Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) Stock Price & How to Invest
Last updated July 2026
Short answer
Heidmar Maritime Holdings (Nasdaq: HMR) is a Greece-based commercial and pool manager for crude and product tankers, meaning it markets, charters and operates other owners' ships for fees and voyage spreads rather than owning a fleet of its own. It is a genuine operating business with roughly $68M of trailing revenue against a roughly $71M market cap, but it is also a controlled micro cap with a very thin public float, heavy customer concentration and only fifteen months of listed history, so the operating story and the ownership structure have to be read together.
HMR stock price
As of 2026-08-06, Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) last closed at $1.20, down 23.9% over the past year. Over the past 52 weeks it has traded between $0.7680 and $1.63.
Prices are daily closing prices from Yahoo Finance and may be delayed. For the live quote, check your broker or Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.'s investor relations page. Walnut is informational, not investment advice.
What does Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) do?
Heidmar is a commercial manager and pool operator for tankers. The operating business traces back to 1984 and runs branded vessel pools including Seawolf (VLCC), Blue Fin (Suezmax), Sigma (Aframax and LR2), Star Tankers (Panamax and LR1) and Dorado (MR product tankers). Shipowners place vessels into these pools, Heidmar markets the combined tonnage to charterers, and pool earnings flow back to participants while Heidmar collects commissions and management fees. On top of that fee business it charters in vessels itself and re-employs them on spot voyages and time charters to capture the spread, provides technical management and crewing, and sells eFleetWatch, a digital tool for tracking and managing vessels. As of April 2026 it reported roughly 50 vessels under commercial management representing about 6.5 million dwt, and the July 2026 acquisition of Dutch ship manager Q-Shipping B.V. added about 16 vessels under technical management plus footholds in the Netherlands, Turkey and a crewing base in Ukraine. The holding company was incorporated in May 2024 and is headquartered in Piraeus, Greece.
The listing history matters for reading the financials. Heidmar did not IPO. It reached Nasdaq through a business combination with MGO Global Inc., a small apparel and brand-licensing shell, with the combined company beginning to trade under HMR on the Nasdaq Capital Market on February 20, 2025. That inheritance is most of why fiscal 2025 looks so ugly: revenue nearly doubled to roughly $55.9M from roughly $28.9M, yet the company posted a roughly $22.6M net loss, of which roughly $13.6M came from discontinued operations tied to disposing of the inherited Americana Liberty business, including roughly $11.1M of goodwill impairment. Strip that out and the continuing-operations loss was roughly $8.6M, itself weighed down by one-time listing costs, roughly $5.0M of stock-based compensation amortization and roughly $3.9M of earn-out charges. The first quarter of 2026 was the first clean quarter: roughly $18.4M of revenue against roughly $5.8M a year earlier, roughly $2.8M of net income (about $0.05 per basic share), roughly $6.6M of operating cash flow, and general and administrative expense down to roughly $3.6M from roughly $6.1M. The investment picture is a services platform scaling into an unusually strong tanker freight cycle at roughly one times sales, with the caveat that most of the revenue growth is low-margin chartered-in gross revenue rather than high-margin fee income, and with governance and liquidity characteristics unlike a normal listed shipping company.
What's driving Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR)?
1. A tanker cycle stretched by sanctions and longer voyages
Crude tanker economics are set by tonne-miles, not barrels, and sanctions on Russian and Venezuelan crude have rerouted flows onto much longer voyages, which absorbs vessel supply without adding a single ship. VLCC and Suezmax rates finished 2025 more than 60% above their ten-year averages, with VLCC spot earnings peaking above $100,000 per day, before easing from those November highs into early 2026. Heidmar does not own the ships that earn those rates, but pool commissions scale with pool earnings and its charter-in positions capture the spread, so a firm rate environment feeds both revenue lines at once.
2. Asset-light fleet growth is the actual growth engine
Heidmar adds revenue by adding vessels under management rather than by buying them, which is why the managed fleet moved from roughly 40 vessels at the end of 2025 to roughly 50 under commercial management by April 2026, including VLCCs, Suezmaxes, MRs and newbuildings. The July 2026 purchase of Q-Shipping B.V. cost roughly $0.2M of cash and brought nine vessels plus a technical management and crewing capability the company did not previously own at scale. Management has described this explicitly as capital-efficient building, and it is the clearest lever the company controls independent of freight rates.
