EPS growth and durable issuance volumes. Third-quarter results on October 21 are the next test.
Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): CSGP shows revenue (ttm) ~$3.56 billion, revenue growth (q2 2026, yoy) ~18%, q2 2026 results ~$925 million revenue; adjusted EPS $0.32 vs $0.29 consensus, margins (ttm gross / operating / net) ~79% / ~8% / ~2%; MCO shows revenue (ttm) ~$8.2 billion, up ~15% year over year in the latest quarter, operating margin ~49%, net income (ttm) ~$2.8 billion, eps (ttm / forward) ~$15.76 / ~$18.93.
The bottom line: CSGP vs MCO
CSGP and MCO are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CSGP and MCO exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how CSGP or MCO fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in CoStar Group with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how CSGP fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between CSGP and MCO?
+
CoStar Group is a real-estate information, analytics, and online-marketplace company. Moody's is a global integrated risk-assessment company best known for credit ratings. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is CSGP or MCO the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. MCO is the larger incumbent; CSGP is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, CSGP or MCO?
+
On forward P/E (as of October 2026), CSGP trades at 18.23x and MCO at 25.63x, so CSGP is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both CSGP and MCO?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of CSGP vs MCO?
+
CSGP: Reported profitability has been thin because of heavy Homes.com marketing, so the residential bet remains unproven and could keep depressing margins if audience and agent revenue disappoint. The stock trades at a very high trailing earnings multiple (about 177x in October 2026, against about 18x forward), which leaves it sensitive to any slowdown in growth or delay in the margin inflection. Apartments.com has shown weakness that the company now needs to reverse, and analysts including Deutsche Bank have cut 2027 estimates and targets for information-services stocks on a higher cost of capital. Commercial-real-estate activity is cyclical and can soften subscription growth when transaction volumes and leasing weaken. Residential competition against entrenched incumbents like Zillow is intense and expensive. Large acquisitions add integration and capital-allocation risk, and a premium valuation magnifies the downside if execution slips. MCO: The ratings segment is cyclical: debt issuance falls sharply when interest rates rise quickly or credit markets freeze, directly pressuring MIS revenue. Moody's also carries reputational and regulatory risk, a legacy of the 2008 financial crisis when rating agencies were criticized for structured-credit ratings; new regulation or liability rulings could weigh on the model. Competition from S&P Global, Fitch, and smaller rating providers, plus the rise of in-house and AI-driven risk tools, is a long-term consideration. The premium valuation embeds steady growth, so issuance downturns or multiple compression can hit the stock. Currency exposure and integration risk on acquisitions add further variability. Ahead of the October 21, 2026 report, RBC, Jefferies, JPMorgan and BMO all lowered price targets, and consensus for the December 2026 quarter implies EPS roughly flat to slightly down year over year, so the near-term issuance outlook is the swing factor.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell CSGP or MCO; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.