QXO vs SITE: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
QXO is the larger of the two ($13.80B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (18.27x forward earnings, beta 2.20). SITE is the smaller challenger ($4.12B), priced similarly on forward earnings (18.36x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
QXO vs SITE: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | QXO | SITE | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $13.80B | $4.12B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 18.27 | 18.36 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Beta | 2.20 | 1.34 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 1% of range | 6% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 1.04 | 2.45 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Before you buy: how QXO and SITE affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. QXO and SITE share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined QXO and SITE exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does QXO (QXO) do?
QXO, Inc. is a distributor of building products, meaning it buys roofing, waterproofing, insulation, lumber-related materials and other construction supplies in bulk and sells them through a branch network to contractors, builders and trade professionals. Like most distribution businesses, it makes money on the spread between purchase and sale prices, on logistics and on the convenience and credit it extends to a fragmented base of customers who need many products delivered reliably. Its 2025 acquisition of Beacon Roofing Supply made it the largest publicly traded distributor of roofing and complementary products in the United States, and management is layering technology, pricing tools and operational discipline on top of that scale.
What does SiteOne Landscape Supply (SITE) do?
SiteOne Landscape Supply is the largest and only national full-product-line wholesale distributor of landscape supplies in the United States, serving professional landscapers, irrigation contractors, and maintenance crews rather than do-it-yourself homeowners. It sells irrigation gear, fertilizer, seed and control products, nursery stock, hardscapes, outdoor lighting, drainage, and other supplies through a dense network of roughly ~690 branches carrying about ~170,000 SKUs. The model pairs local inventory and technical service with centralized buying and pricing, which is meant to drive same-store sales and steadily wider gross margins as the company gains scale in a fragmented market it estimates at about ~$25 billion, where it holds roughly ~18% share.
QXO vs SITE: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- QXO drivers: The Beacon platform and scale; Acquisitive consolidation of a fragmented market.
- SITE drivers: Acquisition-driven consolidation; Gross margin and pricing initiatives.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: QXO is an early roll-up, so the risks are concentrated and real. For SITE, the central risk is end-market cyclicality: SiteOne's sales depend on construction and landscaping activity that softens when interest rates are high or housing slows, as the roughly ~1% organic daily sales decline in the first quarter of 2026 illustrated.
QXO or SITE: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick QXO if you believe its drivers more; SITE if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the QXO and SITE guides.
QXO vs SITE: the full fundamentals
QXO. Reading an early roll-up is different from reading a mature distributor. Reported revenue jumps as acquisitions close, so pro-forma or full-year figures that include a deal for only part of the year understate the run-rate, and management often points to combined-company revenue and adjusted EBITDA that assume pending deals are done. GAAP results can show losses from deal, financing and integration costs even when the underlying operations generate positive adjusted EBITDA, so it helps to watch adjusted EBITDA, leverage relative to that EBITDA, and how each deal is funded between cash, debt and stock. The stock typically trades at a premium to the assets it owns because investors are paying for the platform and the expectation of future dealmaking, which makes execution and the pace of accretive acquisitions the things that matter most.
SITE. Figures are approximate and tied to the asOf date; verify live numbers before acting. SiteOne trades at a premium distribution multiple (a trailing P/E in the low ~30s and no dividend), which reflects its category leadership and roll-up growth but also prices in continued margin gains and acquisitions. Because the first quarter is seasonally a loss for a landscaping distributor, full-year figures and adjusted EBITDA are more meaningful gauges of the business than any single quarter.
Headline figures (approximate, FY2025 results and latest quarter): QXO shows net sales (fy2025) About $6.84 billion (Beacon from late April 2025), adjusted ebitda (fy2025) About $647.8 million, a 9.5% margin, gaap loss per share (fy2025) About $(0.63); adjusted diluted EPS about $0.34, total debt (dec 31, 2025) About $3.10 billion ($2.25B notes plus $850M term loan); SITE shows revenue (ttm) ~$4.7 billion (FY2025 net sales up ~4%), q1 2026 net sales ~$940 million (roughly flat year over year), q1 2026 net loss ~$27 million (a seasonal first-quarter loss, EPS ~-$0.60), fy2025 net income ~$152 million (up ~23% year over year).
The bottom line: QXO vs SITE
QXO and SITE are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined QXO and SITE exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how QXO or SITE fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in QXO with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how QXO fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between QXO and SITE?
+
QXO, Inc. SiteOne Landscape Supply is the largest and only national full-product-line wholesale distributor of landscape supplies in the United States, serving professional landscapers, irrigation contractors, and maintenance crews rather than do-it-yourself homeowners. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is QXO or SITE the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. QXO is the larger incumbent; SITE is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, QXO or SITE?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), QXO trades at 18.27x and SITE at 18.36x, so QXO is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both QXO and SITE?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of QXO vs SITE?
+
QXO: QXO is an early roll-up, so the risks are concentrated and real. Each acquisition carries integration risk, and stitching many distributors onto common systems while delivering promised synergies is operationally hard. The deal pace is funded with a mix of debt and equity, which adds leverage and dilutes existing shareholders, and rising rates raise the cost of that capital. The underlying business is tied to construction, repair-and-remodel and housing activity, all of which are cyclical and can fall sharply in a downturn. Execution is everything in a consolidation strategy, and a single poorly integrated or overpriced deal can hurt. Finally, expectations are lofty: the stock prices in years of successful dealmaking and a repeat of Jacobs's past success, so any stumble or slowdown in M&A can weigh heavily on the shares. SITE: The central risk is end-market cyclicality: SiteOne's sales depend on construction and landscaping activity that softens when interest rates are high or housing slows, as the roughly ~1% organic daily sales decline in the first quarter of 2026 illustrated. Weather is a real swing factor because a wet spring or drought can shift demand across quarters, and the first quarter is structurally a seasonal loss. Commodity-linked categories such as PVC pipe, fertilizer, and grass seed introduce price deflation risk that can pressure sales dollars even when volumes hold. The acquisition strategy adds integration and overpayment risk, and competition is intensifying now that Heritage Landscape Supply Group, owned by SRS Distribution and ultimately by The Home Depot, is a well-funded number-two consolidator. Finally, a full valuation (a trailing P/E in the low ~30s with no dividend) leaves little room for disappointment if margin or acquisition execution stumbles.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell QXO or SITE; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.