BN vs KKR: How Brookfield Corporation and KKR & Co Compare (2026)
Last updated August 2026
Short answer
BN and KKR are similarly sized, but BN trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (7.51x vs 13.81x): the market is paying up for KKR's profile and pricing BN more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.
BN vs KKR: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | BN | KKR | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $98.46B | $94.58B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 7.51 | 13.81 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 86.43 | 34.50 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.84 | 1.79 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 53% of range | 27% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.31 | 3.23 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: BN is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how BN and KKR affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. BN and KKR share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined BN and KKR exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does Brookfield Corporation (BN) do?
Brookfield Corporation sits at the top of the Brookfield group and reports through three pillars. Asset management runs through its roughly 73% interest in Brookfield Asset Management, whose fee-bearing capital reached ~$614 billion in the first quarter of 2026, up ~12% year over year on ~$67 billion of year-to-date fundraising that included a ~$40 billion investment mandate from UK annuity provider Just Group. Wealth solutions is the annuity and pension-risk-transfer business (Brookfield Wealth Solutions, built from American National, Argo Group and American Equity Life) that gathers policyholder money and invests it alongside Brookfield's own funds. The third pillar is the operating businesses, held partly through the listed affiliates: Brookfield Renewable (BEP/BEPC), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIP/BIPC), Brookfield Business Partners (BBU/BBUC) and a wholly owned real estate book that includes Canary Wharf, Brookfield Place and Ala Moana Center. Bruce Flatt has run the company since 2002, and the December 2022 reorganisation is what created the BN-versus-BAM split: BN kept the balance sheet and the carried interest, BAM was carved out as the pure-play, high-payout manager.
What does KKR & Co (KKR) do?
KKR & Co is a global alternative asset manager that raises capital from institutions and increasingly from individuals, then invests it across private equity, growth equity, real estate, infrastructure, and public and private credit, while also running a capital-markets business. It organizes into three areas: Asset Management (the core fund franchises and capital markets), Insurance (the Global Atlantic life and annuity business, which gives KKR a large permanent-capital balance sheet), and Strategic Holdings (long-duration stakes in companies KKR controls). As of early 2026 it managed roughly $758 billion in assets, ranking among the biggest names in alternatives alongside Blackstone, Apollo, Ares, and Carlyle. Its economics rest on management fees that scale with AUM, performance fees (carried interest) earned when funds do well, and gains on its own balance-sheet investments.
BN vs KKR: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- BN drivers: Fee-bearing capital and carried interest at BAM; The insurance and annuity flywheel.
- KKR drivers: Secular growth of private markets; Rising fee-related earnings.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The reported financials are hard to underwrite: consolidation pulls in revenue and debt from entities BN does not fully own, so ~$79 billion of trailing revenue and ~$1.2 billion of attributable net income describe the same company, and an investor has to accept management's distributable earnings framing to value it. For KKR, kKR's results are inherently cyclical: carried interest and investment gains depend on healthy markets, active deal flow, and the ability to exit investments profitably, so a downturn or a frozen IPO and M&A market can sharply cut realized earnings even as management fees hold up.
BN or KKR: which should you pick?
BN vs KKR: the full fundamentals
BN. First quarter 2026 revenue was ~$18.6 billion with net income of ~$1.04 billion, against ~$215 million a year earlier, so the year-over-year jump reflects mark movements more than a step change in operations. The reported P/E near ~86x is not a like-for-like multiple: depreciation on infrastructure and the share of consolidated profit belonging to outside partners both sit between revenue and attributable earnings. Second quarter 2026 results are scheduled for August 13, 2026, with consensus around ~$0.65 per share before the release.
KKR. Figures are approximate and tied to the asOf date; verify live numbers before acting. Alternative managers like KKR are often valued on fee-related earnings and distributable earnings rather than headline GAAP net income, because carried interest and balance-sheet gains make reported profit lumpy. AUM growth, the mix between recurring fees and performance fees, and the health of exit markets matter more than any single quarter's EPS. Compare KKR's multiple against peers such as Blackstone, Apollo, and Ares rather than against traditional banks.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): BN shows share price / market cap ~$44 per share, ~$101 billion (Aug 7, 2026 close), revenue (ttm) ~$79 billion, net income attributable (ttm) ~$1.2 billion, a reported P/E near ~86x, distributable earnings (q1 2026) ~$1.6 billion, ~$0.66 per share (~$1.4 billion before realizations); KKR shows assets under management ~$758 billion as of early 2026 (approximate, verify live), business mix Asset Management, Insurance (Global Atlantic), and Strategic Holdings, fee-related earnings A growing, recurring profit stream that management has prioritized (verify latest figure), credit rating A rated by S&P and Fitch, with long average debt maturity and a low fixed coupon.
The bottom line: BN vs KKR
BN and KKR are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined BN and KKR exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how BN or KKR fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in Brookfield Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how BN fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between BN and KKR?
+
Brookfield Corporation sits at the top of the Brookfield group and reports through three pillars. KKR & Co is a global alternative asset manager that raises capital from institutions and increasingly from individuals, then invests it across private equity, growth equity, real estate, infrastructure, and public and private credit, while also running a capital-markets business. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is BN or KKR the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, BN or KKR?
+
On forward P/E (as of August 2026), BN trades at 7.51x and KKR at 13.81x, so BN is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both BN and KKR?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of BN vs KKR?
+
BN: The reported financials are hard to underwrite: consolidation pulls in revenue and debt from entities BN does not fully own, so ~$79 billion of trailing revenue and ~$1.2 billion of attributable net income describe the same company, and an investor has to accept management's distributable earnings framing to value it. Leverage sits mostly at the asset level in non-recourse form, which limits contagion but leaves refinancing exposed to long rates and credit spreads across hundreds of separate structures. The office and retail real estate book has already required writedowns and remains the least liquid piece. The insurance pillar introduces a different risk set entirely: spread compression if rates fall, reserve assumptions on long-dated annuities, and regulators in multiple jurisdictions reviewing private-capital ownership of annuity liabilities. Carried interest and realization gains depend on exit markets that shut for long stretches, and BN's ~1.8 beta means the stock has historically fallen harder than the index when they do. KKR: KKR's results are inherently cyclical: carried interest and investment gains depend on healthy markets, active deal flow, and the ability to exit investments profitably, so a downturn or a frozen IPO and M&A market can sharply cut realized earnings even as management fees hold up. Higher interest rates raise financing costs for leveraged deals and can pressure the valuations of both its funds and its balance-sheet holdings. The Global Atlantic insurance arm adds credit, spread, and regulatory risk that most pure asset managers do not carry. Because KKR invests its own capital, GAAP earnings can be volatile and mark-to-market swings can be large. Fundraising can slow if institutions pull back from alternatives, and the firm competes intensely with Blackstone, Apollo, and Ares for capital and deals. Regulatory scrutiny of private markets and private credit is an ongoing overhang.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell BN or KKR; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.