HYMC vs NEM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

NEM is the larger of the two ($98.74B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (8.85x forward earnings, beta 0.48). HYMC is the smaller challenger ($1.82B), priced similarly on forward earnings (-28.10x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

HYMC vs NEM: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricHYMCNEMWhat it tells you
Market cap$1.82B$98.74BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E-28.108.85Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Beta2.720.48Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range29% of range43% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book7.252.82How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Before you buy: how HYMC and NEM affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. HYMC and NEM share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined HYMC and NEM exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Hycroft Mining (HYMC) do?

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMC) owns and is developing the Hycroft mine, a gold and silver project in Nevada, USA, with a very large mineral resource and substantial existing infrastructure. The company is essentially pre-revenue: rather than steadily producing metal, it is advancing technical studies and an exploration drill program aimed at defining how to mine and process the deposit economically. The deposit is largely a sulfide ore body, which is harder to process than simple oxide ore; Hycroft has been studying processing routes including conventional pressure oxidation (POX) and heap leach, and in June 2026 it released a technical report summary outlining a long-life milling-and-heap-leach mine plan and large headline net-present-value figures at then-current metals prices. Because nothing is in commercial production yet, the company would make money in the future only if it builds the mine and sells gold and silver at prices above its costs. This is a speculative, development-stage situation, not a profitable producer.

Full HYMC guide

What does Newmont (NEM) do?

Newmont (NEM) is the world's largest gold producer and a leading name in precious-metals mining. It explores for, mines, and sells gold, with meaningful byproduct production of copper, silver, zinc, and lead from a global portfolio of tier-one operations across North America, South America, Australia, Africa, and Papua New Guinea. Gold is the company's core driver, and its revenue and profits move closely with the gold price, which it does not control and which tends to rise with inflation fears, falling real interest rates, and market or geopolitical stress. Newmont expanded its scale and reserves through the 2023 acquisition of Newcrest Mining and has since worked to streamline the combined portfolio around its highest-quality, longest-life assets while returning cash through dividends and buybacks. As a commodity producer, Newmont's earnings swing with gold and byproduct prices as well as mining costs. Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, it is widely viewed as a large-cap, liquid way to gain equity exposure to gold, often held as a diversifier or an inflation and safe-haven hedge rather than as a steady compounder.

Full NEM guide

HYMC vs NEM: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • HYMC drivers: Large Nevada Resource Base; Leverage to Gold and Silver Prices.
  • NEM drivers: Leveraged exposure to gold; Scale, tier-one assets, and reserves.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The dominant risk is that Hycroft is pre-major-production and must still prove that it can process its predominantly sulfide ore economically; earlier attempts at the site struggled with processing, and the chosen route and project economics in technical studies are not the same as a built, operating mine. For NEM, newmont is a commodity producer, so its revenue and profits swing with the gold price and byproduct metal prices it does not control, and those prices can fall sharply.

HYMC or NEM: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick HYMC if you believe its drivers more; NEM if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the HYMC and NEM guides.

HYMC vs NEM: the full fundamentals

HYMC. Hycroft's valuation cannot be assessed on conventional earnings multiples because it has essentially no revenue and reports net losses, so price-to-earnings figures are not meaningful. Instead the market prices the company on the potential value of its in-ground gold and silver resource, the credibility of its development studies, and the prevailing prices of gold and silver. A roughly $2 billion market capitalization on a pre-production developer reflects optimism about resource potential and metals-price leverage rather than current cash flows, which makes the shares speculative and sensitive to study results, drilling news, and commodity prices.

NEM. Newmont's valuation is inherently cyclical because earnings move with the gold price and mining costs the company does not fully control. A normal P/E can look low near the top of the gold cycle and high or not meaningful at the bottom, so the stock often trades on the gold-price outlook, real interest rates, and cost trends rather than trailing earnings. Rising all-in sustaining costs can compress margins even when gold is firm. Figures are approximate and move with commodity prices; verify current numbers before relying on them.

Headline figures (approximate, 2026-06-27): HYMC shows stage / revenue Pre-major-production developer; essentially no commercial production revenue, cash and debt ~$189 million cash (Q1 2026), reported ~$194 million as of Feb 28, 2026; debt-free balance sheet, measured & indicated resource ~16.4 million oz gold and ~562 million oz silver (early 2026), up ~55% over prior estimate, net loss (q1 2026) ~$48 million (widened from ~$12 million a year earlier on higher exploration and stock-based compensation); NEM shows revenue (ttm) ~$20 billion (varies with gold prices), primary product gold, with byproduct copper, silver, zinc, and lead, gold production (2025) ~5.9 million attributable ounces, gold aisc (2025) ~$1,358 per ounce by-product basis; guided higher for 2026.

The bottom line: HYMC vs NEM

HYMC and NEM are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined HYMC and NEM exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how HYMC or NEM fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Hycroft Mining with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how HYMC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between HYMC and NEM?

+

Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (NASDAQ: HYMC) owns and is developing the Hycroft mine, a gold and silver project in Nevada, USA, with a very large mineral resource and substantial existing infrastructure. Newmont (NEM) is the world's largest gold producer and a leading name in precious-metals mining. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is HYMC or NEM the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. NEM is the larger incumbent; HYMC is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, HYMC or NEM?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), HYMC trades at -28.10x and NEM at 8.85x, so HYMC is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both HYMC and NEM?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of HYMC vs NEM?

+

HYMC: The dominant risk is that Hycroft is pre-major-production and must still prove that it can process its predominantly sulfide ore economically; earlier attempts at the site struggled with processing, and the chosen route and project economics in technical studies are not the same as a built, operating mine. The company generates essentially no revenue and continues to burn cash on exploration and overhead (its Q1 2026 net loss widened to roughly $48 million), so it will likely need to raise more capital over time, and additional equity issuance dilutes existing holders. The entire investment case depends on gold and silver prices remaining strong, since weaker metals prices would undercut the modeled economics and the implied value of in-ground ounces. Execution, permitting, construction-capital, and timeline risk are all material, and the stock can be volatile and sentiment-driven given its development stage and history. NEM: Newmont is a commodity producer, so its revenue and profits swing with the gold price and byproduct metal prices it does not control, and those prices can fall sharply. Mining is capital intensive and carries operational, geological, environmental, permitting, and safety risks, and unexpected mine problems can cut production. Its global footprint exposes it to country-specific political, regulatory, tax, currency, and labor risks. All-in sustaining costs have risen with energy, labor, and input inflation, squeezing margins if gold does not keep pace. Large acquisitions like Newcrest carry integration and execution risk. The stock is volatile and tied to gold sentiment, real interest rates, and the US dollar. It is a cyclical position, not a steady income or defensive holding.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell HYMC or NEM; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    HYMC vs NEM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App