3. A reset cost base creating real operating leverage
The 2025 loss was inflated by listing expenses, stock compensation amortization and earn-out charges that do not recur at the same magnitude. General and administrative expense fell to roughly $3.6M in the first quarter of 2026 from roughly $6.1M a year earlier, and that single line is most of the swing from a roughly $6.0M year-earlier quarterly loss to roughly $2.8M of net income. Because commissions and management fees carry very little incremental cost, additional pooled tonnage drops through at high margin once the fixed shore-side base is covered.
4. Service diversification beyond crude tanker pooling
The managed fleet now spans tankers and bulk carriers, technical management sits alongside commercial management, and eFleetWatch gives the company a software surface aimed at agents, brokers and operators. Heidmar also tested container shipping, agreeing in July 2025 to acquire the 1,702 TEU feeder C/V A. Obelix for roughly $25.25M from a related party, then mutually terminating the deal in January 2026 with the roughly $2.5M deposit returned. That episode cuts both ways: it kept the balance sheet asset-light, and it shows how quickly announced strategy can reverse at this size.
What are the risks to Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR)?
The concentration here is severe on every axis at once. Two related shareholders, Rhea Marine Ltd. and Maistros Shipinvest Corp., each hold roughly 26.2 million of roughly 59.0 million shares outstanding, so Heidmar qualifies as a controlled company under Nasdaq rules and is exempt from several governance requirements, leaving public holders with a float in the single-digit millions of shares, wide spreads, air pockets on any size order, and effectively no influence over outcomes. Customer concentration is just as tight: the top three customers each accounted for between 12% and 16% of revenue and together produced roughly 43% of fiscal 2025 revenue (about $23.8M), while Capital Maritime alone supplied 25 of the 49 managed vessels and roughly 37% of pool revenue and is owned by the father of the indirect owner of Maistros Shipinvest, so the largest counterparty and the control block are family-connected rather than arm's length. Dilution risk is live even though the draw has been small: the June 2025 $20M purchase agreement with B. Riley Principal Capital II lets the company sell shares at its discretion, and a resale prospectus covers up to 11,080,332 shares, which near a dollar would be meaningfully dilutive against a 59 million share count. The stock received a Nasdaq minimum bid price deficiency notice on April 24, 2026 and regained compliance on June 2, 2026 without a reverse split, but it has traded between roughly $0.73 and $1.71 over the past year and could revisit that threshold if the freight cycle turns. There has also been no permanent chief financial officer since Niki Fotiou departed on May 31, 2026, with the chief executive overseeing finance during the search, an added reporting-quality risk at a company carrying only about $14.2M of shareholders' equity whose profitability depends on a spot market that fell 43% to 55% on key VLCC routes between November 2025 and January 2026.
Is HMR a buy or a sell?
We give no verdict on Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.. Both cases are real, which is why the question is contested at all, so here is the strongest version of each.
The case for buying. A tanker cycle stretched by sanctions and longer voyages. Crude tanker economics are set by tonne-miles, not barrels, and sanctions on Russian and Venezuelan crude have rerouted flows onto much longer voyages, which absorbs vessel supply without adding a single ship.
The case against. The concentration here is severe on every axis at once.
Read the full bull and bear case on HMR, including what would have to change to break either one. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
How is Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR) valued? (approximate, August 2026)
A simple financial snapshot. These are approximations and refresh quarterly; for current figures see Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.'s investor relations page or your broker.
- Revenue (TTM): ~$68M
- Q1 2026 revenue: ~$18.4M, up from ~$5.8M a year earlier
- Q1 2026 net income: ~$2.8M (~$0.05 per basic share)
- FY2025 net loss: ~$22.6M total, ~$8.6M from continuing operations
- Cash and equivalents: ~$27.6M at March 31, 2026
- Shareholders' equity: ~$14.2M against a ~$71M market cap
The headline that revenue (~$68M trailing) sits close to market cap (~$71M) is real but needs unpacking, because the two revenue lines are not economically alike. In the first quarter of 2026, trade revenues (commissions and management fees, the high-margin asset-light core) were roughly $5.7M, while voyage and time charter revenues were roughly $12.7M against roughly $11.2M of operating lease and charter-in costs, so the larger line is gross revenue on chartered-in tonnage that converts to only a thin spread. Across full-year 2025 the same split was roughly $12.3M of trade revenue against roughly $43.5M of voyage and time charter revenue, and adjusted EBITDA for the whole year was essentially breakeven at roughly $51,000 before the first quarter of 2026 delivered roughly $3.3M of adjusted EBITDA on its own.
