HAS vs LTH: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
HAS is the larger of the two ($13.15B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (14.28x forward earnings, beta 0.47). LTH is the smaller challenger ($9.35B), actually pricier on forward earnings (20.49x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
HAS vs LTH: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | HAS | LTH | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $13.15B | $9.35B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 14.28 | 20.49 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 16.58 | 22.86 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 0.47 | 1.50 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 63% of range | 77% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 18.67 | 2.83 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: HAS is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how HAS and LTH affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. HAS and LTH share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined HAS and LTH exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Hasbro (HAS) do?
Hasbro is a global play-and-entertainment company that owns brands including Magic: The Gathering, Dungeons & Dragons, Monopoly, Nerf, Transformers, Play-Doh, and My Little Pony. It reports in three segments: Wizards of the Coast and Digital Gaming (trading card games plus licensed video and mobile games like Monopoly Go!), Consumer Products (physical toys and games), and Entertainment (licensing and film/TV). The business has shifted decisively toward higher-margin gaming and licensing, with Wizards now the primary profit and growth engine.
What does Life Time Group Holdings (LTH) do?
Life Time Group Holdings runs more than 190 large-format athletic country clubs across the United States and Canada, pairing gyms with pools, spas, pickleball and tennis courts, cafes, coworking spaces and a digital platform of classes and events. It positions itself at the premium end of the fitness market, charging average monthly dues around $230 and average revenue per membership near $930, and it has been deliberately shifting toward higher-value members and away from lower-paying insurance-administered memberships. Revenue reached roughly $3.0 billion in 2025 and continued to climb in early 2026, with the company profitable and expanding.
HAS vs LTH: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- HAS drivers: Magic: The Gathering as the profit engine; Digital and licensed gaming.
- LTH drivers: Premium membership pricing and mix shift; New club expansion and footprint growth.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Revenue and profit concentration in Magic: The Gathering is the central risk, since a cooling of that franchise would hit results disproportionately given its outsized margin contribution. For LTH, the most cited risk is heavy capital spending and reliance on sale-leasebacks, which can squeeze cash flow and margins if financing conditions worsen or rents rise.
HAS or LTH: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick HAS if you believe its drivers more; LTH if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the HAS and LTH guides.
HAS vs LTH: the full fundamentals
HAS. As of JULY 2026 Hasbro traded around ~$76 for a market cap near ~$11.3 billion. Trailing GAAP earnings are distorted by prior impairment charges (producing a negative reported P/E), so investors lean on adjusted metrics, where Q1 2026 adjusted EPS was ~$1.47 and full-year adjusted EBITDA is guided to ~$1.40-1.45 billion. The ~3.6% dividend yield reflects a $0.70 quarterly payout.
LTH. Life Time grew 2025 revenue about 14% to roughly $3.0 billion and kept expanding in early 2026, with Q1 revenue near $789 million and adjusted EBITDA up double digits. The stock trades at a trailing P/E in the mid-20s, a premium reflecting expected growth from new clubs and rising dues. The roughly $4.2 billion debt load and sale-leaseback reliance are the main counterweights to that valuation.
Headline figures (approximate, JULY 2026): HAS shows revenue (ttm) ~$4.8B, q1 2026 revenue ~$1.0B (up ~13% YoY), market cap ~$11.3B, stock price ~$76; LTH shows revenue (ttm) ~$3.1B, q1 2026 revenue ~$789M (up ~11.7% YoY), net income (ttm) ~$400M, market cap ~$9.4B.
The bottom line: HAS vs LTH
HAS and LTH are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined HAS and LTH exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how HAS or LTH fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Hasbro with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how HAS fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between HAS and LTH?
+
Hasbro is a global play-and-entertainment company that owns brands including Magic: The Gathering, Dungeons & Dragons, Monopoly, Nerf, Transformers, Play-Doh, and My Little Pony. Life Time Group Holdings runs more than 190 large-format athletic country clubs across the United States and Canada, pairing gyms with pools, spas, pickleball and tennis courts, cafes, coworking spaces and a digital platform of classes and events. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is HAS or LTH the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. HAS is the larger incumbent; LTH is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, HAS or LTH?
+
On forward P/E (as of September 2026), HAS trades at 14.28x and LTH at 20.49x, so HAS is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both HAS and LTH?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of HAS vs LTH?
+
HAS: Revenue and profit concentration in Magic: The Gathering is the central risk, since a cooling of that franchise would hit results disproportionately given its outsized margin contribution. The Consumer Products (toy) segment remains weak, posting an operating loss in Q1 2026 amid soft demand and tariff costs modeled at ~$100 million-plus for the year. Long-term debt of ~$3.6 billion as of March 2026, including notes maturing in late 2026, keeps leverage a watch item. Trailing GAAP results are distorted by prior-period impairment charges, so headline GAAP profitability can look negative even when adjusted earnings are strong. Broader consumer-spending pressure and a heavy reliance on hit-driven entertainment and gaming cycles add volatility. LTH: The most cited risk is heavy capital spending and reliance on sale-leasebacks, which can squeeze cash flow and margins if financing conditions worsen or rents rise. The company carries a large debt load of roughly $4.2 billion against modest cash, leaving net debt to equity around 42%. Premium memberships are discretionary, so a consumer slowdown or recession could pressure sign-ups and retention at the high price point. Rapid new-club openings raise execution risk if individual projects underperform their payback expectations. Competition from Equinox, boutique studios and lower-cost chains adds pressure on member acquisition and pricing.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell HAS or LTH; figures are approximate and dated (as of September 2026). Verify current data before investing.