Facet vs Interactive Brokers: Which Is Better in 2026?

Last updated November 2026

Short answer

Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing); Interactive Brokers is a brokerage API for people building their own AI agent. Best for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP: Facet ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). Best for advanced and international investors: Interactive Brokers (brokerage fees). Best for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, with the trades you approve placed for you: Walnut, an AI investing app (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets).

Both Facet and Interactive Brokers get grouped under “AI investing tools,” which is why people compare them. Below is what each one does, whether it reads the brokerage you already use, how each is priced, and who each fits, checked in October 2026. Walnut, which publishes this page, is an AI investing app and is noted where it fits.

Facet vs Interactive Brokers at a glance

 FacetInteractive Brokers
CategoryHands-off automated investing (robo-advisors)For builders: connect a broker to an AI agent
What the AI doesNone; this is human planningAI-integration options (community MCP)
Connects your brokerNo (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest)IBKR accounts
Read vs tradeAdvisor-managedRead + trade
Cost$2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)Brokerage fees
Best forFlat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFPAdvanced and international investors
One limitationThe flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.Powerful but complex; AI connectors are mostly community-built.

Prices checked October 2026. A price marked (Oct 2026) was read on the vendor's own pricing page; others are described without a number because we could not verify one.

What is Facet?

Flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP professional, priced by complexity.

How it works: You pay an annual membership and are assigned a CFP professional who covers planning across tax, insurance, estate coordination and retirement, with investment management available inside it. Because the fee is flat and set by complexity, it does not rise as your portfolio grows, and that is its main argument against the percentage model.

In practice, Facet’s AI none; this is human planning. It is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing), best suited to flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. On connecting an account: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest). On execution: advisor-managed. Cost: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026).

One real limitation: The flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.

What is Interactive Brokers?

Broad market access with AI-integration options and community-built MCP connectors. Best for advanced and international investors.

How it works: Interactive Brokers gives you broad global market access through professional platforms (like Trader Workstation) and a deep API. AI integration is possible by wiring tools to that API or using community-built MCP connectors, but there is no polished, official consumer AI assistant, so the AI layer is something you or a developer assemble.

In practice, Interactive Brokers’s AI AI-integration options (community MCP). It is a brokerage API for people building their own AI agent, best suited to advanced and international investors. On connecting an account: IBKR accounts. On execution: read + trade. Cost: brokerage fees.

One real limitation: Powerful but complex; AI connectors are mostly community-built.

Facet vs Interactive Brokers: how they actually differ

Category comes first. Facet focuses on flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP (none; this is human planning), and Interactive Brokers on advanced and international investors (AI-integration options (community MCP)). On broker connection they differ too: Facet is “No (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest)” versus Interactive Brokers at “IBKR accounts”. That shapes everything downstream: how personal the answers are, where trades settle, and how much control you keep over individual positions.

Facet vs Interactive Brokers: strengths and trade-offs

Every tool gives something up for what it does well. Below is the give-and-take on each, so you can weigh the specific strengths against the limitations that come with them, beyond the headline category.

Facet

Where it is strong

  • A flat fee that does not grow with your balance, which removes the incentive against advice that shrinks it
  • A dedicated CFP professional of your own; there is no call centre or questionnaire
  • Planning breadth beyond investing, including tax and insurance coordination

What to watch out for

  • In absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper
  • Pricing tiers by complexity, so confirm which tier your situation lands in before comparing

Interactive Brokers

Where it is strong

  • Vast global market and asset-class access under one account
  • Low margin rates and professional-grade trading tools
  • A deep, well-documented API for programmatic access

What to watch out for

  • Powerful but genuinely complex and intimidating for beginners
  • AI connectors are mostly community-built and unofficial, not a supported product

The key divider: does it read your real holdings?

For AI investing tools, the distinction that matters most is whether the tool works from your actual, connected positions or reasons from something else: a separate account it manages for you, or the tickers and numbers you feed it. It decides how personal the answers can be, and where your money physically lives.

  • Facet: manages a separate account it holds. Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet.
  • Interactive Brokers: connects specific supported accounts. Interactive Brokers connects a defined set of accounts (IBKR accounts), so whether it can see your holdings depends on whether your money is at one of them.

This is where they diverge most. One works from your real, connected account while the other does not, so if you want an assistant grounded in the exact positions you already hold, that gap is the thing to weigh first. This holdings-aware angle is the one Walnut is built around: it connects the brokerage you already use and reasons from your live positions, read-only by default, with any trades left for you to approve.

Facet vs Interactive Brokers: which should you choose?

Each one wins a different job, so the answer depends on which job you need done.

