EVCM vs TTAN: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: EVCM is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. EVCM and TTAN share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined EVCM and TTAN exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

EverCommerce sells vertically-tailored SaaS to service-based small and medium businesses, organised into three brands: EverPro for home services (contractors, HVAC, roofing, home maintenance), EverHealth for health services (physician practices, therapists) and EverWell for wellness (salons, spas). As of the end of 2025 the platform served more than 745,000 customers. Each vertical follows the same pattern: business management software becomes the system of record for scheduling and job management, then billing and payment solutions ride on top of it, then customer experience tools (reviews, messaging, marketing) layer on. Payments are the monetisation engine, with roughly ~$13.0B of annualized processing volume as of the fourth quarter of 2025 against a customer base the company estimates could eventually run more than $100B through it. Nearly all of the revenue base, about ~97%, is recurring or re-occurring.

Full EVCM guide

ServiceTitan, Inc. (Nasdaq: TTAN) builds cloud software that serves as the end-to-end operating system for commercial and residential trades businesses, including HVAC, plumbing, electrical, roofing, garage-door, chimney, and landscaping contractors. Its platform bundles customer relationship management, scheduling and dispatch, call booking, marketing, sales and estimating, project management, invoicing, financing, and payroll into one system, and it layers on payments processing and other financial-technology products. ServiceTitan earns revenue primarily from software subscriptions and from usage-based fees tied to gross transaction volume (the dollar value of business its customers run through the platform), which was about $82.1 billion in fiscal 2026, so the more a contractor grows on ServiceTitan, the more ServiceTitan tends to earn.

Full TTAN guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• EVCM drivers: Payments attach on an installed base that is already there; Agentic AI as the reason to raise price rather than seats.
• TTAN drivers: Large underpenetrated trades market; Usage-based and fintech revenue expansion.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Growth is the central problem: ~2.7% reported and ~2.0% pro forma revenue growth with net revenue retention at ~94% describes a business where churn and downgrades are nearly cancelling out new sales and price increases, and management has already guided 2026 to the low end. For TTAN, serviceTitan remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis, with a fiscal 2026 net loss of about $160 million and an accumulated deficit near $1.3 billion, so continued heavy investment in sales and product weighs on reported earnings.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick EVCM if you believe its drivers more; TTAN if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the EVCM and TTAN guides.

EVCM. Full-year 2026 guidance calls for ~$612M to ~$632M of revenue and ~$183M to ~$191M of adjusted EBITDA, with management saying in August that results should trend toward the lower end of both. On the low end that puts the stock near ~12x forward EV/adjusted EBITDA, which is cheap against high-growth vertical SaaS and unremarkable against a business compounding revenue at ~2%. Goodwill of ~$892.5M against ~$1.36B of total assets is the arithmetic signature of the roll-up: the market is currently valuing the whole enterprise at roughly 2.4x the goodwill carried from past deals.

TTAN. ServiceTitan trades as a premium-multiple growth software stock, with a price-to-sales ratio around 11 times that sits well above the broader U.S. software average, reflecting its roughly 24% growth and strong retention. It pays no dividend, and because GAAP earnings are still negative, investors typically value it on revenue growth, gross-dollar retention, and the trajectory toward positive operating margins rather than on a price-to-earnings basis. Figures are approximate and as of July 2026; check the latest filings for current numbers.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): EVCM shows revenue (ttm) ~$598.1M, with Q2 2026 revenue of ~$152.0M up ~2.7% year over year and ~2.0% pro forma, adjusted ebitda (ttm) ~$175.8M, about a ~29% margin; Q2 2026 was ~$44.5M versus ~$45.0M a year earlier, gaap net income (ttm) ~$34M from continuing operations, or ~$0.05 per share in the June quarter, free cash flow (ttm) ~$72M, from ~$107M of operating cash flow less ~$35M of capital expenditure and capitalized software; TTAN shows revenue (fy2026, ended jan 2026) ~$961 million (up ~24%), revenue (ttm) ~$1.0 billion, gross transaction volume (fy2026) ~$82.1 billion (up ~20%), gaap net loss (fy2026) ~$160 million (vs ~$239 million prior).

EVCM and TTAN are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined EVCM and TTAN exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.