DSGX vs MANH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

MANH is the larger of the two ($11.16B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (31.29x forward earnings, beta 0.97). DSGX is the smaller challenger ($6.44B), cheaper on forward earnings (23.11x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

DSGX vs MANH: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricDSGXMANHWhat it tells you
Market cap$6.44B$11.16BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E23.1131.29Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E37.3954.99Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.190.97Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range27% of range71% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book3.9655.18How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: DSGX is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how DSGX and MANH affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. DSGX and MANH share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined DSGX and MANH exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does The Descartes Systems Group (DSGX) do?

The Descartes Systems Group provides on-demand, cloud-based software for logistics-intensive businesses, connecting shippers, carriers, brokers, freight forwarders and customs authorities through its Global Logistics Network. Its products route, schedule, track and measure deliveries, plan and execute shipments, and automate customs filings, trade compliance and global trade intelligence. Roughly 90%+ of revenue is recurring services (subscription and transaction-based), which gives the business a resilient, high-visibility revenue base across freight cycles.

Full DSGX guide

What does Manhattan Associates (MANH) do?

Manhattan Associates (MANH) builds supply chain and omnichannel commerce software used by large retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, and logistics providers. Its core products are warehouse management (WMS), transportation management (TMS), and order management and point-of-sale systems, unified under the cloud-native Manhattan Active platform. The software helps companies run distribution centers, route freight, manage inventory across channels, and fulfill orders, and Manhattan pairs it with a large professional services organization that implements and configures the systems. Founded in 1990 and headquartered in Atlanta, Manhattan is widely regarded as a leader in warehouse and transportation execution, competing on depth of functionality and high customer win rates rather than on being the cheapest option.

Full MANH guide

DSGX vs MANH: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • DSGX drivers: Recurring, network-based SaaS model; Acquisition-led compounding.
  • MANH drivers: Cloud subscription momentum; Rising RPO and backlog visibility.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: A weak and uncertain freight market can slow transaction-based revenue and dampen organic growth, since some Descartes revenue scales with shipment volumes. For MANH, the largest risk is valuation: MANH trades at a premium software multiple, so any deceleration in cloud growth, bookings, or RPO can trigger sharp multiple compression.

DSGX or MANH: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick DSGX if you believe its drivers more; MANH if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the DSGX and MANH guides.

DSGX vs MANH: the full fundamentals

DSGX. Descartes reported record first-quarter fiscal 2027 revenue of about $194 million, up 15% year over year, with adjusted EBITDA at record levels. The company holds roughly $377 million in cash against about $8 million of debt, so its enterprise value is modestly below its market cap. The premium earnings multiple reflects the market pricing in continued high-margin, recurring-revenue growth.

MANH. Manhattan trades at a premium multiple that reflects its category leadership, recurring cloud model, and expanding backlog rather than its headline revenue growth, which is in the high single digits during the cloud transition. Management raised full-year 2026 adjusted EPS guidance to roughly $5.29 to $5.37 after a first quarter that beat on revenue. The valuation prices in continued execution, so the stock is sensitive to any wobble in cloud bookings or RPO.

Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): DSGX shows revenue (ttm) ~$755M, fy2026 revenue ~$729M (up ~12%), net income (fy2026) ~$164M (~22% margin), adjusted ebitda margin ~40%; MANH shows revenue (ttm) ~$1.1 billion, 2026 revenue guidance ~$1.147 to $1.157 billion, cloud subscription growth ~24% year over year, rpo (backlog) ~$2.35 billion, up ~24%.

The bottom line: DSGX vs MANH

DSGX and MANH are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined DSGX and MANH exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how DSGX or MANH fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in The Descartes Systems Group with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how DSGX fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between DSGX and MANH?

+

The Descartes Systems Group provides on-demand, cloud-based software for logistics-intensive businesses, connecting shippers, carriers, brokers, freight forwarders and customs authorities through its Global Logistics Network. Manhattan Associates (MANH) builds supply chain and omnichannel commerce software used by large retailers, wholesalers, manufacturers, and logistics providers. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is DSGX or MANH the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. MANH is the larger incumbent; DSGX is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, DSGX or MANH?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), DSGX trades at 23.11x and MANH at 31.29x, so DSGX is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both DSGX and MANH?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of DSGX vs MANH?

+

DSGX: A weak and uncertain freight market can slow transaction-based revenue and dampen organic growth, since some Descartes revenue scales with shipment volumes. Tariff shifts and trade disruptions cut both ways, adding compliance demand but also potentially reducing overall trade activity. The stock's premium valuation leaves little room for growth disappointments, and any deceleration below the market's expectations could compress the multiple sharply. Growth also depends heavily on continued successful acquisitions, which carry integration and capital-allocation risk. Finally, competition from larger logistics-software and ERP vendors could pressure pricing or win rates over time. MANH: The largest risk is valuation: MANH trades at a premium software multiple, so any deceleration in cloud growth, bookings, or RPO can trigger sharp multiple compression. Services revenue, roughly half of total revenue, is lower margin and more sensitive to customer implementation budgets, which can soften in a weak economy or when retail and logistics capital spending slows. Manhattan competes with much larger players such as SAP, Oracle, and Panasonic-owned Blue Yonder that can bundle supply chain modules under existing ERP relationships. Large enterprise deals can be lumpy and elongate in uncertain macro conditions, and the cloud transition, while improving revenue quality, caps near-term reported growth as license revenue disappears. Execution on AI features is promising but unproven at scale.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell DSGX or MANH; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    DSGX vs MANH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App