What Is VIS? Vanguard Industrials Index Fund ETF Shares

Last updated September 2026

Short answer

VIS is Vanguard Industrials Index Fund ETF Shares, an ETF that tracks a broad index of US industrial-sector companies at a 0.09% expense ratio. VIS gives broad exposure to US industrial companies for 0.09%, and its two largest bets on a single business are easy to miss. GE Aerospace at 5.2% and GE Vernova at 4.2% are both fragments of the former General Electric, and together they are 9.4% of the fund, more than Caterpillar's 6.6% top position. Industrials account for 93% of the portfolio, with the balance in technology and consumer discretionary. The fund launched in 2004, holds $9.0B and yields 0.86%. It reaches beyond the largest names into mid-sized industrial companies.

Ticker
VIS
Issuer
Vanguard
Tracks
a broad index of US industrial-sector companies
Expense ratio
0.09%
AUM
$9.0B
YTD return
See chart
Dividend yield
0.86%
Inception
2004

VIS is issued by Vanguard and tracks a broad index of US industrial-sector companies. It charges a 0.09% expense ratio, holds approximately $9.0B in assets under management, yields about 0.86%, and launched in 2004.

Stats as of August 2026. Live prices and current performance show inside Walnut once you connect a broker.

One company, two tickers, the biggest weight

General Electric's breakup left three separately listed businesses, and two of them are here. GE Aerospace at 5.2% makes and services jet engines. GE Vernova at 4.2% makes power generation and grid equipment. As holdings they are independent companies with distinct customers and cycles, but read as a single line in the portfolio they represent 9.4% of the fund, ahead of Caterpillar at 6.6%. Anyone scanning the holdings list for concentration and stopping at the top line will conclude the fund is more evenly spread than it is.

It is a good illustration of what a sector fund actually contains. The industrials label covers machinery, aerospace and defence, railroads, electrical equipment, building products, distribution and transport services. Caterpillar at 6.6%, RTX at 3.4%, Eaton at 2.2%, Boeing at 2.2%, Deere at 2.1%, Union Pacific at 1.9% and Parker Hannifin at 1.6% each answer to a different demand cycle. Construction equipment, defence budgets, data centre electrification, farm income and freight volumes do not move together.

That heterogeneity is why the sector's aggregate behaviour can be hard to reason about. A fund like this is not one bet on industrial activity. It is roughly a dozen distinct cyclical exposures bundled under one heading, currently weighted heavily toward aerospace and electrical equipment.

The rideshare company in an industrials fund

Uber sits at 1.7%, which surprises people who think of it as a technology company. Under the standard sector classification, Uber is a ground transportation business, which puts it in industrials next to the railroads. Classification decisions like this are not cosmetic: they determine which index funds must own a stock, and a reclassification can move billions of dollars of passive money between sector funds without any change in the underlying company.

The broader point is that sector funds inherit the classification system's judgements. If you buy an industrials fund expecting machinery and aerospace, you also get whatever else the classifier has placed there. Payment processors, staffing firms, waste companies and distributors all appear under industrials at various points in the sector's history.

The 5% technology weight and 1% consumer discretionary weight come from the same source: companies whose classification straddles boundaries, or index construction that allows some drift. At 93% industrials, the fund is a clean sector expression, but not a perfectly pure one.

Cost, income and when a sector fund makes sense

At 0.09%, VIS is priced as a broad index fund rather than as a specialist product, which matters because sector funds are frequently held for years rather than traded. The fund also reaches further down the market cap scale than the largest sector ETFs, taking in mid-sized industrial companies alongside the megacaps. That produces a slightly different profile from a fund restricted to S&P 500 constituents, with more exposure to smaller domestic manufacturers and distributors.

The 0.86% yield is modest. Industrial companies pay dividends, but the sector's large weights in aerospace and electrical equipment currently sit with companies that reinvest heavily or have rebuilt payouts after cuts. This is a growth-and-cycle holding rather than an income one.

The honest case against owning it is overlap. Anyone holding a total US market fund already owns every one of these companies at their market weight. A sector fund is a decision to hold more of them than the market does, which requires a view about industrial demand, defence spending or electrification that you can articulate. Without such a view, the position adds concentration without adding anything else.

VIS holdings: top 10

Approximate weights as of August 2026. Each ticker links to its individual stock guide in Walnut.

RankTickerCompany% of VIS
1CATCaterpillar Inc6.6%
2GEGE Aerospace5.2%
3GEVGE Vernova Inc4.2%
4RTXRTX Corp3.4%
5ETNEaton Corp PLC2.2%
6BABoeing Co2.2%
7DEDeere & Co2.1%
8UNPUnion Pacific Corp1.9%
9UBERUber Technologies Inc1.7%
10PHParker Hannifin Corp1.6%

How do I invest in VIS?

There are three common ways to get VIS exposure. Buy shares (or fractional shares) of VIS directly at any major broker that lists it. Hold it as a core position and layer more concentrated ideas on top. Or build it into a thematic portfolio in Walnut, so VIS sits alongside other holdings that express the same thesis, with target weights you can rebalance toward. VIS trades like a stock during market hours, so you buy it the same way you would any listed share.