Who competes with Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR)?
Commercial managers, pool operators and ship managers
Heidmar's direct competition is for shipowners' mandates, not for cargo. Signal Maritime (which has also partnered with Heidmar on an Aframax pool), Navig8, Teekay Tankers' Taurus pool and the commercial pools run by Scorpio Tankers all compete to aggregate third-party tonnage, and large owners frequently choose to keep commercial management in house instead. On the technical management and crewing side, which Heidmar expanded via Q-Shipping, the incumbents are far larger: V.Ships, Anglo-Eastern, Columbia Shipmanagement, Bernhard Schulte and Synergy Marine each manage hundreds of vessels. Scale matters in this business because a bigger pool books better voyage combinations, so Heidmar's roughly 50 commercially managed vessels sit well below the largest platforms.
Listed tanker owners (the other way to hold the same cycle)
Anyone drawn to HMR because of tanker rates is implicitly choosing a services proxy over direct vessel ownership. Frontline (FRO), DHT Holdings (DHT), International Seaways (INSW), Teekay Tankers (TNK), Tsakos Energy Navigation (TEN), Nordic American Tankers (NAT), Scorpio Tankers (STNG) and Torm (TRMD) own the ships, carry the debt and depreciation, capture the full day rate rather than a commission, and several pay substantial dividends out of the same cycle. They are far more liquid and far more heavily covered, and their earnings swing harder in both directions than a fee-and-spread manager's.
Micro-cap Nasdaq shipping names with concentrated sponsors
For float, governance and trading-behaviour comparison rather than business overlap, HMR sits in a recognisable cohort of small Greek-sponsored Nasdaq shipping issuers: Toro Corp (TORO), Castor Maritime (CTRM), Imperial Petroleum (IMPP), C3is (CISS), Performance Shipping (PSHG), Globus Maritime (GLBS), Pyxis Tankers (PXS) and OceanPal (OP). These names share controlled ownership, related-party fleet and management arrangements, shallow volume and recurring minimum-bid-price issues. HMR differs in being a fee-based services operator rather than a vessel owner, and in having so far cured its bid-price deficiency without a reverse split, but the structural comparison is the honest one.
What stocks are similar to Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR)?
Other names that sit close to HMR: same theme, named as a direct competitor, or held beside it in the same funds. Each entry says which. Worth a look if you are thinking about diversification within a thesis rather than concentration on one ticker.
How to invest in Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR)
There are three common ways to get HMR exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) directly at any major broker. Hold an ETF that includes it, which spreads the position across many companies. Or build it into a focused thematic portfolio, so HMR sits alongside other stocks that express the same thesis.
Walnut takes the portfolio route. Describe a thesis where HMR fits (for example “AI infrastructure” or “dividend-growth large-caps”) and the AI proposes 5 to 6 constituents with target weights. You review the plan and fund it through your own broker when you're ready.
New to this? Start with how to invest in stocks, see how to analyze a stock with AI, or compare the best AI stock analyzers.
The bottom line on Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR)
HMR is an asset-light tanker services operator that finally turned profitable in early 2026 on a strong freight cycle, wrapped inside a micro-cap structure where two related shareholders hold almost the entire company and three customers supply almost half the revenue.
More on Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. (HMR)
Whether HMR is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, what would have to go right, and the risks in is HMR a buy or a sell?, and where the stock could go from here in the HMR stock forecast.
For income investors, whether HMR pays a dividend and how the payout looks is covered in does HMR pay a dividend? And to weigh HMR against a peer, read the full side-by-side comparisons: HMR vs TNK and HMR vs STNG.
Wondering how HMR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp. with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how HMR fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What does Heidmar Maritime Holdings actually do?
+
It commercially manages other companies' ships. Shipowners enter tankers into Heidmar's branded pools (Seawolf for VLCCs, Blue Fin for Suezmaxes, Sigma for Aframax and LR2, Star Tankers for Panamax and LR1, Dorado for MR product tankers), and Heidmar markets that combined tonnage to charterers, allocates voyages, and collects commissions and management fees while pool earnings flow back to participants. It also charters in vessels itself for spot and time charter employment, provides technical management and crewing, assists with vessel sale and purchase, and sells the eFleetWatch platform. As of April 2026 it reported roughly 50 vessels under commercial management, about 6.5 million dwt.
