KLAC vs LRCX: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated November 2026
Short answer
LRCX is the larger of the two ($286.83B market cap): the incumbent the market prices for continued execution (18.73x forward earnings, beta 2.01). KLAC is the smaller challenger ($203.39B), actually pricier on forward earnings (22.01x): more room to run, but more to prove. The real question is which set of drivers you believe, and whether owning one (or both) leaves you over-concentrated.
KLAC vs LRCX: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of November 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | KLAC | LRCX | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $203.39B | $286.83B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 22.01 | 18.73 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Trailing P/E | 39.12 | 34.16 | Valuation on the last 12 months. A big drop from trailing to forward means the market expects earnings to jump, so more growth is already in the price. |
| Beta | 1.50 | 2.01 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 24% of range | 31% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 31.19 | 20.59 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: LRCX is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how KLAC and LRCX affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. KLAC and LRCX share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined KLAC and LRCX exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does KLA Corporation (KLAC) do?
KLA Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets process control, process-enabling, and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and broader electronics industries worldwide. Its largest segment, Semiconductor Process Control, provides wafer and reticle inspection, metrology, and data analytics systems that chipmakers use to detect defects and measure critical dimensions during fabrication. A Specialty Semiconductor Process segment sells advanced vacuum deposition and etching tools, while a PCB and Component Inspection segment serves electronics manufacturers inspecting printed circuit boards and flat panel displays. KLA earns revenue through equipment sales and a growing base of high-margin service contracts that account for roughly a quarter of total revenue, providing resilience across equipment spending cycles.
What does Lam Research (LRCX) do?
Lam Research is one of the largest semiconductor equipment makers in the world, specializing in wafer-fabrication tools used to build integrated circuits. It is a leader in two critical process steps: etch (precisely removing material to carve nanoscale features) and deposition (laying down ultra-thin films of material), along with related cleaning and surface-preparation systems. These steps are repeated hundreds of times to build modern 3D chip structures, and Lam's tools are essential to manufacturing advanced logic and especially memory chips (DRAM and NAND flash). Lam sells its systems to the world's leading chipmakers and foundries, then earns a large, recurring stream of revenue from spare parts, upgrades, and services for its big installed base of tools, which smooths the cyclical equipment-sales business. Demand is driven by capital spending from semiconductor manufacturers, which rises and falls with chip-industry cycles but trends structurally higher as AI, data centers, and advanced devices require more and more sophisticated chips. Headquartered in Fremont, California, Lam is a key enabler of leading-edge and memory chip production.
KLAC vs LRCX: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- KLAC drivers: AI Infrastructure Drives Record Wafer Fab Equipment Spending; Near-Monopoly Market Position with Deep Switching Costs.
- LRCX drivers: AI-driven chip-capex supercycle; Leadership in etch and deposition.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: The most acute near-term risk is U.S.-China export controls: restrictions already introduced have disrupted KLA's backlog, forced the return of customer deposits, and may further limit sales to Chinese fabs, which represent a meaningful share of global semiconductor investment. For LRCX, semiconductor equipment is highly cyclical, and Lam's new-tool sales swing sharply with chipmaker capital-spending cycles, especially in memory, which is among the most volatile end markets.
KLAC or LRCX: which should you pick?
Growth-minded investors who believe the theme has years to run tend to accept the richer multiple for more upside; value-minded investors lean toward the cheaper forward earnings and steadier profile. Pick KLAC if you believe its drivers more; LRCX if you believe its. Many investors hold both, but since they share themes, that is a concentrated bet, not diversification. Decide deliberately and check overlap. For the full detail, see the KLAC and LRCX guides.
