B vs PAAS: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated October 2026
Short answer
B is the larger of the two ($67.19B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (9.49x forward earnings, beta 1.14). PAAS is the smaller challenger ($18.33B), priced similarly on forward earnings (10.15x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
B vs PAAS: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | B | PAAS | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $67.19B | $18.33B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 9.49 | 10.15 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 10.55 | 13.08 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.14 | 1.59 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 43% of range | 30% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.46 | 2.51 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Before you buy: how B and PAAS affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. B and PAAS share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined B and PAAS exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Barrick Mining Corporation (B) do?
Barrick Mining Corporation (B) is one of the world's largest gold producers and, increasingly, a major copper producer. It mines and sells gold and copper from a portfolio of large, long-life operations spread across the Americas, Africa, and the Middle East, including Nevada Gold Mines (a joint venture in the United States), Pueblo Viejo in the Dominican Republic, Kibali in the Democratic Republic of Congo, North Mara in Tanzania, and the Loulo-Gounkoto complex in Mali. The company changed its name from Barrick Gold Corporation to Barrick Mining Corporation and switched its NYSE ticker from GOLD to B in May 2025, as part of its push to grow copper alongside gold. Its growth pipeline includes the Fourmile gold project in Nevada and the large Reko Diq copper-gold project in Pakistan. As a commodity producer, Barrick's revenue and profits swing with gold and copper prices, which it does not control. Its shares also trade on the Toronto Stock Exchange under ABX. Headquartered in Toronto, Barrick is widely viewed as a large-cap way to gain exposure to gold as a store of value, with growing copper leverage to electrification.
What does Pan American Silver (PAAS) do?
Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS) is a Vancouver-based precious-metals mining company and one of the largest primary silver producers in the world, with significant gold output alongside the silver. It operates a portfolio of mines spread across the Americas, including Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, Canada, Brazil, and Chile. The company makes money by mining and selling silver and gold (plus byproducts such as zinc, lead, and copper at some operations), so its revenue and margins are driven by how many ounces it produces relative to its mining costs and the prevailing silver and gold prices. In 2025 Pan American produced roughly 22.8 million ounces of silver and about 742,000 ounces of gold and reported record annual revenue of around $3.6 billion.
B vs PAAS: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- B drivers: Large-cap gold exposure; Growing copper and the energy transition.
- PAAS drivers: Silver-price leverage; MAG Silver and Juanicipio.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Barrick is a commodity producer, so its revenue and profits swing sharply with gold and copper prices, which it does not control and which can fall in stronger-growth or higher-real-rate environments; gold's slide to a two-month low in early October 2026 on expectations of further Federal Reserve tightening is a recent example, and the stock fell about 6% over the following month. For PAAS, pan American's results are highly cyclical and move with silver and gold prices, which are volatile and outside the company's control, so margins and the share price can swing sharply.
B or PAAS: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick B if you believe its drivers more; PAAS if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the B and PAAS guides.
B vs PAAS: the full fundamentals
B. Barrick's valuation is inherently cyclical because earnings move with gold and copper prices the company does not control. At about 10.5 times trailing and 9.3 times forward earnings, and under 6 times EV/EBITDA, the stock prices in some doubt that 2026's metal prices will last, which is typical near strong points in the metals cycle. Consensus expects 2026 EPS of about $3.63 on about $21.5 billion of revenue and 2027 EPS of about $4.37. Q3 2026 results are due November 9, 2026. Figures are approximate and move sharply with commodity prices; verify current numbers before relying on them.
PAAS. At $44.06 on October 16, 2026, PAAS trades near 13 times trailing and 10 times forward earnings, cheaper than earlier in the year because the share price fell faster than earnings estimates during the late-September metals slump. Pan American's financials are commodity-driven, and as a primary silver producer it offers operating leverage to the silver price in particular, so earnings can rise or fall faster than the metal itself. Reading PAAS means weighing production growth, all-in sustaining costs, and the metal-price environment together rather than a single multiple.
Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): B shows revenue (ttm) ~$20.7 billion (latest quarter up ~44% YoY; FY2025 ~$17 billion), net income (ttm) ~$6.5 billion (~32% net margin), eps (ttm / q2 2026) ~$3.87 / $0.82 (in line with estimates), p/e (trailing / forward) ~10.5x / ~9.3x; PAAS shows silver production (2025) ~22.8 million ounces attributable; 2026 guidance ~25.0 to 27.0 million, gold production (2025) ~742,000 ounces attributable; 2026 guidance ~700,000 to 750,000, revenue (ttm) ~$4.3 billion; Q2 2026 ~$1.12 billion (up ~38% YoY), net income (ttm) ~$1.38 billion, EPS ~$3.38; operating margin ~38%.
The bottom line: B vs PAAS
B and PAAS are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined B and PAAS exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how B or PAAS fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Barrick Mining Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how B fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between B and PAAS?
+
Barrick Mining Corporation (B) is one of the world's largest gold producers and, increasingly, a major copper producer. Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS) is a Vancouver-based precious-metals mining company and one of the largest primary silver producers in the world, with significant gold output alongside the silver. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is B or PAAS the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. B is the larger incumbent; PAAS is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, B or PAAS?
+
On forward P/E (as of October 2026), B trades at 9.49x and PAAS at 10.15x, so B is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both B and PAAS?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of B vs PAAS?
+
B: Barrick is a commodity producer, so its revenue and profits swing sharply with gold and copper prices, which it does not control and which can fall in stronger-growth or higher-real-rate environments; gold's slide to a two-month low in early October 2026 on expectations of further Federal Reserve tightening is a recent example, and the stock fell about 6% over the following month. Consensus already expects quarterly earnings to dip slightly in Q4 2026 from Q3. Its mines are spread across jurisdictions with meaningful political, regulatory, tax, and security risk, including a well-publicized dispute with the government of Mali over the Loulo-Gounkoto complex and security reviews at the Reko Diq project in Pakistan. Mining is capital intensive and carries operational, environmental, and permitting risks, and costs can rise with energy and labor inflation. The stock is cyclical and can be volatile, and it is a commodity-leveraged position rather than a steady income or defensive holding. PAAS: Pan American's results are highly cyclical and move with silver and gold prices, which are volatile and outside the company's control, so margins and the share price can swing sharply. Jurisdictional and political risk is significant because its mines are concentrated across Latin America (Mexico, Peru, Bolivia, Argentina, and more), where tax, permitting, community-relations, and resource-nationalism risks recur. The Escobal mine in Guatemala remains suspended since 2017 with the Xinka Parliament having denied consent in 2025 and no restart timeline, capping a large silver asset. Cost inflation and rising all-in sustaining costs can erode margins, and integrating large acquisitions such as MAG Silver and Yamana carries execution risk. The 2026 share-price path shows how fast sentiment turns: from a 52-week high near $70 to $44.06 on October 16, 2026, and Q2 2026 adjusted EPS of $0.73 missed the roughly $0.87 estimate.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell B or PAAS; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.