GXO vs R: How GXO Logistics and Ryder System Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. GXO and R share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined GXO and R exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

GXO Logistics was spun off from XPO in 2021 and does one thing: it runs warehouses and fulfilment centres for other companies. Blue-chip customers in e-commerce, retail, aerospace and defence, technology, industrials and life sciences hand GXO their inventory, and GXO stores, picks, packs, ships and handles returns under multi-year contracts, typically in facilities it leases rather than owns. That makes it asset-light in the sense that it does not own trucks, ships or planes, though it does invest heavily in warehouse robotics, automated storage and retrieval systems and its own software. Roughly 800 sites span North America and Europe, with the United Kingdom the single largest revenue geography after the April 2024 acquisition of Wincanton, followed by the United States, the Netherlands, France, Spain and Italy.

Full GXO guide

Ryder System, Inc. is one of the largest commercial fleet and logistics companies in North America, operating through three segments: Fleet Management Solutions (full-service truck leasing, commercial rental, and maintenance, roughly 38% of revenue), Supply Chain Solutions (integrated port-to-door logistics for automotive, consumer goods, healthcare, retail, and other industries, roughly 43%), and Dedicated Transportation Solutions (turnkey fleets plus professional drivers, roughly 18%). The company runs a fleet of well over 200,000 vehicles and has spent recent years deliberately tilting its mix toward long-term contractual revenue and away from the volatile transactional rental and used-vehicle-sales businesses.

Full R guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• GXO drivers: Contracted revenue visibility from new wins; Automation and the GXO IQ AI layer.
• R drivers: Mix shift to contractual revenue; Used-vehicle sales and residual values.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: GAAP profitability is very thin: $27 million of net income on $3.4 billion of Q2 revenue leaves almost no cushion if wage inflation, a site ramp problem or a lost contract goes the wrong way. For R, ryder is cyclical and asset-heavy, so a prolonged freight recession or a drop in used-truck prices can hit both leasing utilization and gains on vehicle sales at the same time.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick GXO if you believe its drivers more; R if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the GXO and R guides.

GXO. The trailing P/E looks distorted because GAAP net income is compressed by amortization, restructuring and interest, so the market prices GXO off adjusted figures: full-year 2026 guidance is $945 million to $965 million of adjusted EBITDA and $2.95 to $3.15 of adjusted diluted EPS, against roughly 4 to 5 percent organic revenue growth. Q2 2026 delivered $3.44 billion of revenue (up 4.3 percent, 3.4 percent organic), $219 million of adjusted EBITDA and $0.59 of adjusted EPS, with the shares falling roughly 6 to 9 percent afterward on a slight revenue miss versus consensus near $3.46 billion. At about $48 per share the stock trades near 0.39x sales and about 13.5x EV/EBITDA, with a beta around 1.55 and no dividend.

R. Ryder trades at a mid-to-high-teens forward multiple that reflects both its improved contractual mix and the market's caution about the freight cycle. It raised the quarterly dividend about 11% to $1.01 per share in July 2026 (a forward yield around 1.5%) and guided to $700 million to $800 million of full-year free cash flow. Some analysts view the shares as fully valued after a strong run.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): GXO shows revenue (ttm) ~$13.6B, net income (ttm) ~$131M, diluted eps (ttm) ~$1.14, market cap ~$5.5B; R shows revenue (ttm) ~$12.6B, q1 2026 revenue ~$3.13B, q1 2026 adjusted eps ~$2.54, fy2026 eps guidance ~$14.05 to $14.80.

GXO and R are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined GXO and R exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.