CAJPY vs SONY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated October 2026

Short answer

SONY is the larger of the two ($145.26B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (20.91x forward earnings, beta 0.81). CAJPY is the smaller challenger ($25.32B), cheaper on forward earnings (13.60x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

CAJPY vs SONY: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricCAJPYSONYWhat it tells you
Market cap$25.32B$145.26BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E13.6020.91Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E11.8520.56Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.280.81Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range72% of range50% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book1.172.76How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: CAJPY is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how CAJPY and SONY affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CAJPY and SONY share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CAJPY and SONY exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Canon Inc. (CAJPY) do?

Canon Inc. is a Tokyo-headquartered manufacturer founded in 1937 that now runs four businesses. Printing (office multifunction printers, laser and inkjet printers, and commercial production presses) is still the largest, with ~¥2.49 trillion of 2025 sales, a little over half the group, and a ~10% segment margin built on toner, ink and service contracts. Imaging (EOS mirrorless and compact cameras, lenses and Axis network surveillance cameras) grew ~12.5% to ~¥1.05 trillion in 2025 at a ~16% margin and is now the most profitable growth engine. Medical (CT, MRI, ultrasound and X-ray systems through Canon Medical Systems, the former Toshiba Medical) brought in ~¥581 billion, and Industrial covers semiconductor lithography steppers, nanoimprint lithography and display manufacturing equipment. Its primary listing is on the Tokyo Stock Exchange under code 7751. Canon voluntarily delisted from the New York Stock Exchange in 2016, and US investors now hold it through the CAJPY American Depositary Receipt, which trades over the counter, with each ADR representing one ordinary share.

Full CAJPY guide

What does Sony Group (SONY) do?

Sony Group (SONY) is a diversified Japanese entertainment and technology conglomerate whose US-listed shares trade on the NYSE as an American depositary receipt (ADR) representing ordinary shares listed in Tokyo. The company spans several large, distinct businesses: gaming through PlayStation, its consoles, the PlayStation Network, and first-party studios; recorded music and music publishing through Sony Music, one of the largest music companies in the world; film and television through Sony Pictures; and image sensors through its Imaging and Sensing Solutions unit, a leader in the CMOS sensors used in smartphone cameras. It also makes consumer electronics such as cameras, TVs, and audio products. This mix means Sony is part media and content company, part semiconductor supplier, and part hardware maker, so no single end market drives the whole company. Because SONY is a Japanese company reported in yen, the dollar value of the ADR is affected by the yen-to-dollar exchange rate as well as by the underlying business. Headquartered in Tokyo, Sony is often viewed as a way to own a broad basket of gaming, music, film, and imaging assets in a single stock. As of October 16, 2026, SONY closed near $24.94 (52-week range about $19.32 to $30.34), giving a market value of roughly $146 billion. The shares are down about 3.6% year to date and about 12.5% over one year, though they have rebounded roughly 19% over the past three months. In the June 2026 quarter Sony reported revenue of about 2.84 trillion yen and earnings per ADR of about $0.36 against a consensus near $0.25, a clear beat after a soft March quarter ($0.09 versus about $0.13 expected).

Full SONY guide

CAJPY vs SONY: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • CAJPY drivers: Imaging and network cameras; Semiconductor lithography and nanoimprint.
  • SONY drivers: PlayStation and a growing content and services model; Music and content libraries.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Printing is in long-term structural decline as offices print less, so Canon must keep finding growth elsewhere to offset a segment that still produces over half its sales. For SONY, sony is a diversified conglomerate, so weakness in one segment can be offset by others, but the same breadth means it rarely moves as a pure play on any single trend an investor is chasing.

CAJPY or SONY: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CAJPY if you believe its drivers more; SONY if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CAJPY and SONY guides.

CAJPY vs SONY: the full fundamentals

CAJPY. Canon trades at a low multiple relative to US hardware peers, reflecting low single-digit sales growth and the drag of a mature printing business that is more than half of revenue. The valuation case leans on cash returns: a ~40% payout target and repeated buybacks, including ¥100 billion in 2025 and ¥200 billion completed in September 2026, which together retire a few percent of the share count a year. Analyst targets on the Tokyo shares averaged around ¥4,800 in recent listings, modestly above the ~¥4,400 trading level. Figures are approximate and the dollar values move with the yen.