New to buying funds? See how to buy an ETF, step by step.

Is VIS a good buy?

Whether VIS is a good buy depends less on any single call and more on your time horizon and what you already hold: it tracks a broad index of US industrial-sector companies, so the real question is whether you want that exposure in your mix and at what weight. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is VIS a buy?

The bottom line on VIS

VIS gives you a broad index of US industrial-sector companies exposure in one ticker at a 0.09% expense ratio. Most investors use it as a core holding and layer more concentrated thematic portfolios on top.

More on VIS

Whether VIS is worth buying today depends more on your time horizon and what you already hold than on any single call. We walk through valuation, concentration, and what would have to be true for it to outperform from here in is VIS a buy?

VIS yields 0.86% as of August 2026, paid by passing through the dividends of its underlying holdings. For the payout schedule, history, and how the distributions are taxed, see VIS dividend: yield and schedule.

New to funds like VIS? Start with what an ETF is, then how to buy an ETF, or browse the full guide to ETF investing.

Wondering how VIS fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in VIS with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how VIS fits what you actually hold: what it overlaps with, what it leaves you exposed to, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

Why are there two GE companies in the fund?

+

General Electric split into separate listed businesses, and two of them qualify as industrials. GE Aerospace at 5.2% builds and services jet engines; GE Vernova at 4.2% makes power generation and grid equipment. They are now distinct companies with different customers, but the combined 9.4% weight makes the former conglomerate the fund's largest exposure, ahead of Caterpillar at 6.6%.

Why is Uber classified as an industrial?

+

Standard sector classification treats Uber as a ground transportation company rather than a software business, which places it in industrials alongside railroads and freight operators. It holds 1.7% of the fund. Classification decisions of this kind determine which index funds are required to own a stock, so a reclassification can shift large amounts of passive money without any change at the company itself.

What does VIS actually hold?

+

US companies in machinery, aerospace and defence, electrical equipment, railroads, building products, distribution and transport. Caterpillar leads at 6.6%, followed by GE Aerospace at 5.2%, GE Vernova at 4.2%, RTX at 3.4%, Eaton at 2.2%, Boeing at 2.2%, Deere at 2.1%, Union Pacific at 1.9%, Uber at 1.7% and Parker Hannifin at 1.6%. Industrials make up 93% of the portfolio.

How does VIS differ from other industrial sector ETFs?

+

It draws on a broader US index rather than being limited to S&P 500 members, so it includes mid-sized industrial companies that the largest sector ETFs leave out. That gives it a longer holdings list and a slightly different risk profile, with more exposure to smaller domestic manufacturers and distributors. Its 0.09% fee is also low for a sector fund.

Is this a way to invest in electrification and data centres?

+

Partly. GE Vernova at 4.2% and Eaton at 2.2% both supply electrical infrastructure, and demand for grid and power equipment is closely tied to data centre construction. But those two positions are a small share of a fund whose weight sits mainly in aerospace, machinery and transport. A more direct expression would require a narrower fund or individual holdings.

Why is the yield only 0.86%?

+

The sector's largest weights currently sit with aerospace and electrical equipment companies that reinvest heavily or have rebuilt dividends after past cuts. Industrials as a group are not a high-yield sector, and the fund's income sits well below what a utilities or consumer staples fund pays. It is held for exposure to industrial demand rather than for distributions.

How cyclical is the fund?

+

Considerably, but not uniformly. Construction equipment, freight volumes, farm income, defence budgets and power infrastructure spending all follow different cycles, and the fund holds all of them. Defence in particular tends to be counter-cyclical to the rest. The aggregate is sensitive to industrial activity and capital spending, and typically falls harder than the broad market in a downturn.

Does it overlap with a total market fund?

+

Completely. Every holding is already inside a US total market or S&P 500 fund at its market weight. Buying VIS on top is a decision to hold industrials at more than the market's weighting, which is only worth doing with a specific view about industrial demand, defence spending or electrification. Without one, it concentrates the portfolio without adding new exposure.

What is VIS's expense ratio?

+

VIS has an expense ratio of 0.09% per year as of August 2026, charged by Vanguard and deducted from the fund's value rather than billed to you separately. On a $10,000 position that is roughly $9 a year. Fees compound over time, so on a long-term holding the expense ratio is one of the few return drivers you control. It is worth comparing against other funds that track a broad index of US industrial-sector companies before you choose.

How do I compare VIS to similar ETFs?

+

Put a few fields side by side: the expense ratio (fees compound over decades), the index or strategy it tracks, the top holdings and how much they overlap with what you already own, the dividend yield, and the AUM, liquidity, and bid-ask spread that affect trading costs. For index funds, tracking error (how closely it follows its index) and tax efficiency matter too. VIS's figures are above; the full method is in Walnut's guide on how to compare ETFs.

Related ETFs

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Holdings weights and fund statistics on this page are approximations stamped to August 2026; verify current figures against Vanguard's fund page or your broker before investing.