AMG vs IVZ: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated October 2026

Short answer

IVZ is the larger of the two ($12.45B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (8.67x forward earnings, beta 1.63). AMG is the smaller challenger ($9.93B), priced similarly on forward earnings (8.96x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

AMG vs IVZ: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricAMGIVZWhat it tells you
Market cap$9.93B$12.45BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E8.968.67Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Beta1.071.63Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range93% of range58% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book3.291.25How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Before you buy: how AMG and IVZ affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. AMG and IVZ share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined AMG and IVZ exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Affiliated Managers Group (AMG) do?

Affiliated Managers Group operates a multi-boutique model: instead of running money itself, it takes long-term equity stakes in independently managed investment firms across equities, fixed income, liquid alternatives, and private markets. Each affiliate keeps operational and investment autonomy while AMG shares in its management and performance fees and provides growth capital, distribution, and strategic support. As of Q1 2026 the affiliate network managed record assets under management of roughly $882 billion, with about $148 billion in private markets and $261.5 billion in liquid alternatives, and those alternative strategies now drive the majority of earnings.

Full AMG guide

What does Invesco Ltd (IVZ) do?

Invesco Ltd. is a global independent investment management firm that manages money for retail and institutional clients across equities, fixed income, alternatives, and multi-asset strategies. It distributes through mutual funds, separately managed accounts, institutional mandates, and a large ETF business, and it is best known as the sponsor of Invesco QQQ, one of the largest and most heavily traded ETFs in the world. Because it earns fees on the assets it manages, Invesco's revenue moves with two things: the level of markets (which lifts or lowers asset values) and net client flows (money coming in or leaving).

Full IVZ guide

AMG vs IVZ: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • AMG drivers: Shift toward alternatives and private markets; Record AUM and net inflows.
  • IVZ drivers: QQQ conversion unlocks new fees; Record AUM and durable inflows.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: AMG's revenue is tied to market levels and net flows, so a market drawdown or a shift back to outflows would compress fees quickly. For IVZ, the dominant risk is market sensitivity: as a fee-on-assets business, Invesco's revenue and profits fall when equity and bond markets drop, so a sustained downturn would cut AUM and earnings quickly regardless of execution.

AMG or IVZ: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick AMG if you believe its drivers more; IVZ if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the AMG and IVZ guides.

AMG vs IVZ: the full fundamentals

AMG. As of October 16, 2026, AMG trades at about 13.5x trailing and roughly 9x forward earnings, a discount typical of asset managers exposed to fee compression, even after the shares rose about 33% year to date. Q2 2026 brought revenue of ~$641 million, up about 30% year over year, and Economic EPS of $8.29 ahead of estimates. Consensus for the Q3 report on November 2, 2026 is EPS of ~$8.79 on ~$655 million of revenue, and the average analyst target is about $446.

IVZ. Figures are approximate and tied to the asOf date; verify live numbers before acting. At about $28.44 on October 16, 2026, Invesco trades near 8.8 times forward earnings and 1.3 times book with a yield near 3%, a modest multiple for an asset manager whose adjusted EPS is expected to grow about 38% in 2026; GAAP results show a trailing loss, so there is no meaningful trailing P/E. For an asset manager, AUM, flows, and fee rate matter more than a single quarter's EPS, and the Q3 report on October 27 is the first full quarter in which QQQ fee revenue can start to appear. The analyst mean target is about $34.64.

Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): AMG shows revenue (ttm) ~$2.27B, revenue growth (q2 2026, yoy) ~30%, operating margin ~30%, net income (ttm) ~$856M; IVZ shows revenue (ttm) ~$6.9 billion; latest quarter up ~20.5% YoY, adjusted eps (q2 2026) ~$0.71 vs ~$0.66 consensus, net income (ttm, gaap) ~-$309 million, operating margin (ttm) ~20% GAAP.

The bottom line: AMG vs IVZ

AMG and IVZ are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined AMG and IVZ exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how AMG or IVZ fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Affiliated Managers Group with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how AMG fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between AMG and IVZ?

+

Affiliated Managers Group operates a multi-boutique model: instead of running money itself, it takes long-term equity stakes in independently managed investment firms across equities, fixed income, liquid alternatives, and private markets. Invesco Ltd. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is AMG or IVZ the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. IVZ is the larger incumbent; AMG is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, AMG or IVZ?

+

On forward P/E (as of October 2026), AMG trades at 8.96x and IVZ at 8.67x, so IVZ is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both AMG and IVZ?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of AMG vs IVZ?

+

AMG: AMG's revenue is tied to market levels and net flows, so a market drawdown or a shift back to outflows would compress fees quickly. The secular growth of low-cost passive products pressures fee rates across the active industry, and alternatives face intense competition for both assets and quality affiliate partners. The partnership structure exposes AMG to unanticipated changes in affiliate revenue, expenses, and key-person departures that it has limited ability to control. Performance fees and a concentration of earnings in alternatives make results lumpy, and rising markets that inflate AUM can reverse just as fast; analysts expect 2027 EPS to come in below 2026. After a 65% one-year gain, the stock also carries more expectation than it did. AMG has about ~$3.2 billion of debt against ~$503 million of cash, and regulatory change and currency movements add further variability to reported results. IVZ: The dominant risk is market sensitivity: as a fee-on-assets business, Invesco's revenue and profits fall when equity and bond markets drop, so a sustained downturn would cut AUM and earnings quickly regardless of execution. Fee compression is structural, with passive and ETF price wars (Invesco itself is cutting the QQQ fee) pressuring industry margins over time. Flows can reverse: eleven quarters of inflows can turn to outflows if performance lags or sentiment shifts. Heavy reliance on a single flagship product, QQQ, concentrates risk in the Nasdaq-100 and the tech-heavy names that drive it, and QQQ also faces new ETF competition. The private-markets push adds execution and partnership-dependency risk, and the firm carries debt and prior preferred obligations that constrain flexibility in a downturn. Valuation reflects some of the good news: the stock is up about 25% over one year, and in October 2026 analysts trimmed and raised targets in both directions (Autonomous Research to $30 from $31, JPMorgan to $32 from $29.50), a sign that the QQQ upside is debated rather than assumed.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell AMG or IVZ; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.