INTU vs TRI: How Intuit and Thomson Reuters Compare (2026)

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

Reading it: INTU is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. INTU and TRI share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined INTU and TRI exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

Intuit is a financial technology company built around four platforms: QuickBooks and Mailchimp for small and mid-market businesses, TurboTax for consumer tax filing, Credit Karma for consumer credit and personal finance, and a ProTax line for accountants. The company earns most of its revenue from recurring software subscriptions and services, with QuickBooks Online and TurboTax as the two largest profit engines. It generates high margins, returns cash through a growing dividend and large buybacks, and has been reorganizing its entire product suite around generative AI through its Intuit Assist assistant and a multi-year partnership with Anthropic to build custom AI agents.

Full INTU guide

Thomson Reuters Corporation is a Canadian-domiciled information services company headquartered in Toronto that sells research, workflow software and data to lawyers, accountants, tax professionals, corporate departments and governments. Its three core segments, known internally as the "Big 3" and about 83% of revenue, are Legal Professionals (Westlaw, Practical Law, CoCounsel), Corporates (legal, tax and trade compliance software for in-house teams) and Tax, Audit and Accounting Professionals (ONESOURCE, UltraTax, Checkpoint). It also owns Reuters, the global news agency, and a Global Print business it is now moving into a joint venture with KKR. Roughly 80% of revenue is recurring subscription revenue, which is why the company has compounded earnings and raised its dividend every year for more than three decades. The Woodbridge Company, the Thomson family holding vehicle, owns about 68% to 70% of the shares, so TRI is a controlled company with a long-term owner rather than a widely held one.

Full TRI guide

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

• INTU drivers: QuickBooks and the small-business platform; AI reinvention and the Anthropic partnership.
• TRI drivers: AI products built on proprietary content; Big 3 organic acceleration.

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The central risk is that AI assistants and free or low-cost automated tools erode the perceived value of paid tax preparation and bookkeeping, pressuring Intuit's pricing power and its historically premium multiple. For TRI, the dominant risk is AI substitution: if general-purpose agents from firms like Anthropic and OpenAI can perform enough legal drafting, research and financial analysis to displace paid seats, the subscription base and its pricing power both come under pressure, and February 2026 showed how violently the market will reprice that possibility.

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick INTU if you believe its drivers more; TRI if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the INTU and TRI guides.

INTU. Intuit posted about 10% revenue growth in fiscal Q3 2026 (the quarter ended April 2026, its seasonally largest tax quarter) and raised full-year guidance to roughly 13% to 14% growth with non-GAAP EPS around $23.80 to $23.85. Despite those results, the shares have fallen roughly 64% over the past year on AI-disruption fears, dropping from a 2025 peak near $800 to the mid-$270s and pushing the trailing P/E near 17, well below Intuit's ten-year median around 48. The result is a stock priced far more cautiously than its reported financials alone would suggest.

TRI. Thomson Reuters reported second-quarter 2026 revenue of about $1.95 billion, up 9%, with adjusted EPS of $0.99 and free cash flow of $727 million, and raised full-year guidance to roughly 8% organic growth on about $8.07 billion of revenue. At a share price near $100 the stock carries a trailing P/E in the mid-20s and a forward P/E near 21, well below the premium multiple it held before the February 2026 AI selloff. Figures are approximate, drawn from the company's Q2 2026 release and market data as of early August 2026, and the annualized dividend of $2.62 per share works out to a yield in the mid-2% range at that price.

Headline figures (approximate, July 2026): INTU shows revenue (ttm) ~$20B, q3 fy2026 revenue ~$8.6B (+10% YoY), fy2026 revenue guidance ~$21.3B (+13% to 14%), market cap ~$75B; TRI shows revenue (ttm) ~$7.8B, q2 2026 revenue ~$1.95B, +9% (organic +8%), adjusted ebitda margin (q2 2026) ~38.1%, net income (ttm) ~$1.7B.

INTU and TRI are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined INTU and TRI exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.