CHRW vs RXO: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Same yardstick, side by side (as of September 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: CHRW is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. CHRW and RXO share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined CHRW and RXO exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

C.H. Robinson Worldwide is one of the world's largest logistics platforms, operating an asset-light model: it owns very few trucks or ships and instead brokers capacity, matching shippers who need goods moved with the carriers that move them. Its two core engines are North American Surface Transportation (NAST, roughly two-thirds of net revenue, spanning truckload and less-than-truckload brokerage) and Global Forwarding (ocean, air, and customs). The company earns a spread between what shippers pay and what carriers charge, so its profitability tracks freight-market pricing and volume cycles more than gross revenue, which simply passes through freight costs.

Full CHRW guide

RXO, Inc. was created in November 2022 when XPO spun off its asset-light North American brokered transportation business. The company does not own tractors or trailers. It sells capacity to shippers, buys it from independent carriers, and keeps the spread, which is why revenue is large (~$5.7 billion trailing twelve months) and margins are thin. Truck brokerage is roughly 74% of revenue, with two complementary businesses making up the rest: Last Mile (~18%), which delivers heavy goods like appliances and furniture into homes, and Managed Transportation (~8%), which runs outsourced freight departments for large shippers under multi-year contracts. In September 2024 RXO paid about $1.025 billion for Coyote Logistics from UPS, roughly doubling brokerage volume and moving RXO into the top three North American truck brokers behind C.H. Robinson and Total Quality Logistics. Management has said Coyote synergies run to at least $50 million.

Full RXO guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• CHRW drivers: Margin expansion through automation and cost discipline; Scale and network advantage as the #1 broker.
• RXO drivers: Truckload capacity leaving the market; Operating leverage on a fixed cost base.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: CHRW operates in an intensely competitive, low-margin industry where it faces asset-based carriers (J.B. For RXO, the largest near-term risk is legal rather than cyclical.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick CHRW if you believe its drivers more; RXO if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the CHRW and RXO guides.

CHRW. CHRW trades at a premium mid-30s P/E, a multiple that reflects the market crediting its recent margin turnaround and pricing in an eventual freight-cycle recovery rather than current revenue growth (2025 revenue fell about 8 percent as freight costs passed through lower). Q1 2026 continued the pattern: revenue was roughly flat near $4.0 billion while EPS grew about 15 percent year over year to $1.35. The dividend yields around 1.5 percent with a multi-year record of increases.

RXO. Price-to-earnings does not apply while the company is loss-making, so RXO is usually valued on EV to a normalized EBITDA figure, and the gap between trough EBITDA (roughly $120 million trailing) and what management thinks a recovered cycle looks like is the entire argument. The stock traded between ~$10 and ~$30 over the past year and roughly doubled in 2026 before falling back on the broker-liability news, which tells you the market is repricing the cycle assumption rather than the current results. February 2026 refinancing pushed the senior notes to May 2031 at 6.375% from 7.500%, upsized to $400 million, leaving ~$386 million of available liquidity.

Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): CHRW shows revenue (2025 / ttm) ~$16.2B, net income (2025) ~$587M, diluted eps (2025) ~$4.83, market cap ~$20B; RXO shows revenue (ttm) ~$5.7B, net income (ttm) ~-$105M (~-$0.62 per share), adjusted ebitda (q1 2026) ~$6M on ~$1.43B revenue, market cap ~$3.6B (~$22 per share).

CHRW and RXO are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined CHRW and RXO exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.