How did HMR get listed, and why does the listing history matter?
+
Heidmar did not run a traditional IPO. It combined with MGO Global Inc., a small listed apparel and brand-licensing company, and began trading as HMR on the Nasdaq Capital Market on February 20, 2025. That route explains most of the 2025 loss: Heidmar inherited MGO's Americana Liberty business, disposed of it, and booked roughly $13.6M of discontinued-operations losses including roughly $11.1M of goodwill impairment, on top of one-time listing costs, roughly $5.0M of stock compensation amortization and roughly $3.9M of earn-out charges. Reading the 2025 income statement without separating those items misstates how the underlying shipping-services business performed.
Is HMR profitable?
+
It was in its most recently reported quarter, and was not for the prior full year. For the quarter ended March 31, 2026 Heidmar reported roughly $18.4M of revenue, roughly $2.8M of net income (roughly $0.05 per basic share), roughly $3.4M of adjusted net income, and roughly $6.6M of operating cash flow. For full-year 2025 it reported a roughly $22.6M net loss on roughly $55.9M of revenue, of which roughly $8.6M came from continuing operations, with full-year adjusted EBITDA roughly breakeven at about $51,000. On a trailing twelve-month basis the company is still loss-making at roughly negative $13.7M, because the heavy 2025 charges remain inside the window.
Revenue is almost as large as the market cap. Does that make it cheap?
+
It confirms a real operating business rather than a promotional shell, which is a meaningful signal, but the roughly one-times-sales optic overstates the case because the two revenue lines carry very different economics. In the first quarter of 2026 trade revenues (commissions and management fees) were roughly $5.7M, while voyage and time charter revenues were roughly $12.7M against roughly $11.2M of operating lease and charter-in costs. The larger line is gross revenue on chartered-in tonnage that converts to only a thin spread, so revenue grew roughly 217% year over year while net income was roughly $2.8M. Margin and fee-revenue mix are far more informative here than a price-to-sales multiple.
How concentrated is the customer base?
+
Very. In fiscal 2025 the top three customers each represented between 12% and 16% of revenue and together accounted for roughly 43% of total operating revenue, about $23.8M. The largest relationship is Capital Maritime, which supplied 25 of the 49 vessels Heidmar managed and roughly 37% of pool revenue during 2025. Capital Maritime is owned by the father of the indirect owner of Maistros Shipinvest Corp., one of the two controlling shareholders, so the biggest counterparty is family-connected to the control block rather than arm's length. If that relationship changed, a large share of managed tonnage and pool revenue would move at once.
Has HMR faced delisting risk, a reverse split, or toxic financing?
+
Heidmar received a Nasdaq deficiency notice on April 24, 2026 under continued listing rule 5550(a)(2) for failing the $1.00 minimum bid price, and regained compliance on June 2, 2026 after the closing bid held at or above $1.00 for ten consecutive business days, notably without a reverse split. On financing, a $20M purchase agreement with B. Riley Principal Capital II signed in June 2025 lets the company sell shares at its discretion, but usage has been small: 215,272 shares across all of 2025 at a gross average of roughly $1.26 for roughly $271,000 net, and 260,628 shares in the first quarter of 2026 at roughly $1.27. A resale prospectus covering up to 11,080,332 shares exists, so the capacity for dilution is real even though the draw has not been.
What would someone track from here?
+
The mix between trade revenue (commissions and fees) and voyage and time charter revenue, because a rising fee share means the asset-light platform is scaling rather than the company simply running more low-margin chartered-in tonnage. Vessel count under commercial and technical management, the growth lever the company controls regardless of freight rates. Whether adjusted EBITDA stays positive through a softer rate quarter, given VLCC rates on key Persian Gulf routes fell 43% to 55% between November 2025 and January 2026. The appointment of a permanent chief financial officer, vacant since May 31, 2026. Draws on the B. Riley facility, the $1.00 bid price threshold, and the Capital Maritime relationship. Second quarter 2026 results were scheduled for August 17, 2026. Walnut is not an investment adviser and none of this is a recommendation.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Financial figures on this page are approximations; always verify current numbers with Heidmar Maritime Holdings Corp.'s investor relations page or your broker before making investment decisions.