NEXA vs SCCO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

SCCO is the larger of the two ($143.25B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (25.32x forward earnings, beta 1.12). NEXA is the smaller challenger ($2.04B), cheaper on forward earnings (4.99x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

NEXA vs SCCO: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricNEXASCCOWhat it tells you
Market cap$2.04B$143.25BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E4.9925.32Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E7.3726.95Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.931.12Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range88% of range71% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book1.6912.07How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: NEXA is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how NEXA and SCCO affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. NEXA and SCCO share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined NEXA and SCCO exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Nexa Resources (NEXA) do?

Nexa Resources S.A. is an integrated zinc business incorporated in Luxembourg, headquartered operationally in Brazil and Peru, and reporting in US dollars under IFRS. It runs five mines: Cerro Lindo, El Porvenir and Atacocha in Peru (the latter two forming the Cerro Pasco Complex) plus Vazante and Aripuanã in Brazil. Cerro Lindo and Vazante both sit among the world's thirty largest zinc-producing mines. It also owns three smelters, Cajamarquilla in Lima (the only operating zinc smelter in Peru and the fifth largest globally by volume), plus Três Marias and Juiz de Fora in Minas Gerais, which are the only units of their kind in Latin America excluding Mexico. Zinc accounted for ~46.9% of mined metal production in 2025 on a zinc-equivalent basis, with copper, lead, silver and a little gold produced as by-products that get credited against cash cost. The two segments are structurally different businesses: mining sells concentrate and earns the metal price, while smelting buys concentrate and earns a conversion spread, and in the second quarter of 2026 Nexa's own mines supplied ~54% of smelter feed.

Full NEXA guide

What does Southern Copper (SCCO) do?

Southern Copper (SCCO) is one of the largest integrated copper producers in the world, with operations concentrated in Peru and Mexico. The company mines, smelts, and refines copper and produces meaningful byproduct volumes of molybdenum, zinc, silver, and other metals, which help offset costs. Southern Copper is known for very large, long-life ore reserves and among the lowest cash costs in the industry, a structural advantage that lets it stay profitable across much of the commodity cycle. It is majority owned by Grupo Mexico, a large Mexican mining and infrastructure conglomerate, which influences capital allocation and strategy. The investment case is closely tied to the price of copper, a metal central to electrification, electric vehicles, renewable power, grid buildout, and construction. Southern Copper pursues a pipeline of expansion and greenfield projects to grow output over time, though large mining projects carry permitting, environmental, and social-license risk, particularly in Peru. Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, with primary operations in Latin America, SCCO is a high-dividend, commodity-leveraged miner whose results rise and fall with copper prices.

Full SCCO guide

NEXA vs SCCO: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • NEXA drivers: Zinc and silver prices are doing most of the work; Volume recovery is the internal story for the second half.
  • SCCO drivers: Low-cost, long-life reserves; Leverage to the copper demand thesis.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. For SCCO, southern Copper's earnings and dividend swing with the price of copper, a volatile commodity sensitive to global growth, China demand, and the dollar, so a copper downturn hits results directly.

NEXA or SCCO: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick NEXA if you believe its drivers more; SCCO if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the NEXA and SCCO guides.

NEXA vs SCCO: the full fundamentals

NEXA. Figures are approximate, stamped to August 2026, and drawn from the second-quarter 2026 earnings release filed on Form 6-K on August 5, 2026, the fiscal 2025 Form 20-F, and market data as of the August 21, 2026 close, so live data is worth checking before acting on any of them. Nexa reports in US dollars under IFRS, so no currency translation is needed to read the headline numbers, though Brazilian real movements still flow through the Brazilian cost base. Two mechanical points shape the multiples above: the trailing earnings figure benefits from metal prices well above the company's own guidance assumptions (~$2,850 per tonne zinc, ~$42.0 per ounce silver), and only ~46.8 million of the ~132.44 million shares trade publicly, so the market capitalization is set by a float worth roughly ~$720 million.

