MDT vs SOLV: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: SOLV is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. MDT and SOLV share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined MDT and SOLV exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Medtronic is one of the largest medical device companies in the world, designing, manufacturing, and selling therapies and devices across a broad range of chronic and acute conditions. Its business spans three main areas after October 2026: Cardiovascular (pacemakers, defibrillators, heart valves, and cardiac ablation), Neuroscience (spine implants, neuromodulation for pain and movement disorders, and surgical navigation), and Medical Surgical (surgical stapling, energy devices, and a growing robotic-surgery platform). Its former Diabetes unit (insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring) was carved out as MiniMed, which listed on Nasdaq under MMED; on October 15, 2026 Medtronic exchanged its remaining 252.8 million MiniMed shares for Medtronic shares in an exchange offer that was 5.4 times subscribed, so it no longer owns any of MiniMed. The company sells primarily to hospitals, surgeons, and health systems, generating durable, recurring demand tied to procedure volumes and chronic-disease management. Medtronic's scale gives it deep relationships with providers, a large installed base of devices, and the resources to fund extensive R&D and acquisitions. Growth depends on new product cycles, pipeline approvals, and global expansion, especially in emerging markets. Founded in 1949 and headquartered in Ireland for tax purposes (operationally rooted in Minnesota), Medtronic is a large-cap, dividend-growing medical-technology company tied to long-term healthcare demand and aging demographics, with trailing revenue of about $37.5 billion as of October 2026.

Full MDT guide

Solventum is a healthcare company that was spun off from 3M in 2024, combining 3M's former Health Care business into a standalone public company. It operates across several healthcare segments: medical surgical products (wound care, advanced dressings, surgical supplies, infection prevention), dental and orthodontic solutions, health information systems (clinical documentation, coding, and revenue-cycle software for hospitals), and purification and filtration (including water and biopharma filtration). The company makes money selling consumable medical products to hospitals and clinics, software and services to health systems, and filtration technology to industrial and life-science customers. As a recent spin-off, Solventum's story centers on standing up independent operations, paying down debt inherited at separation, stabilizing growth, and improving margins. It holds established brands and large installed bases in several niches. Headquartered in Maplewood, Minnesota, it serves customers across hospital, dental, and industrial end markets globally. Over the twelve months to June 2026, revenue was about $8.3 billion, growing in the low single digits, and the company employed roughly 20,600 people.

Full SOLV guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• MDT drivers: Diversified device portfolio; Innovation pipeline and new product cycles.
• SOLV drivers: Recurring consumable and software revenue; Spin-off self-help and margin expansion.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Medtronic has at times delivered sluggish organic growth, raising concerns that its scale slows innovation relative to nimbler competitors like Boston Scientific and Edwards Lifesciences. For SOLV, as a recent spin-off, Solventum carries meaningful debt taken on at separation (about $5.3 billion against roughly $0.4 billion of cash in mid-2026) and must prove it can grow organically after years inside 3M, where the business reportedly underinvested; revenue grew only about 2% year over year in the June 2026 quarter.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick MDT if you believe its drivers more; SOLV if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the MDT and SOLV guides.

MDT. At about $95 on October 16, 2026, Medtronic trades near 15 times forward earnings, a moderate multiple next to faster-growing medtech peers, while the GAAP trailing P/E of about 23x includes acquisition amortization. The 25 analysts tracked by Yahoo Finance hold a mean target near $104. The next report, expected around November 17, 2026, will be the first read on the company after the MiniMed exit, with consensus at about $1.33 of EPS on $9.5 billion of revenue.

SOLV. Solventum still trades at a discount to faster-growing medtech peers (about 12x forward earnings and under 2x sales in October 2026), a gap explained by slow top-line growth, elevated post-spin debt, and the work still required to prove independent execution. The trailing P/E near 10.5x flatters the picture because GAAP earnings include an unusually large September 2025 quarter. Analysts expect about $7.14 of EPS in 2026 and ~$7.25 in 2027, so successful deleveraging and margin work, more than revenue growth, remain the swing factors.

Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): MDT shows revenue (ttm) ~$37.5 billion, up ~14% year over year in the July 2026 quarter, margins ~65% gross, ~19% operating, ~14% net, net income (ttm) ~$5.2 billion, eps ~$4.07 GAAP trailing; ~$6.41 forward estimate; SOLV shows revenue (ttm) ~$8.3 billion, revenue growth ~2% year over year in Q2 2026, margins (ttm) gross ~55%, GAAP operating ~10%, q2 2026 adjusted eps $2.55 vs ~$1.91 consensus.

MDT and SOLV are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined MDT and SOLV exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.