SONY. At about 21 times both trailing and forward earnings, SONY is priced for steady rather than fast growth, since analysts expect earnings per ADR to be roughly flat between the years to March 2027 and March 2028, and its dividend yield is small at about 0.6%. Because the company spans very different businesses with different economics, a single blended multiple can obscure the parts, and the spin-off of the financial-services business still distorts year-over-year comparisons. Figures are approximate, move with the yen and one-time items, and should be verified before relying on them.

Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): CAJPY shows revenue (ttm) ~¥4.7 trillion (2026 guidance ~¥4.8 trillion), operating profit (2026 guidance) ~¥465 billion (~9.7% margin), net income (2026 guidance) ~¥340 billion, market cap ~$25 billion (ADR ~$29, 1 ADR = 1 share); SONY shows revenue (ttm) ~12.7 trillion yen, up ~8% year over year in the latest quarter, operating margin ~17% (gross margin ~32%), net income (ttm) ~1.1 trillion yen, eps per adr (trailing / fy to march 2027 estimate) ~$1.21 / ~$1.42.

The bottom line: CAJPY vs SONY

CAJPY and SONY are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CAJPY and SONY exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how CAJPY or SONY fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Canon Inc. with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how CAJPY fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between CAJPY and SONY?

+

Canon Inc. Sony Group (SONY) is a diversified Japanese entertainment and technology conglomerate whose US-listed shares trade on the NYSE as an American depositary receipt (ADR) representing ordinary shares listed in Tokyo. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is CAJPY or SONY the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. SONY is the larger incumbent; CAJPY is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, CAJPY or SONY?

+

On forward P/E (as of October 2026), CAJPY trades at 13.60x and SONY at 20.91x, so CAJPY is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both CAJPY and SONY?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of CAJPY vs SONY?

+

CAJPY: Printing is in long-term structural decline as offices print less, so Canon must keep finding growth elsewhere to offset a segment that still produces over half its sales. The medical segment has suffered production disruptions and component shortages in 2026 and has historically earned thin margins (~5.6% in 2025) relative to the price Canon paid for Toshiba Medical. Higher memory chip prices, energy and materials costs linked to the Middle East situation and shifting US trade policy all pressure margins; Canon's 2026 plan includes ~¥35 billion of expected Middle East headwinds and ~¥6 billion from memory costs, offset by ~¥37.5 billion of tariff relief that may not recur. Competition is intense in every segment, from Sony in cameras to ASML and Nikon in lithography and Siemens Healthineers and GE HealthCare in medical. For CAJPY holders specifically, returns are earned in yen and converted to dollars, so a stronger yen can raise the ADR price while hurting Canon's reported profit, and vice versa; dividends are paid in yen, converted by the depositary (minus fees) and may be subject to Japanese withholding tax. The ADR trades over the counter rather than on an exchange, which can mean wider bid-ask spreads and less liquidity than the Tokyo shares. SONY: Sony is a diversified conglomerate, so weakness in one segment can be offset by others, but the same breadth means it rarely moves as a pure play on any single trend an investor is chasing. Gaming is cyclical around console launches and hit software, and hardware can sell at thin margins early in a cycle. Image sensors depend heavily on the smartphone market and on a concentrated set of large customers, exposing the unit to phone demand and supply-chain swings. Pictures results can be volatile with the theatrical box office and release timing. Because SONY is a yen-reported ADR, a stronger dollar or weaker yen can reduce dollar returns even when the underlying business is stable. It also faces intense competition across gaming, music, film, and semiconductors, plus broad exposure to global consumer spending. Two newer pressures stand out as of October 2026: rising memory and storage costs that are lifting console prices and depressing hardware unit sales, and the shares' 12.5% decline over the past year despite higher operating earnings. On the positive side, Moody's moved Sony's credit outlook to positive in October 2026 while affirming its A2 rating.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell CAJPY or SONY; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.