MAC vs SSDOY: Which Is the Better Buy in 2026?
Last updated October 2026
Short answer
MAC and SSDOY are similarly sized, but SSDOY trades noticeably cheaper on forward earnings (7.55x vs 361.28x): the market is paying up for MAC's profile and pricing SSDOY more conservatively, or for faster growth. Which you prefer comes down to the drivers you believe, and whether adding either over-concentrates what you already own.
MAC vs SSDOY: the tie-breaker metrics
Same yardstick, side by side (as of October 2026). Valuation lined up like this is most meaningful for two names in the same corner of the market, which these are. Figures are approximate; verify before investing.
| Metric | MAC | SSDOY | What it tells you |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $6.75B | $8.33B | Size. The larger name is the incumbent; the smaller has more room to grow and more to prove. |
| Forward P/E | 361.28 | 7.55 | Valuation on next year's expected earnings, the same yardstick for both. Lower is cheaper for that growth; higher means the market is paying up. |
| Beta | 2.06 | 0.59 | Volatility vs the market. Above 1 swings harder than the index; below 1 is steadier. Higher beta means bigger drawdowns to hold through. |
| Price vs 52-week range | 64% of range | 70% of range | Where today's price sits between the 52-week low and high. Near the high is momentum with less margin of safety; near the low is out of favor or a discount, depending on why. |
| Price / book | 2.30 | 2.06 | How much you pay over book value. Very high can signal an asset-light, high-return business or a rich price. |
Reading it: SSDOY is the cheaper of the two on forward earnings, but cheaper is not the same as better. Pair the valuation with growth (how far the forward P/E sits below the trailing P/E) and risk (beta) before you decide.
Before you buy: how MAC and SSDOY affect your concentration
The metrics above tell you which is the marginally better business. The bigger risk for most people is not picking the slightly worse stock, it is over-concentrating. MAC and SSDOY share themes, so owning both, or adding either to what you already hold, can quietly push a large share of your portfolio into one bet.
This is the part a generic comparison page cannot answer, because it depends on what you own. Connect your brokerage and Walnut shows your real, combined MAC and SSDOY exposure, flags overlap with your existing positions, and tells you if adding one would tip you past a concentration you are comfortable with, read-only by default, with your login staying at your broker. Walnut is not an investment adviser.
What does The Macerich Company (MAC) do?
The Macerich Company, founded in 1964 and headquartered in Santa Monica, California, owns, leases and redevelops regional town centers in dense, higher-income US markets. Its holdings cluster in California, the Pacific Northwest, the Phoenix and Scottsdale corridor, and the stretch from metro New York to Washington, DC, with flagships including Tysons Corner Center, Queens Center, Scottsdale Fashion Square, Washington Square and Green Acres Mall. After several years of selling and handing back weaker assets, the portfolio sat at roughly 38 to 39 retail centers and about 40 million square feet as of the second quarter of 2026, down from 48 million square feet earlier in the program. Trailing 12-month tenant sales for spaces under 10,000 square feet reached about $919 per square foot, up from roughly $849 a year earlier, and trailing revenue runs near $1.03 billion.
What does Shiseido Company, Limited (SSDOY) do?
Shiseido Company, Limited makes and sells skincare, makeup and fragrance, mostly at prestige price points. Its core brands are SHISEIDO, Clé de Peau Beauté and NARS, backed by what management calls next-generation growth brands such as ELIXIR, ANESSA and the fragrance lines it licenses or owns, including narciso rodriguez, ISSEY MIYAKE, Zadig&Voltaire and, from 2026, MaxMara. It also owns US skincare brands Drunk Elephant and Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare. In fiscal 2025 (calendar year) net sales were ¥970.0bn, split across five regional businesses: China and Travel Retail (¥342.2bn), Japan (¥295.3bn), EMEA (¥141.1bn), the Americas (¥106.6bn) and Asia Pacific (¥73.3bn). Profit is far more concentrated than sales: China and Travel Retail earned ¥64.5bn of core operating profit and Japan ¥39.0bn, while the Americas lost ¥11.6bn.
MAC vs SSDOY: how do they differ?
Both fit overlapping themes, but they are not interchangeable. The useful comparison is which set of drivers and risks you want exposure to.
- MAC drivers: Deleveraging toward the 6x goal; The signed-not-open rent pipeline.
- SSDOY drivers: Structural reform savings flowing into profit; China and travel retail stabilizing.
Which fits which kind of investor
A faster-growing, richer-valued name usually swings harder, so it suits a longer horizon and a higher tolerance for volatility; a steadier, more cash-generative business suits a more conservative or income-minded investor. The honest test is which set of risks you could hold through a drawdown: Dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. For SSDOY, shiseido's recovery so far rests more on cost cuts than on sales, and that has a limit.
MAC or SSDOY: which should you pick?
MAC vs SSDOY: the full fundamentals
MAC. FFO per share has been close to flat while total FFO rose, because the 2026 equity raises expanded the denominator faster than the operating recovery expanded the numerator. Management's public bridge to $1.80 to $2.00 of 2028 FFO per share leans on the signed-not-open rent pipeline, cheaper refinancing as leverage falls, and yield on the Annapolis and redevelopment spend. Against that target the current price sits near 13 times, so the multiple is doing less work than the execution is.
SSDOY. The figures show a company whose profit is recovering much faster than its sales. Trailing net sales of roughly ¥1 trillion have barely moved in three years, while core operating profit went from ¥36.4bn in 2024 to ¥44.5bn in 2025 and is guided to ¥69.0bn in 2026, which would be a 7% margin. Management's 2030 aim of 10% or more would still leave Shiseido well below the margins of larger global rivals, which is the core of the bull case: there is room to improve if sales growth returns. Statutory profit has been distorted by restructuring and impairment charges, with a ¥40.7bn net loss in 2025 and a forecast ¥42.0bn profit (¥105.12 per share) in 2026. Results for the nine months to September are due in November 2026.
