ICL vs SQM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

SQM is the larger of the two ($19.15B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (9.67x forward earnings, beta 0.99). ICL is the smaller challenger ($7.16B), actually pricier on forward earnings (12.61x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

ICL vs SQM: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricICLSQMWhat it tells you
Market cap$7.16B$19.15BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E12.619.67Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E23.1323.45Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta0.980.99Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range36% of range50% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book1.173.27How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Reading it: SQM is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

Before you buy: how ICL and SQM affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. ICL and SQM share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined ICL and SQM exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does ICL Group Ltd (ICL) do?

ICL Group Ltd. runs four businesses out of a mineral base most competitors cannot replicate. Industrial Products extracts bromine from the highly concentrated Dead Sea brine and turns it into flame retardants, clear brine fluids and specialty minerals, making ICL the largest elemental bromine producer in the world alongside Albemarle and Lanxess. Potash comes from solar evaporation ponds at Sodom in Israel and from underground mines in Catalonia, Spain. Phosphate Solutions works phosphate rock from the Negev and China into fertilisers and higher value food and industrial specialties, and Growing Solutions sells controlled release and water soluble fertilisers, biostimulants and micronutrients into agriculture, turf and ornamental markets. The company employs about ~12,000 people, reports in US dollars under IFRS as a foreign private issuer, and had ~1.29 billion ordinary shares outstanding at the end of 2025.

Full ICL guide

What does Sociedad Quimica y Minera (SQM) do?

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile, known as SQM, is a Chilean mining and chemicals company and one of the world's largest producers of lithium, a critical material for electric-vehicle and energy-storage batteries. SQM extracts lithium from brine in Chile's Atacama Desert, one of the lowest-cost and highest-quality lithium resources globally, under a concession with the Chilean state agency. Beyond lithium, SQM is a leading producer of specialty plant nutrients (potassium nitrate and specialty fertilizers), iodine (used in X-ray contrast media and other applications, where SQM is a global leader), and industrial chemicals. The company makes money selling these commodities and specialty products into global markets, with lithium being the most cyclical and most watched segment. SQM's fortunes are heavily tied to lithium prices, which swing sharply with EV demand and supply additions. Headquartered in Santiago, Chile, it trades in the US via American Depositary Receipts.

Full SQM guide

ICL vs SQM: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • ICL drivers: Potash pricing against a low cost Dead Sea position; Bromine and an improving specialty mix.
  • SQM drivers: Low-cost Atacama lithium resource; EV and energy-storage demand growth.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The Dead Sea Works concession covering ~652 square kilometres runs only to March 31, 2030, and ICL must win the successor concession from the Israeli state on terms the state sets, which is the largest open question in the equity. For SQM, sQM's earnings are highly cyclical and dominated by volatile lithium prices, which have swung dramatically as supply additions outpaced demand at times, crushing margins.

ICL or SQM: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick ICL if you believe its drivers more; SQM if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the ICL and SQM guides.

ICL vs SQM: the full fundamentals

ICL. ICL reports in US dollars under IFRS even though it is an Israeli issuer filing a Form 20-F, so no currency translation is needed to read these numbers. The reported price to earnings ratio of about ~23x overstates the expense, because 2025 absorbed roughly ~$293 million of impairments, closure charges and a Dead Sea water fee provision; on adjusted trailing earnings near ~$0.41 per share the multiple is closer to ~13x. Dividend policy is a payout of up to ~50% of adjusted annual net income, and ~$232 million was declared against 2025 results.

SQM. SQM is a commodity producer whose valuation and earnings track the lithium cycle. In upcycles margins and profits surge; in downcycles they compress sharply. The qualitative profile is a low-cost, diversified miner leveraged to long-term EV-battery demand but exposed to lithium-price volatility and Chilean policy. Earnings multiples are noisy and best read across a full cycle.

Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): ICL shows revenue (ttm) ~$7.7B, with Q2 2026 sales of ~$2.14B up ~17% year over year, adjusted ebitda (ttm) ~$1.64B; FY2026 guidance reiterated at ~$1.5B to ~$1.7B, diluted eps (ttm) ~$0.24 reported, ~$0.41 on an adjusted basis, ev / adjusted ebitda ~6x (market cap ~$7.2B plus ~$2.6B net financial liabilities); SQM shows revenue (ttm) ~$4 to 5 billion, highly variable with lithium prices, lithium revenue share the largest segment, swinging with commodity prices, operating margin wide swings; very high in lithium upcycles, compressed in downcycles, iodine position global market leader, a steadier earnings contributor.

The bottom line: ICL vs SQM

ICL and SQM are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined ICL and SQM exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how ICL or SQM fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in ICL Group Ltd with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how ICL fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between ICL and SQM?

+

ICL Group Ltd. Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile, known as SQM, is a Chilean mining and chemicals company and one of the world's largest producers of lithium, a critical material for electric-vehicle and energy-storage batteries. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is ICL or SQM the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. SQM is the larger incumbent; ICL is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, ICL or SQM?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), ICL trades at 12.61x and SQM at 9.67x, so SQM is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both ICL and SQM?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of ICL vs SQM?

+

ICL: The Dead Sea Works concession covering ~652 square kilometres runs only to March 31, 2030, and ICL must win the successor concession from the Israeli state on terms the state sets, which is the largest open question in the equity. Israeli country risk is concrete rather than theoretical here: the security situation has produced recurring charges, shekel appreciation lifts a cost base that sells in dollars, and regional shipping disruption affects both input costs and exports. Earnings remain levered to potash and phosphate pricing, so a soft grain year would give back a good part of the 2026 recovery. Net financial liabilities rose ~$375 million in the first half to about ~$2,635 million following an ~$800 million ten year note issue at ~6.036%, comfortable at roughly ~1.6 times adjusted EBITDA but less forgiving if prices turn. Several Israeli environmental and planning matters remain open, including petitions over the Pond 4 reuse plan and an appeal against the dismissal of a Haifa Bay air pollution class action, and none of these are securities fraud claims. SQM: SQM's earnings are highly cyclical and dominated by volatile lithium prices, which have swung dramatically as supply additions outpaced demand at times, crushing margins. A large wave of new lithium supply globally can keep prices depressed for extended periods. As a Chilean producer, SQM faces sovereign and regulatory risk: the state controls the Atacama concession, royalties and tax terms can change, and national lithium policy reshapes who controls future production. Currency, political, and resource-nationalism risks in Chile are real. EV-demand growth could disappoint or shift toward chemistries that use less lithium. The stock tends to trade with commodity sentiment, making it volatile.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell ICL or SQM; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    ICL vs SQM: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026? - Walnut AI Investing App