KLAC vs LRCX: How KLA Corporation and Lam Research Compare (2026)

Last updated August 2026

Short answer

LRCX is the larger of the two ($366.65B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (25.31x forward earnings, beta 1.80). KLAC is the smaller challenger ($238.81B), priced similarly on forward earnings (27.96x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.

KLAC vs LRCX: the tie-breaker metrics

Same yardstick, side by side (as of August 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.

MetricKLACLRCXWhat it tells you
Market cap$238.81B$366.65BSize. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove.
Forward P/E27.9625.31Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up.
Trailing P/E49.9550.78Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price.
Beta1.411.80Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through.
Price vs 52-week range44% of range58% of rangeWhere today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why.
Price / book40.9834.62How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price.

Before you buy: how KLAC and LRCX affect your concentration

The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. KLAC and LRCX share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.

This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined KLAC and LRCX exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.

What does KLA Corporation (KLAC) do?

KLA Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets process control, process-enabling, and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and broader electronics industries worldwide. Its largest segment, Semiconductor Process Control, provides wafer and reticle inspection, metrology, and data analytics systems that chipmakers use to detect defects and measure critical dimensions during fabrication. A Specialty Semiconductor Process segment sells advanced vacuum deposition and etching tools, while a PCB and Component Inspection segment serves electronics manufacturers inspecting printed circuit boards and flat panel displays. KLA earns revenue through equipment sales and a growing base of high-margin service contracts that account for roughly a quarter of total revenue, providing resilience across equipment spending cycles.

Full KLAC guide

What does Lam Research (LRCX) do?

Lam Research is one of the largest semiconductor equipment makers in the world, specializing in wafer-fabrication tools used to build integrated circuits. It is a leader in two critical process steps: etch (precisely removing material to carve nanoscale features) and deposition (laying down ultra-thin films of material), along with related cleaning and surface-preparation systems. These steps are repeated hundreds of times to build modern 3D chip structures, and Lam's tools are essential to manufacturing advanced logic and especially memory chips (DRAM and NAND flash). Lam sells its systems to the world's leading chipmakers and foundries, then earns a large, recurring stream of revenue from spare parts, upgrades, and services for its big installed base of tools, which smooths the cyclical equipment-sales business. Demand is driven by capital spending from semiconductor manufacturers, which rises and falls with chip-industry cycles but trends structurally higher as AI, data centers, and advanced devices require more and more sophisticated chips. Headquartered in Fremont, California, Lam is a key enabler of leading-edge and memory chip production.

Full LRCX guide

KLAC vs LRCX: how do they differ?

Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.

  • KLAC drivers: AI Infrastructure Drives Record Wafer Fab Equipment Spending; Near-Monopoly Market Position with Deep Switching Costs.
  • LRCX drivers: AI-driven chip-capex supercycle; Leadership in etch and deposition.

Which fits which kind of investor

A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most acute near-term risk is U.S.-China export controls: restrictions already introduced have disrupted KLA's backlog, forced the return of customer deposits, and may further limit sales to Chinese fabs, which represent a meaningful share of global semiconductor investment. For LRCX, semiconductor equipment is highly cyclical, and Lam's new-tool sales swing sharply with chipmaker capital-spending cycles, especially in memory, which is among the most volatile end markets.

KLAC or LRCX: which should you pick?

Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick KLAC if you believe its drivers more; LRCX if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the KLAC and LRCX guides.

KLAC vs LRCX: the full fundamentals

KLAC. KLA's fiscal 2025 revenue grew approximately 24% year over year, reflecting the AI-driven acceleration in semiconductor capital equipment spending, and net income grew even faster at roughly 47% as operating leverage amplified revenue gains into margin expansion. The trailing P/E of approximately 73x is well above KLA's own five-year average of roughly 26x, indicating that the market is pricing in continued strong growth from AI infrastructure investment. Investors weighing the valuation should note that the company generates substantial free cash flow and has raised its dividend for seventeen consecutive years, but the premium multiple leaves limited margin of safety if growth decelerates or export restrictions intensify.

LRCX. Lam trades at a multiple reflecting both strong secular demand for chip equipment and the cyclicality of the memory-heavy equipment market. The valuation embeds expectations of a structural rise in semiconductor capital spending driven by AI, balanced against export-control risk and the swing factor of memory capex. The large, higher-margin installed-base service revenue supports a premium over a purely cyclical equipment maker. Lam also returns substantial cash through buybacks and a growing dividend.

Headline figures (approximate, 2026-06-19): KLAC shows revenue (fy2025, ended june 30, 2025) ~$12.16 billion, revenue (ttm through sept 30, 2025) ~$12.52 billion, net income (fy2025) ~$4.06 billion, gross margin (ttm) ~61%; LRCX shows revenue (ttm) ~$16 billion, operating margin ~30%, net income (ttm) ~$4-5 billion, p/e (ttm) ~25x.

The bottom line: KLAC vs LRCX

KLAC and LRCX are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined KLAC and LRCX exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.

Wondering how KLAC or LRCX fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.

Investing in KLA Corporation with AI

Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how KLAC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.

FAQ

What is the difference between KLAC and LRCX?

+

KLA Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets process control, process-enabling, and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and broader electronics industries worldwide. Lam Research is one of the largest semiconductor equipment makers in the world, specializing in wafer-fabrication tools used to build integrated circuits. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.

Is KLAC or LRCX the better stock?

+

Neither is universally better. LRCX is the larger incumbent; KLAC is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.

Which is cheaper, KLAC or LRCX?

+

On forward P/E (as of August 2026), KLAC trades at 27.96x and LRCX at 25.31x, so LRCX is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.

Should you own both KLAC and LRCX?

+

Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.

What are the risks of KLAC vs LRCX?

+

KLAC: The most acute near-term risk is U.S.-China export controls: restrictions already introduced have disrupted KLA's backlog, forced the return of customer deposits, and may further limit sales to Chinese fabs, which represent a meaningful share of global semiconductor investment. Semiconductor capital expenditure is cyclical, and a demand correction could sharply compress equipment revenue in a short time window. At a post-split trailing P/E of approximately 73x, the stock embeds a high-growth assumption; any deceleration in AI-related capex or a broader macro slowdown could compress the multiple meaningfully. A longer-term structural risk is that well-capitalized peers such as ASML or Applied Materials could integrate metrology capabilities into their own platforms, gradually eroding KLA's standalone tool-of-record position. LRCX: Semiconductor equipment is highly cyclical, and Lam's new-tool sales swing sharply with chipmaker capital-spending cycles, especially in memory, which is among the most volatile end markets. US export restrictions on advanced chipmaking equipment to China are a significant headwind, since China has been a large customer; tighter rules can cut a meaningful slice of revenue. Customer concentration among a handful of large chipmakers, intense competition from Applied Materials and Tokyo Electron, and sensitivity to memory pricing and macro demand all add risk. A downturn in chip capex or escalating trade restrictions would pressure results and the stock.

Related comparisons

Browse all stock comparisons.

Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell KLAC or LRCX; figures are approximate and dated (as of August 2026). Verify current data before investing.

    KLAC vs LRCX: How KLA Corporation and Lam Research Compare (2026) - Walnut AI Investing App