NYT vs WLYB: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

NYT is the larger of the two ($10.60B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (20.37x forward earnings, beta 0.93). WLYB is the smaller challenger ($2.65B): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

NYT vs WLYB: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricNYTWLYBWhat it tells you
Market cap$10.60B$2.65BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Trailing P/E28.1012.56Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.930.77Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range34% of range87% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book5.273.13How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Before you buy: how NYT and WLYB affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. NYT and WLYB share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined NYT and WLYB exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does The New York Times Company (NYT) do?

The New York Times Company publishes The New York Times and operates a family of subscription products around it: the core news report, Games (Wordle, Connections, the Crossword), NYT Cooking, the sports site The Athletic, the product-recommendation site Wirecutter, and a growing audio and video slate. Almost all of the money comes from consumers rather than distributors: subscription revenue was about $481 million of the roughly $763 million the company took in during the quarter ended June 30, 2026, with digital-only subscriptions alone at about $408 million. Advertising (about $134 million in the quarter, now majority digital) and affiliate, licensing and other revenue (about $76 million, including Wirecutter referral fees and AI content licensing) fill in the rest. Print still exists and still declines, but it is a shrinking tail on a digital business.

Full NYT guide

What does John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Class B) (WLYB) do?

John Wiley & Sons has carried two classes of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for decades. WLY is Class A, with ~42.0 million shares outstanding as of the May 31, 2026 record date. WLYB is Class B, with ~8.76 million. The rights differ in exactly one dimension, which is voting. On ordinary business put to shareholders, a Class A share carries one-tenth of a vote and a Class B share carries a full one. Director elections work on a separate mechanism: the two classes vote as distinct constituencies, and at the September 24, 2026 annual meeting Class A holders elect three of the nine nominees while Class B holders elect the other six. Everything economic is the same. One dividend rate is declared on both lines, both share in earnings and in liquidation on the same per-share basis, and Class B converts one-for-one into Class A whenever a holder asks, a right that does not run in reverse.

Full WLYB guide

NYT vs WLYB: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • NYT drivers: The bundle and subscriber compounding; Digital advertising built on first-party data.
  • WLYB drivers: A float near 630,000 shares sets the price behaviour; One-way conversion is what tethers the two lines.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most immediate risk is cost discipline: adjusted operating costs rose about 10% year over year in the June 2026 quarter against guidance of 8% to 9%, and free cash flow margin dropped to roughly 1.3% from 15.1%, which is what actually triggered the roughly 15% single-day fall in early August 2026. For WLYB, illiquidity is the risk most likely to actually be felt: an exit from WLYB can take days at prices the tape does not advertise, and in a fast market the Class B line can lag Class A simply because nobody is quoting it.

NYT or WLYB: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick NYT if you believe its drivers more; WLYB if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the NYT and WLYB guides.

NYT vs WLYB: the full fundamentals

NYT. Figures are approximate and tied to August 2026; check live data before acting on any of them. At roughly $63.80 the stock carries a trailing price-to-earnings ratio in the high twenties on ~$382 million of trailing net income, which is a growth multiple applied to a business the market now expects to grow revenue closer to 7% than 11%. The clearest way to read the valuation is as a bet on whether the reinvestment cycle in video, audio and AI distribution converts back into free cash flow, because the June 2026 quarter showed margin expansion at the adjusted-operating line and a collapse at the cash-flow line at the same time.

WLYB. Because the economics are identical, the valuation argument on WLYB is the valuation argument on Wiley, plus or minus whatever the market charges for the smaller line on the day. The 52-week range of roughly ~$29 to ~$56 is a wide band for a company whose revenue barely moved, and the Class B prints inside it rest on far fewer trades than the Class A prints, so the B chart is noisier than the underlying business. One practical consequence is that the resting bid-ask on WLYB is often wider than the entire price spread between the two share classes.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): NYT shows revenue (ttm) ~$2.90 billion, with the June 2026 quarter at ~$762.5 million, up ~11.2% year over year, net income (ttm) ~$382 million; June 2026 quarter adjusted EPS ~$0.69 versus ~$0.58 a year earlier, subscribers ~12.8 million digital-only (~13.35 million total) after ~280,000 net digital adds; digital ARPU ~$9.94, profitability Adjusted operating profit margin ~20.4% in the June 2026 quarter, up ~90 basis points; full-year 2025 adjusted operating profit ~$550 million; WLYB shows class b shares outstanding ~8.76 million, against ~42.0 million Class A (May 31, 2026 record date), held by the wiley family llc 8,125,536 shares, ~92.8% of the class, leaving a public float near ~630,000, voting power the family controls ~62.7% of total votes, and six of the nine director seats, class b price and 20-day volume ~$52 to ~$53 on ~3,500 shares a day, versus ~$54 on ~399,000 for Class A.

The bottom line: NYT vs WLYB

NYT and WLYB are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined NYT and WLYB exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how NYT or WLYB fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in The New York Times Company with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how NYT fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between NYT and WLYB?

+

The New York Times Company publishes The New York Times and operates a family of subscription products around it: the core news report, Games (Wordle, Connections, the Crossword), NYT Cooking, the sports site The Athletic, the product-recommendation site Wirecutter, and a growing audio and video slate. John Wiley & Sons has carried two classes of common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for decades. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is NYT or WLYB the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. NYT is the larger incumbent; WLYB is the smaller challenger. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, NYT or WLYB?

+

A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both NYT and WLYB?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of NYT vs WLYB?

+

NYT: The most immediate risk is cost discipline: adjusted operating costs rose about 10% year over year in the June 2026 quarter against guidance of 8% to 9%, and free cash flow margin dropped to roughly 1.3% from 15.1%, which is what actually triggered the roughly 15% single-day fall in early August 2026. Growth is decelerating from here, with third-quarter digital subscription revenue guided to 12% to 15% and consensus revenue growth for the next twelve months near 7.3%, so a business priced for compounding now has to defend a slower number. AI-generated answers and chat interfaces sit between the Times and its readers, and while licensing deals like the Amazon agreement monetize that shift, the search and social referral channels that once fed the funnel keep shrinking. Advertising remains cyclical and would be an early casualty of a consumer or ad-market downturn, while print revenue and print advertising continue to decline structurally. Finally, the dual-class structure keeps voting control with the Ochs-Sulzberger family through Class B shares, so outside shareholders have limited influence on strategy, and editorial and political controversy is a reputational variable that can affect both subscriber churn and advertiser appetite in a way that does not show up in a spreadsheet until it does. WLYB: Illiquidity is the risk most likely to actually be felt: an exit from WLYB can take days at prices the tape does not advertise, and in a fast market the Class B line can lag Class A simply because nobody is quoting it. The dual-class structure has no sunset provision, and both ISS and Glass Lewis recommended withholding votes from a Class A nominee at the 2025 annual meeting over exactly that, so the governance discount applied to the company is a standing feature rather than a passing one. Index funds tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 hold WLY and not WLYB, which removes a source of continuous price-insensitive demand and leaves the B line dependent on individual buyers found one at a time. Data providers add their own confusion by reporting the combined ~50.8 million share count, ~$2.7 billion market capitalization and ~84% institutional ownership against the WLYB ticker, so a stock screen will suggest the class is far more widely held than it is. Every business risk carried by Class A then applies unchanged: the same ~7% decline in Learning, the same dependence on lumpy negotiated AI licensing deals, the same integration work on Emerald, and the same currency exposure on roughly half of revenue.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell NYT or WLYB; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    NYT vs WLYB: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App