CBRE vs NMRK: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated September 2026
Short answer
CBRE is the larger of the two ($41.83B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (15.88x forward earnings, beta 1.19). NMRK is the smaller challenger ($3.68B), cheaper on forward earnings (6.81x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
CBRE vs NMRK: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | CBRE | NMRK | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $41.83B | $3.68B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 15.88 | 6.81 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 32.98 | 18.77 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.19 | 1.67 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 43% of range | 26% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 4.99 | 1.89 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: NMRK is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how CBRE and NMRK affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CBRE and NMRK share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CBRE and NMRK exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does CBRE Group (CBRE) do?
CBRE Group is a Dallas-based commercial real estate services and investment company, the largest of its kind in the world by revenue. It earns money across property leasing and sales advisory, facilities and building operations management, project management, mortgage and loan servicing, and investment management. The business is organized around Advisory Services, Building Operations & Experience, Project Management, and Real Estate Investments, and a large and growing portion of its work now flows through infrastructure assets such as data centers plus power, telecom, and transportation facilities.
What does Newmark Group (NMRK) do?
Newmark Group is a global commercial real estate advisor and service provider that works with institutional investors, corporations, and owners and occupiers across the full property life cycle. Its business spans capital markets (investment sales and mortgage brokerage), leasing (landlord and tenant representation), and a growing base of recurring management services including property management, valuation and advisory, loan servicing, and GSE/FHA multifamily financing. The firm has more than 7,000 professionals and completed over $1.7 trillion in transaction volume across the past two years, positioning it as a significant challenger just below the industry's Big Four.
CBRE vs NMRK: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- CBRE drivers: Infrastructure and data center services; Recovery in transactional markets.
- NMRK drivers: Capital markets recovery; Growing recurring services.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: CBRE's transactional revenue is deeply cyclical and can fall sharply when interest rates rise or credit tightens, as it did during the 2022 to 2023 property downturn. For NMRK, newmark's core leasing and capital markets fees are highly cyclical and tied directly to interest rates, transaction volumes, and broader economic confidence.
CBRE or NMRK: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CBRE if you believe its drivers more; NMRK if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CBRE and NMRK guides.
CBRE vs NMRK: the full fundamentals
CBRE. As of July 2026 CBRE carries a market cap near $41 billion on roughly $42 billion of trailing revenue, with services revenue being a lower-margin, high-volume business. The trailing P/E of around 30x reflects the earnings recovery from the property downturn and optimism about infrastructure-driven growth, while the forward multiple sits lower on expected EPS gains. Figures are approximate and change with market conditions.
NMRK. Newmark trades around the mid-teens per share with a market cap near $3.5 billion after a large multi-year run. On raised 2026 guidance the stock carries a mid-to-high single-digit forward earnings multiple on adjusted EPS, reflecting both its cyclical profile and improving growth. Reported GAAP margins remain thin (TTM operating margin in the mid-single digits) because much of the profit is captured in adjusted, transaction-linked figures.
Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): CBRE shows revenue (ttm) ~$42 billion, q1 2026 revenue ~$10.5 billion (up ~19%), market cap ~$41 billion, 2026 core eps guidance ~$7.60 to $7.80; NMRK shows revenue (ttm) ~$3.3B, fy2026 revenue guidance ~$3.775B-$3.875B, fy2026 adjusted eps guidance ~$1.87-$1.98, q1 2026 revenue ~$846.5M (+27% YoY).
The bottom line: CBRE vs NMRK
CBRE and NMRK are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CBRE and NMRK exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how CBRE or NMRK fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in CBRE Group with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how CBRE fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between CBRE and NMRK?
+
CBRE Group is a Dallas-based commercial real estate services and investment company, the largest of its kind in the world by revenue. Newmark Group is a global commercial real estate advisor and service provider that works with institutional investors, corporations, and owners and occupiers across the full property life cycle. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is CBRE or NMRK the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. CBRE is the larger incumbent; NMRK is the smaller challenger and looks cheaper on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, CBRE or NMRK?
+
On forward P/E (as of September 2026), CBRE trades at 15.88x and NMRK at 6.81x, so NMRK is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both CBRE and NMRK?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of CBRE vs NMRK?
+
CBRE: CBRE's transactional revenue is deeply cyclical and can fall sharply when interest rates rise or credit tightens, as it did during the 2022 to 2023 property downturn. The office segment faces secular pressure from hybrid work and elevated vacancy in some markets, which can weigh on leasing and valuation activity. The Real Estate Investments and development arm carries direct exposure to property values and financing costs, adding balance-sheet risk. The stock trades at a premium multiple, so a slower-than-expected transaction recovery could disappoint. Broad macroeconomic weakness, a commercial real estate credit shock, or a pullback in data center spending would all pressure results. NMRK: Newmark's core leasing and capital markets fees are highly cyclical and tied directly to interest rates, transaction volumes, and broader economic confidence. A renewed rise in rates or a stall in commercial real estate activity would quickly pressure the segments driving recent growth. The company also carries meaningful leverage (debt-to-EBITDA reported near 4.9x in late 2025), which amplifies downside in a downturn. Exposure to weaker property sectors such as older office assets remains a structural overhang. Finally, the stock has re-rated substantially after a large run, leaving less margin for disappointment against elevated expectations.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell CBRE or NMRK; figures are approximate and dated (as of September 2026). Verify current data before investing.