SCCO. Southern Copper's valuation moves with the copper price and the commodity cycle, and its dividend can vary with earnings rather than being fixed. The market often awards it a premium to peers for its low costs and long-life reserves, while applying a discount for political and concentration risk in Peru and Mexico and the Grupo Mexico ownership structure. Figures are approximate and move with copper prices and results; verify current revenue, P/E, and yield.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): NEXA shows revenue (ttm) ~$3.46 billion trailing twelve months, up ~24% versus ~$3.00 billion in fiscal 2025 and ~$2.77 billion in 2024; second-quarter 2026 net revenues ~$908 million (up ~28% year over year), first-half ~$1,796 million (up ~34%), earnings Trailing net income ~$278 million and trailing EPS ~$2.10 against ~$133 million and ~$1.00 for full-year 2025; second-quarter net income ~$98 million (~$0.52 per share) versus ~$13 million (~$0.01) a year earlier, with adjusted EPS ~$0.64, segment profitability Second-quarter Adjusted EBITDA ~$286 million (up ~78%) at a ~31.5% margin: mining ~$220 million (up ~63%, ~41.9% margin) and smelting ~$66 million (up ~162%, ~11.4% margin); trailing twelve-month Adjusted EBITDA ~$1,055 million versus ~$665 million a year earlier, cash generation and capital spending Operating cash flow before working capital ~$286 million in the quarter, offset by a ~$365 million first-half working-capital and other outflow that left first-half free cash flow at ~negative $136 million; 2026 capex guidance reaffirmed at ~$381 million with ~$160 million spent in the first half, plus ~$86 million guided for exploration and project evaluation; SCCO shows revenue (ttm) ~$11 billion-plus, varies with copper price (verify), profitability Profitable; margins swing with copper prices, cash cost position Among the lowest in the copper industry, p/e (ttm) ~20x to ~30x, varies with cycle (verify).

The bottom line: NEXA vs SCCO

NEXA and SCCO are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined NEXA and SCCO exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how NEXA or SCCO fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Nexa Resources with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how NEXA fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between NEXA and SCCO?

+

Nexa Resources S.A. Southern Copper (SCCO) is one of the largest integrated copper producers in the world, with operations concentrated in Peru and Mexico. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is NEXA or SCCO the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. SCCO is the larger incumbent; NEXA is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, NEXA or SCCO?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), NEXA trades at 4.99x and SCCO at 25.32x, so NEXA is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both NEXA and SCCO?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of NEXA vs SCCO?

+

NEXA: The dominant risk is that essentially all of the 2026 improvement traces to metal prices Nexa does not set: a reversion in zinc toward the ~$2,850 per tonne assumption that underlies its own cost guidance, or in silver from ~$73 per ounce, would compress a business whose smelting segment still earned only a ~11.4% Adjusted EBITDA margin in the quarter. Operational fragility is not theoretical either, since two fires occurred in a single quarter (Cajamarquilla's casting house in May, costing roughly ~7,000 tonnes of second-quarter refined zinc, and the Três Marias roasting-area cooling towers on May 19), and the Cajamarquilla root-cause and insurance loss adjustment were still open. Jurisdiction and permitting add a second layer: the Cerro Pasco Integration Project's estimated capex rose from ~$138 million to ~$180 million with the tailings pumping system slipping to ~1Q27 and shaft repowering deferred to ~2031, while the El Porvenir and Atacocha environmental study modifications remain under SENACE evaluation in Peru with approval expected in ~1Q27, and Brazilian real appreciation inflates US-dollar-reported costs at the Brazilian operations. On governance, VSA holds ~64.68% of a company incorporated in Luxembourg and listed only in New York, which leaves the ~35.32% public float (~46.8 million shares) with limited practical influence and no US-style proxy machinery, since Nexa reports as a foreign private issuer on Form 20-F and 6-K rather than 10-Q. Finally, the shares at ~$15.40 sit modestly above the ~$14.88 average target of the ~8 analysts covering the name, and any resolution of the Boliden discussions could reprice the stock in either direction independently of how the mines perform. SCCO: Southern Copper's earnings and dividend swing with the price of copper, a volatile commodity sensitive to global growth, China demand, and the dollar, so a copper downturn hits results directly. Operations are concentrated in Peru and Mexico, exposing the company to political, regulatory, tax, permitting, environmental, and social-license risk, and Peru in particular has seen protests and disruptions around mining projects. Majority ownership by Grupo Mexico means minority shareholders have limited control over capital allocation. Large expansion projects can face delays and cost overruns. Currency, energy-cost, and byproduct-price movements also affect margins. As with any single-commodity miner, SCCO is cyclical and not defensive.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell NEXA or SCCO; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    NEXA vs SCCO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App