  • Choose Facet if you want flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP. Its AI none; this is human planning, and it costs $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). It is built for someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. Keep in mind: the flat fee is large in absolute terms at small balances, so it only beats a percentage once you have enough assets or enough complexity.
  • Choose Interactive Brokers if you want advanced and international investors. Its AI AI-integration options (community MCP), and it costs brokerage fees. It is built for advanced or international investors who want breadth and are comfortable with complex tools. Keep in mind: powerful but complex; AI connectors are mostly community-built.
  • Choose Walnut if you want a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve. It is an AI investing app that connects the broker you already use, and it costs free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets.

Because they sit in different categories, this is not strictly either-or: some investors use one for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP and the other for advanced and international investors, and watch for overlapping costs.

Facet vs Interactive Brokers: pricing and cost model

Cost is easy to misread when two tools charge in different shapes, so compare the model, not just the number. Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). Interactive Brokers: brokerage fees. A percentage-of-assets fee scales with your balance, a flat subscription does not, and a “free” tier usually earns elsewhere (on cash, order flow, or premium upgrades), so the cheapest headline is not always the cheapest outcome for your situation.

Prices checked October 2026. Pricing and tiers change, so confirm the current numbers on each provider’s own site before you decide.

Where Walnut fits

Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, flags any position above a quarter of the portfolio, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT. See Walnut vs Facet and Walnut vs Interactive Brokers.

Try Walnut on top of your broker

Free. Connect the broker you already use, and ask anything about what you own.

FAQ

Is Facet or Interactive Brokers better?

+

Facet is better for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP ($2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026)). Interactive Brokers is better for advanced and international investors (brokerage fees). Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing) and Interactive Brokers is a brokerage API for people building their own AI agent, so the right pick is the one whose job you want done.

What is the difference between Facet and Interactive Brokers?

+

Facet is a robo-advisor (hands-off automated investing): it none; this is human planning. Interactive Brokers is a brokerage API for people building their own AI agent: it AI-integration options (community MCP). Facet suits flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP; Interactive Brokers suits advanced and international investors.

Is Facet or Interactive Brokers better for beginners?

+

Facet is the more beginner-friendly of the two (flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP). The other is better once you know what you want from it. Neither replaces understanding what you own.

Does Facet connect to my brokerage?

+

Facet: no (manages assets it custodies, planning covers the rest) (manages a separate account it holds). Interactive Brokers: IBKR accounts (connects specific supported accounts). If keeping your current broker matters, that distinction is often the deciding factor.

Does Facet see my real holdings?

+

Facet does not read the brokerage you already use. It opens and holds a new account, then invests the money you move into it, so its view is limited to what sits inside Facet. By contrast, Interactive Brokers connects specific supported accounts: Interactive Brokers connects a defined set of accounts (IBKR accounts), so whether it can see your holdings depends on whether your money is at one of them.

Facet vs Interactive Brokers: which is cheaper?

+

Facet: $2,600, $5,500 or $8,700/yr flat, no asset minimum (Oct 2026). Interactive Brokers: brokerage fees. A percentage of assets grows with your balance and a flat subscription does not, so compare in dollars at your balance. Prices marked (Oct 2026) were checked on the vendor's own site in October 2026.

Can I use Facet and Interactive Brokers together?

+

Often yes, because they do different things: one for flat-fee financial planning with a dedicated CFP and the other for advanced and international investors. Watch for overlapping subscription costs, and remember that trades settle in whatever account actually holds your money.

Who is Facet best for, and who is Interactive Brokers best for?

+

Facet best fits someone with a few hundred thousand or more, or real complexity, who wants planning more than portfolio management and objects to paying a percentage. Interactive Brokers best fits advanced or international investors who want breadth and are comfortable with complex tools. If you see yourself in one description more than the other, that is usually the clearer signal than any single feature or price.

What are the main trade-offs between Facet and Interactive Brokers?

+

With Facet, watch for this: in absolute dollars the membership is significant, so at smaller balances a percentage fee is cheaper. With Interactive Brokers: powerful but genuinely complex and intimidating for beginners. Pick the trade-off you can live with given the job you want done.

Where does Walnut fit between Facet and Interactive Brokers?

+

Walnut is an AI investing app, and it is the pick for a keep, trim or exit read on the stocks you already own, and placing the trades you approve (free; Walnut Plus $9.99/mo on the web; no fee on assets). It connects the brokerage you already use, read-only by default, gives each holding a keep, trim or exit read against the S&P 500, builds thematic baskets with target weights, and places the trades you approve. You use it through its own assistant, or inside Claude or ChatGPT.

Related comparisons

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Competitor features and pricing are point-in-time and change; verify the current details on each provider's site before deciding. Nothing here is a recommendation to use any particular product or security.