FLS vs IR: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
FLS and IR are similarly sized, but FLS trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (16.47x vs 21.61x): the market is paying up for IR's profile and pricing FLS more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.
FLS vs IR: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | FLS | IR | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward P/E | 16.47 | 21.61 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 26.48 | 34.45 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.25 | 1.17 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 62% of range | 47% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 4.28 | 3.21 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: FLS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how FLS and IR affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. FLS and IR share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined FLS and IR exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Flowserve Corporation (FLS) do?
Flowserve Corporation is one of the world's largest suppliers of flow-control equipment. It designs, makes, and services pumps, valves, actuators, and mechanical seals used to move and control liquids and gases in demanding industrial settings. The business runs through two segments: Flowserve Pumps and Engineered Solutions (its larger unit, including seals) and Flow Control (valves and automation). A defining feature is its large installed base, which drives a high-margin aftermarket business of spare parts, repairs, and service that generates recurring revenue even when new-project orders slow. Its end markets skew to oil and gas, chemicals, general industries, power generation, and increasingly water.
What does Ingersoll Rand (IR) do?
Ingersoll Rand is a global industrial-technology company built around mission-critical air, fluid, gas, and medical technologies. It operates through two segments: Industrial Technologies and Services, which sells air compressors, vacuum and blower systems, air treatment, power tools, and lifting equipment; and Precision and Science Technologies, which makes highly engineered pumps and fluid-management systems for medical, life-science, and specialty industrial uses. The company was formed in 2020 when Gardner Denver merged with the Industrial segment of the old Ingersoll-Rand, and it sells under brands such as Ingersoll Rand, Gardner Denver, Nash, and many acquired niche names. A large share of revenue comes from aftermarket parts, consumables, and service on a big installed base, which makes results steadier than a pure equipment maker. Ingersoll Rand is headquartered in Davidson, North Carolina.
FLS vs IR: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- FLS drivers: Aftermarket and installed base; 3D growth strategy and new end markets.
- IR drivers: IRX operating system and margins; Disciplined bolt-on M&A.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Flowserve's orders are cyclical and tied to capital spending in oil and gas, chemicals, and power, which can fall sharply when commodity prices or industrial demand weaken. For IR, ingersoll Rand's end markets are cyclical and tied to global industrial capital spending, manufacturing activity, and specific verticals like energy and semiconductors, so downturns can slow orders and short-cycle revenue.
FLS or IR: which should you pick?
FLS vs IR: the full fundamentals
FLS. Flowserve trades as a mid-cap industrial at roughly 18 times normalized earnings and around 1.9 times sales, valuations that embed expectations for margin expansion and its 3D growth push. The Chart merger termination left the balance sheet flush, with cash near $792 million reported in early 2026. Figures are approximate and as of July 2026; actual results move with each quarterly report.
IR. Ingersoll Rand trades at a premium to the average industrial, reflecting its high aftermarket and mission-critical mix, consistent margin expansion under IRX, and disciplined free-cash-flow-funded M&A. Q1 2026 revenue was about $1.85 billion, up roughly 8 percent, with adjusted EPS near $0.77, and management maintained full-year guidance of about 2.5 to 4.5 percent revenue growth and roughly $3.45 to $3.57 adjusted EPS. The dividend is nominal because the company prioritizes reinvestment and acquisitions over payouts.
Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): FLS shows revenue (fy2025) ~$4.7 billion, revenue (q1 2026) ~$1.07 billion (down ~7% YoY), adjusted eps (fy2025) ~$3.64, backlog (year-end 2025) ~$2.9 billion; IR shows revenue (2025) ~$7.65 billion, revenue (q1 2026) ~$1.85 billion, up ~8% YoY, 2026 revenue growth guide ~2.5% to 4.5%, 2026 adjusted eps guide ~$3.45 to $3.57.
The bottom line: FLS vs IR
FLS and IR are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined FLS and IR exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how FLS or IR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Flowserve Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how FLS fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between FLS and IR?
+
Flowserve Corporation is one of the world's largest suppliers of flow-control equipment. Ingersoll Rand is a global industrial-technology company built around mission-critical air, fluid, gas, and medical technologies. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is FLS or IR the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, FLS or IR?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), FLS trades at 16.47x and IR at 21.61x, so FLS is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both FLS and IR?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of FLS vs IR?
+
FLS: Flowserve's orders are cyclical and tied to capital spending in oil and gas, chemicals, and power, which can fall sharply when commodity prices or industrial demand weaken. Q1 2026 revenue declined about 7% year over year, partly due to Middle East conflict that management estimated as a roughly $50 million bookings headwind and a $0.06 per share drag, showing its exposure to geopolitical disruption. The company also faces tariff and supply-chain cost pressure, foreign-exchange swings from its heavily international footprint, and intense competition that can compress pricing. The failed Chart merger removed a potential scale catalyst, so growth now rests on standalone execution. Finally, project delays or a broader industrial slowdown could pressure backlog conversion and margins. IR: Ingersoll Rand's end markets are cyclical and tied to global industrial capital spending, manufacturing activity, and specific verticals like energy and semiconductors, so downturns can slow orders and short-cycle revenue. The serial-acquisition strategy carries integration, execution, and valuation risk, and heavy reliance on M&A means growth can disappoint if the deal pipeline slows or purchase multiples rise. Foreign-exchange swings, tariffs, and supply-chain disruptions can pressure results given the global footprint. Competition across compression and flow control is intense, including from larger and lower-cost rivals. The stock trades at a premium to the average industrial, so any slowdown in margin gains or capital deployment can weigh on the multiple.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell FLS or IR; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.