KLAC vs LRCX: the full fundamentals
KLAC. KLA's revenue grew about 24% in fiscal 2025 and about 12% in fiscal 2026, with net income rising faster than revenue in both years as operating leverage carried revenue gains into margin. At about $169 a share the stock trades near 46 times trailing earnings and about 25 times forward estimates, down from roughly 73 times trailing in June 2026 as earnings grew and the share price fell about 22% over three months, but still well above KLA's own five-year average of roughly 26 times trailing. The forward multiple leans on consensus for fiscal 2027 revenue of about $18.1 billion and EPS of $5.44, so the October 28, 2026 report and guidance matter. The company generates substantial cash and has raised its dividend for seventeen consecutive years, but the premium multiple leaves limited margin of safety if growth decelerates or export restrictions intensify.
LRCX. At about $269, Lam trades near 47 times trailing earnings but about 23 times forward earnings, a gap that shows how much growth analysts expect in fiscal 2027 (consensus revenue near $34.9 billion). The 31 analysts covering it have a mean target of about $376. The shares remain sensitive to any sign that AI-driven memory and logic capex is peaking, as the mid-October chip sell-off showed.
Headline figures (approximate, October 2026): KLAC shows revenue (fy2026, ended june 30, 2026) ~$13.58 billion (up ~12%), net income (fy2026) ~$4.83 billion (up from ~$4.06 billion), june 2026 quarter Revenue ~$3.66 billion (up ~15% YoY); EPS ~$1.05 vs ~$1.00 consensus, gross / operating margin (ttm) ~61% / ~42%; LRCX shows revenue (fy2026, ended june) ~$23.2 billion (latest quarter +30% y/y), margins Gross ~50%, operating ~37%, net ~31%, net income (ttm) ~$7.3 billion (EPS ~$5.76), p/e (trailing / forward) ~47x / ~23x.
The bottom line: KLAC vs LRCX
KLAC and LRCX are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined KLAC and LRCX exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how KLAC or LRCX fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in KLA Corporation with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how KLAC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between KLAC and LRCX?
+
KLA Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets process control, process-enabling, and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and broader electronics industries worldwide. Lam Research is one of the largest semiconductor equipment makers in the world, specializing in wafer-fabrication tools used to build integrated circuits. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is KLAC or LRCX the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better. LRCX is the larger incumbent; KLAC is the smaller challenger and looks pricier on forward earnings. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, KLAC or LRCX?
+
On forward P/E (as of November 2026), KLAC trades at 22.01x and LRCX at 18.73x, so LRCX is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both KLAC and LRCX?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of KLAC vs LRCX?
+
KLAC: The most acute near-term risk is U.S.-China export controls: restrictions already introduced have disrupted KLA's backlog, forced the return of customer deposits, and may further limit sales to Chinese fabs, which represent a meaningful share of global semiconductor investment. Semiconductor capital expenditure is cyclical, and a demand correction could sharply compress equipment revenue in a short time window. At a trailing P/E of approximately 46x and a forward P/E near 25x as of mid-October 2026, the stock embeds a high-growth assumption; any deceleration in AI-related capex or a broader macro slowdown could compress the multiple meaningfully. The roughly 22% decline over the three months to October 16, 2026, during a sector-wide round of profit-taking in chip equipment stocks, shows how quickly that can happen even without a company-specific setback. A longer-term structural risk is that well-capitalized peers such as ASML or Applied Materials could integrate metrology capabilities into their own platforms, gradually eroding KLA's standalone tool-of-record position. LRCX: Semiconductor equipment is highly cyclical, and Lam's new-tool sales swing sharply with chipmaker capital-spending cycles, especially in memory, which is among the most volatile end markets. US export restrictions on advanced chipmaking equipment to China are a significant headwind, since China has been a large customer; tighter rules can cut a meaningful slice of revenue. Customer concentration among a handful of large chipmakers, intense competition from Applied Materials and Tokyo Electron, and sensitivity to memory pricing and macro demand all add risk. A downturn in chip capex or escalating trade restrictions would pressure results and the stock. Valuation is a newer risk: at about 47 times trailing earnings the shares price in a strong fiscal 2027, and the 17% drop over the past three months shows how quickly sentiment on AI capex can turn.
Related comparisons
Browse all stock comparisons.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell KLAC or LRCX; figures are approximate and dated (as of November 2026). Verify current data before investing.