Headline figures (approximate, August 2026): MAC shows revenue (ttm) ~$1.03B (Q2 2026: ~$249.7M, first half: ~$491.2M), ffo as adjusted per share ~$0.35 in Q2 2026 and ~$0.70 for the first half, versus ~$1.50 for full-year 2025, gaap net loss per share ~$(0.10) in Q2 2026, ~$(0.24) for the first half, net debt / adjusted ebitda ~7.3x, or ~6.8x pro forma for forward equity, against a ~6x 2028 target; SSDOY shows net sales (ttm to june 2026) ~¥999bn, net sales (fy2025) ¥970.0bn (-2%), core operating profit (h1 2026) ¥44.4bn (+90.1%), core operating margin (h1 2026) ~8.9%.
The bottom line: MAC vs SSDOY
MAC and SSDOY are related but distinct: same themes, different businesses and risks. Neither wins in the abstract; the right pick is whichever thesis you actually believe, sized so you are not over-concentrated in one theme. Walnut can show your combined MAC and SSDOY exposure against your real portfolio. It is not an investment adviser.
Wondering how MAC or SSDOY fits the portfolio you already own? Walnut is an AI investing app that connects your brokerage read-only and answers questions like that about your actual holdings: overlap, concentration, and how each position tracks the S&P 500. Compare the best AI portfolio analyzers or see the best AI investing apps in 2026.
Investing in The Macerich Company with AI
Connect the broker you already use and ask Walnut's AI how MAC fits what you actually hold: whether you own it already through a fund, what it would do to your concentration, and how it has tracked the S&P 500. Read-only by default, and you approve anything before it reaches your broker.
FAQ
What is the difference between MAC and SSDOY?
+
The Macerich Company, founded in 1964 and headquartered in Santa Monica, California, owns, leases and redevelops regional town centers in dense, higher-income US markets. Shiseido Company, Limited makes and sells skincare, makeup and fragrance, mostly at prestige price points. They show up together because they share investment themes, but they are different businesses, so the better fit depends on which thesis you are expressing.
Is MAC or SSDOY the better stock?
+
Neither is universally better; they suit different views and risk levels. Walnut is informational, not investment advice. Compare what each does, the tie-breaker metrics above, and the risks, then decide which fits your thesis and what you already own.
Which is cheaper, MAC or SSDOY?
+
On forward P/E (as of October 2026), MAC trades at 361.28x and SSDOY at 7.55x, so SSDOY is the cheaper of the two on next year's expected earnings. A lower multiple is not automatically the better buy: a richer valuation can be justified by faster growth, and a lower one can reflect real risk. Weigh the multiple against how fast each business is compounding.
Should you own both MAC and SSDOY?
+
Because they share themes, owning both concentrates you in that theme. That can be intentional (a focused bet) or accidental (less diversification than it looks). Walnut can show your combined exposure across both, and whether adding either over-concentrates you, before you buy.
What are the risks of MAC vs SSDOY?
+
MAC: Dilution is the most concrete cost of the turnaround: two 2026 equity offerings plus a $675 million exchangeable note materially raised the share and unit count, which is why FFO per share has barely moved even as total FFO grew. Tenant credit remains a live drag, with Forever 21's liquidation alone releasing about 570,000 square feet across Macerich centers and Claire's filing again in 2025, so backfilling vacancy is a permanent operating expense rather than a one-time event. Property-level debt still bites: the $76 million loan secured by Twenty Ninth Street in Boulder sat in default after its February maturity, and while a single mortgage default is not a corporate solvency issue, it shows the asset-by-asset workout is unfinished. GAAP net losses persist and the dividend, at $0.17 per quarter or roughly $0.68 annualized, was cut deeply from pre-2020 levels and is covered by FFO rather than by earnings. Finally, the valuation itself is a risk: near 16 times trailing FFO and roughly 13 times the midpoint of the company's own 2028 target, the shares already assume the plan lands close to schedule, so a missed disposition, a rate move, or a weaker consumer would hit the multiple and the estimates at the same time. SSDOY: Shiseido's recovery so far rests more on cost cuts than on sales, and that has a limit. First-half 2026 net sales were down 0.2% like-for-like, and management itself flagged a risk of underperformance in EMEA and the Americas, where competition from new brands is intense and prices are polarizing between luxury and discount. China and Travel Retail generates most of the profit, so a renewed slowdown in Chinese prestige spending, tighter controls on daigou resellers, or further disruption in Hainan or mainland duty-free would hit earnings disproportionately. Tensions between Japan and China have already cut Chinese tourist spending in Japan, and management assumed in its 2026 plan that the impact would persist. The US portfolio has destroyed value before: the ¥46.8bn 2025 impairment tied to the Americas shows that acquired brands such as Drunk Elephant can lose relevance quickly, and Drunk Elephant sales were still falling 12% in the first half of 2026. Some first-half profit came from one-offs, including the reversal of US inventory provisions (about ¥5bn) and roughly ¥3bn of currency benefit, which will not repeat in the second half when marketing spend for launches such as MaxMara rises. New product bets can miss, as the NARS Natural Matte Longwear Foundation did in the US. Raw material costs and supply were affected by conflict in the Middle East earlier in 2026. For ADR holders, yen weakness reduces the dollar value of sales, profit and dividends even as it flatters reported yen sales, and Japanese withholding tax reduces dividend income. SSDOY trades over the counter, so liquidity is thinner than the Tokyo line.
Walnut is informational, not investment advice. This page is descriptive and not a recommendation to buy or sell MAC or SSDOY; figures are approximate and dated (as of October 2026). Verify current data before investing.