ESLT vs NXSNF: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated October 2026

Short answer

ESLT is the larger of the two ($35.40B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (40.59x forward earnings, beta -0.30). NXSNF is the smaller challenger ($5.65B): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

ESLT vs NXSNF: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricESLTNXSNFWhat it tells you
Market cap$35.40B$5.65BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Trailing P/E56.8439.35Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta-0.300.80Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price / book8.018.35How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Before you buy: how ESLT and NXSNF affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ESLT and NXSNF share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ESLT and NXSNF exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does Elbit Systems Ltd (ESLT) do?

Elbit Systems Ltd (Nasdaq and Tel Aviv: ESLT) is an Israel-based defense technology company that develops, manufactures, integrates and sustains military systems across land, sea, air, cyber and space domains. Its portfolio spans C4ISR (command, control and intelligence systems), electro-optics and thermal imaging, unmanned aerial and ground systems, precision munitions and artillery rockets (including its PULS launcher), helmet-mounted displays for pilots, and electronic warfare. The company employs about 21,000 people across five continents and generates a large share of sales from export customers, with roughly 72% of its order backlog attributable to orders from outside Israel as of the end of 2025.

Full ESLT guide

What does NextVision Stabilized Systems (NXSNF) do?

NextVision Stabilized Systems designs and sells small, lightweight, gyro-stabilized camera payloads (gimbals) that sit under drones, tethered aerostats, and ground or naval vehicles. Its cameras combine day and thermal imaging with onboard tracking software in units that often weigh well under a kilogram, which matters because every gram on a small drone costs flight time. NextVision mostly sells to drone and system makers rather than directly to armies, so its products end up inside other companies' aircraft. The company is based in Israel, listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange in 2021, joined the TA-35 index, and its shares in the US trade over the counter as NXSNF, a foreign ordinary-share line priced in dollars that tracks the shekel-denominated Tel Aviv shares.

Full NXSNF guide

ESLT vs NXSNF: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • ESLT drivers: Record backlog and revenue visibility; European rearmament tailwind.
  • NXSNF drivers: Drone volumes as a consumable market; Production capacity and margins.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most cited risk is valuation: ESLT trades at about 56 times trailing earnings and 41 times forward earnings as of October 2026, far above the industrials-sector average, so disappointing execution could compress the multiple sharply. For NXSNF, the biggest risk is that demand is linked to active conflicts and emergency defense budgets.

ESLT or NXSNF: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick ESLT if you believe its drivers more; NXSNF if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ESLT and NXSNF guides.

ESLT vs NXSNF: the full fundamentals

ESLT. As of October 16, 2026, ESLT traded around $745 per share with a market cap near $35 billion, roughly 56 times trailing earnings and 41 times forward earnings, with EV/EBITDA near 35x. The premium reflects a record backlog, mid-teens revenue growth and consistent earnings beats. Q3 2026 results are scheduled for November 24, with consensus near $3.89 EPS on about $2.26 billion of revenue.

NXSNF. Trailing figures combine reported 2025 results (~$168 million revenue, ~$104 million net income) with first-half 2026 results (~$156 million revenue, ~$92 million net income). The market value has swung widely, from near NIS 36 billion in March 2026 to roughly NIS 20 billion in August, so multiples move quickly with the share price and the shekel. On the 2026 revenue target the stock trades at roughly 17x to 20x sales, a premium that assumes much of the current growth and profitability holds beyond the present wave of drone procurement.

Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): ESLT shows revenue (ttm) ~$8.55B, revenue growth (q2 2026, yoy) ~16%, margins (operating / net) ~9.6% / ~7.4%, eps (ttm) ~$13.29; NXSNF shows revenue (ttm) ~$250M, net income (ttm) ~$170M, 2026 revenue target ~$355M, market cap ~$6B to $7B.

The bottom line: ESLT vs NXSNF

ESLT and NXSNF are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ESLT and NXSNF exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how ESLT or NXSNF fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in Elbit Systems Ltd with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how ESLT fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between ESLT and NXSNF?

+

Elbit Systems Ltd (Nasdaq and Tel Aviv: ESLT) is an Israel-based defense technology company that develops, manufactures, integrates and sustains military systems across land, sea, air, cyber and space domains. NextVision Stabilized Systems designs and sells small, lightweight, gyro-stabilized camera payloads (gimbals) that sit under drones, tethered aerostats, and ground or naval vehicles. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is ESLT or NXSNF the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. ESLT is the larger incumbent; NXSNF is the smaller challenger. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, ESLT or NXSNF?

+

A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both ESLT and NXSNF?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of ESLT vs NXSNF?

+

ESLT: The most cited risk is valuation: ESLT trades at about 56 times trailing earnings and 41 times forward earnings as of October 2026, far above the industrials-sector average, so disappointing execution could compress the multiple sharply. The stock has already fallen roughly 27% from its 52-week high, and the analyst consensus is a hold with a mean target near $801. Israel-specific geopolitical and reputational exposure is real, as some European governments have at times restricted or scrutinized arms purchases from Israeli suppliers, and ESG-driven divestment pressure has surfaced; Israeli elections and Iran-related tensions add headline risk. The company also carries currency exposure to the Israeli shekel and depends on sustained elevated global defense spending, which could soften if conflicts de-escalate or budgets are reprioritized. A shelf prospectus filed in Israel in September 2026 leaves room for future securities issuance. Program delays, supply-chain constraints and heavy reliance on government customers add execution and concentration risk. NXSNF: The biggest risk is that demand is linked to active conflicts and emergency defense budgets. A ceasefire in Ukraine or calmer conditions in the Middle East could slow orders; Globes attributed a ~45% three-month share decline in mid-2026 partly to defense stocks cooling after tensions with Iran eased. Customer concentration is hard to assess because NextVision usually does not name buyers, and a few large drone makers or governments may account for much of revenue. Export licensing by Israel's defense ministry and politics around Israeli defense exports can delay or block deals. Competition is growing, from Western gimbal makers to low-cost Asian suppliers, and margins near 60% invite rivals and buyer pushback on price. Component supply for thermal sensors and optics could cap output. Valuation is demanding, so even record results have triggered sell-offs. For US holders, NXSNF trades thinly with wide bid-ask spreads, the primary market is in shekels on a different time zone, and there is no SEC-registered reporting, so disclosures come through Tel Aviv filings.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell ESLT or NXSNF; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.